My explanation to a user's question in regard to an earlier post titled, "Constant speed of light and uniformed succession of time invalidates time dilation..

The earlier post is available here

• For electromagnetic waves, c = λ/T.

• Since speed of light is constant (c), succession of time needs to be uniformed."

Clarification:

I am not assuming anything eventual (wavelength) in the equation, because of these entities - time period (T) and speed of light (c) are the most significant considerations in the whole equation.

Moreover, if we have to honour the constant speed of light (c), then we will have the natural right to honour the uniformity in the progression of time (t=T/360) too, as any additional condition imposed on the equation (on c) needs to be applicable to (T) too.

And in case of ideal value of wavelength, constancy for the speed of light (c) and uniformity for the progression of time (T) won't be disturbed.

But if the wavelength changes it's value, the value of time period (T) too would he changed - only if c is constant. And such change in wavelength would be considered due some external distortion - as an error - and not an ideal condition.

That is why time dilation is impossible, but it is rather wavelength dilation due to external influence that caused error in the wavelength.

So it is wavelength distortion than time dilation when wavelength distortions correspond to time distortion. It is more of distortion than dilation.

Hope you understand the essence of the post.

I have my published paper invalidating time dilation through other method though.

#speedoflight #sucessionoftime #wavelength #timeperiod #timedilation