ResearchGate Question: Is the frequency of 5.15×10⁴⁰ Hz associated with the Big Bang at the 0-dimensional point theoretically meaningful according to the Planck scale?

"The apparent frequency threshold of 5.15 × 10⁴⁰ Hz at the 0-dimensional point is a significant theoretical threshold associated with the Big Bang scenario. This threshold signifies a high rate of oscillation or change within the theoretical framework, potentially representing a fundamental point where theoretical physics postulates a transition or event marking the origin of the universe. It serves as a hypothetical marker or boundary within theoretical discussions about the early universe and the conditions prevailing during the initial stages of the Big Bang.

At this frequency, the energy density or intensity of physical processes might be incredibly high, potentially pointing towards extreme conditions present during the cosmic inflation phase or at the onset of the universe's expansion. The theoretical implications of this threshold are that more advanced theories, such as quantum gravity, are needed to comprehend the physical phenomena occurring at such extreme scales."

This question contemplates the significance of exploring frequencies beyond the Planck threshold, particularly 5.15 × 10⁴⁰ Hz, associated with the 0-dimensional point within a theoretical framework linked to the Big Bang scenario. While the Planck length defines the smallest meaningful measurement of length within our current understanding and perception, the query raises a fundamental consideration about the mathematical or hypothetical significance of probing beyond this threshold.

The discussion questions the notion that the Planck length's limitation might solely stem from our current perceptual constraints beyond the Planck scale. It suggests that while our perception might be limited, mathematical explorations and theoretical frameworks could potentially extend beyond these perceived limitations. Therefore, the inquiry focuses on the theoretical and mathematical implications of investigating frequencies beyond the Planck threshold, questioning whether such explorations hold significance within the realm of theoretical physics and cosmology.

Author's response to the first reply.

Thank you for your response regarding the frequency threshold of 5.15 × 10⁴⁰ Hz associated with the 0-dimensional point in the context of the Planck scale and theoretical physics. I appreciate your engagement on this topic.

Your points raise important considerations, and I'd like to provide a detailed perspective regarding the derivation and theoretical significance of the mentioned frequency within the context of the Big Bang scenario and Planck units.

Frequency's Theoretical Significance:

Your response expressed scepticism about the theoretical meaningfulness of the 5.15 × 10⁴⁰ Hz frequency without providing specific reasoning for its dismissal. The derivation of this frequency involved mathematical equations utilizing fundamental constants, notably Planck Time and Planck Frequency. This process was fundamental in establishing the frequency associated with the 0-dimensional state within the theoretical framework of the early universe.

Understanding Planck Units Beyond Dimensional Analysis:

Your viewpoint suggested that Planck units simply reflect dimensional analysis. However, it's essential to note that Planck units derive from fundamental physical constants such as the speed of light, gravitational constant, reduced Planck constant, and Boltzmann constant. They signify scales where conventional physics might not adequately describe phenomena. Thus, they extend beyond mere dimensional analysis, signifying profound physical implications.

Derivation of 5.15 × 10⁴⁰ Hz Frequency:

The derivation process involved specific equations that relate frequency, time differences, and phase shifts, utilizing constants like Planck Time and Planck Frequency. Through this method, the frequency associated with the 0-dimensional state was calculated to be approximately 5.15 × 10⁴⁰ Hz. This derivation was carried out within the theoretical construct of the Big Bang scenario, signifying a fundamental frequency linked to the early universe.

The derived frequency using the following method:

Utilizing an equation representing the relationship between frequency (f), time difference (Δt), and phase shift T(deg): 

T(deg) = (1/f) × (1/360) 

Incorporating Planck Time (tP) = 5.391247 × 10⁻⁴⁴ seconds and Planck Frequency (fₚₗₐₙₖ) = 1.498 × 10⁴³ Hz into the derivation process.

Solving for the frequency at the 0-dimensional threshold (f₀): f₀ = 1/(Δt × 360); 

Resulting in f₀ ≈ 5.15 × 10⁴⁰ Hz, reflecting the frequency associated with the 0-dimensional state within the provided theoretical framework.

This methodological derivation, grounded in established equations and fundamental constants, signifies the theoretical significance of the derived frequency within the context of the Big Bang scenario and the Planck scale, providing a deeper understanding of the theoretical constructs used to ascertain such frequencies.

In short, the derivation of the 5.15 × 10⁴⁰ Hz frequency involved rigorous mathematical processes and considerations of fundamental constants, establishing its theoretical significance within the context of the early universe and the Planck scale.

