It is obvious and scientifically valid to claim, through the scientific interpretation of the prevailing Universal formation between it's existence in singularity and the begining of the existential events, that both - space and time - emerge from the beginning of the Universal events.
Space is fundamentally defined as the dimensions of height, depth, and width within which all things exist and move, and dimension is a measurable extent of a particular kind, such as length, breadth, depth, or height.
Whereas space and time, both, are fundamentally conceptual, rather abstract mathematical entities and so they are not natural, nor real.
By the word 'natural' we generally mean something existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind, and by the word 'real' we generally mean something actually existing as a thing or occurring in fact; not imagined or supposed.
Whereas, Wikipedia defined abstraction in mathematics as the process of extracting the underlying structures, patterns or properties of a mathematical concept, removing any dependence on real world objects with which it might originally have been connected, and generalizing it so that it has wider applications or matching among other abstract descriptions of equivalent phenomena.
Wikipedia also defined time as the indefinite continued progress of existence and events in the past, present, and future regarded as a whole, succeeds in irreversible and uniformed succession, referred in fourth dimension above three spatial dimensions. This means events invoke time.
And so, the emergence of space and time do not depend on existence - in any of its forms, singularity or eventual - but such emergence entirely depend on the existential events.
The begining of the Universal events signify the emergence of space and time but no other.
Therefore, through the relevant verification of science, mathematics, and philosophy, if it's established that space and time are not natural entities but conceptual emergents, this will greatly shock our present understanding in cosmology and that would pave they way to a new understanding in science and it's laws as we know today.
And such possibilities certainly would challenge Relativity in fundamental level, would require its restructuring.
No comments:
Post a Comment