Thank you for engaging in this discussion, and I welcome any further insights or discussions on this topic.

Best regards,

Authors response1 to William Bray

<<The idea that Gravitation fails at the Planck scale...>>

The universe began as a singularity, a point with zero volume and infinite density containing all the energy of the universe. Then the big bang occurred, rapidly expanding all that energy with enough ferocity to overpower the inward pull of gravity so we can tell that gravity was present during those early moments,

The concept of Gravitation failing at the Planck scale, as suggested by your counterargument, appears to be invalidated by the well-established understanding of the universe's early moments, particularly the Big Bang.

The Big Bang theory posits the universe's origin as a singularity, which was a point of infinite density and zero volume. This singularity represents a state where the gravitational force was active, and the known laws of physics couldn't be firmly established due to the extreme conditions prevailing at that point.. As the universe rapidly expanded during the Big Bang, it overcame gravitational forces due to an immense outward force, allowing the universe to evolve.

Given that gravity played a role during the universe's initial moments, suggesting its presence and influence at a stage far beyond the Planck scale, challenges the notion of Gravitation failing at that scale. Since the big bang, gravity has countered the force exerted by the inflation, slowing the velocities of the universes' expanding energy.

Therefore, Bray's contention regarding the failure of gravitation at the Planck scale might not hold true when considering the universe's early moments.

Regards,

Authors response2 to Mr. Ahmed M. Elsayed ,

I trust this message finds you well. I wanted to extend my gratitude for your insightful contribution to the discussion on exploring the limits of existence within the universe. Your elucidation of the Planck Length and its significance in theoretical physics was both comprehensive and rational. It provided a profound understanding of the critical role this fundamental scale plays in shaping our comprehension of the universe.

Your discussion on the "Unknown Gap" greatly resonates with my perspective. The mysteries surrounding dark energy and dark matter indeed constitute significant enigmas within our current understanding. Your insight into their potential existence beyond the Planck scale highlights a crucial aspect—that without technological advancements, our ability to observe or measure these phenomena might remain elusive.

The suggestion that the scales for measuring dark energy and dark matter might extend beyond the Planck scale raises the possibility that we may never observe or measure these entities physically, unless substantial technological advancements enable such measurements.

Your emphasis on new physics models, including string theory and the quantum theory of gravity, is encouraging. While these models are pivotal in advancing our comprehension of the universe, it's equally imperative to explore the theoretical landscape pre-Big Bang. Understanding the pre-Big Bang state can significantly enhance our insights into post-Big Bang phenomena, such as the models you mentioned.

I wholeheartedly agree with your view that advancements in technology, scientific research, and interdisciplinary collaboration hold immense promise in expanding our knowledge of the universe's unknown aspects and its existence limits. It's through continuous dedication, exploration, and collaboration that we move closer to unravelling the mysteries that have intrigued humanity for centuries.

Best regards,

Author's reply to Mr. Sergey Shevchenko,

Thank you immensely for your thought-provoking insights into the fundamental structure of the universe and the Planck scale. Your detailed description of the informational physical model offers a unique perspective on the foundational elements underlying the cosmos.

I find your concept of a dense lattice of primary elementary logical structures intriguing. However, I am pondering whether the building blocks of these structures within the lattice might be frequency-based. My understanding aligns with the idea that oscillatory or vibrational frequencies serve as the essence of existence, constituting energy and the fundamental forces of the universe. Therefore, ascertaining whether frequency is the fundamental element within these structures is a pivotal question.

Regarding disturbances within this lattice representing everything in matter, I am eager to delve deeper into this notion. Understanding what these disturbances entail is crucial to grasp how they translate into observable phenomena within the framework of the universe's formation.

Your emphasis on fundamental constants deriving from more foundational Planck constants resonates deeply with the concept of the Planck scale, which acts as a nexus point intertwining gravity, quantum mechanics etc. It's fascinating to consider how these constants are interconnected and contribute to our understanding of the universe.

I agree with your viewpoint on gravity and the notion that particles with a mass equal to the Planck mass might offer a different perspective than the conventional idea of "black holes" as distortions in spacetime. The concept of mass and its correlation to spacetime distortions needs further exploration, and your perspective sheds light on alternative interpretations.

Your informational conception presents a compelling framework, and I am eager to explore its implications further. Your contributions undoubtedly open new avenues for understanding the universe's intricacies and its fundamental elements.

Warm regards,