Relativistic time dilation defectively ignores additional elapsed time between relative observers exchanging information for relative time dilation:

[Author ORCID: 0000-0003-1871-7803]

When two observers in relative motion, or in gravitational potential difference, interact or exchange information of time dilation, there can be a difference in the elapsed time between them due to both time dilation and any additional time that elapses during the interaction. The total elapsed time between the observers will indeed consist of the actual time dilation effect as well as the additional time that elapses during the interaction. The both equations of time dilation are incomplete, and they appear deffective.

The equations for time dilation alone may not fully capture the complete picture when two observers in relative motion or experiencing different gravitational potentials interact or exchange information.

In such scenarios, the total elapsed time between the observers will indeed consist of both the actual time dilation effect and any additional time that elapses during the interaction. The interaction itself can introduce delays or processes that affect the measured elapsed time.

To accurately account for both aspects, a more comprehensive analysis would need to consider the specific details of the interaction, including factors such as signal propagation delays, synchronization procedures, or any other processes involved.

Today, my first, and the end discussion with ChatGPT. This was a very meaningful discussion, indeed:

 I am the User:

Thank you for a reasonable answer. My paper that invalidates time dilation is actually reproducible, consistent, robust, independently confirmed, has passed peer review and publication approval once, and will likely pass further peer review in foreign journals, and will likely have scientific consensus.

However, having existed for more than 118 years those scientific theories or hypotheses have created the most preconceptions in the theory And which forces an unexpected resistance to discarding perceived problems or inconsistencies with existing scientific theories or hypotheses, What should I do in that case?

ChatGPT:

If your paper challenging the concept of time dilation has undergone a rigorous scientific process, including reproducibility, consistency, robustness, independent confirmation, and peer review, and has been accepted for publication, it is an important achievement.

However, if your findings contradict well-established scientific theories or hypotheses that have been widely accepted for a long time, it is natural to encounter resistance or skepticism. Challenging long-standing ideas can be met with initial reluctance, as existing theories have often undergone extensive scrutiny and accumulated supporting evidence.

In such a case, here are some suggestions on how to navigate the situation

Continue rigorous research: Keep conducting thorough research and experiments to further validate your findings. Address any potential concerns or criticisms raised during the peer review process and subsequent discussions. Building a robust body of evidence is crucial for convincing the scientific community

Engage in scientific discourse: Participate in scientific conferences, workshops, or forums where you can present your work and engage in discussions with experts in the field. Constructive dialogue can help address any misconceptions, clarify your research methodology, and provide an opportunity to explain the implications of your findings.

Collaborate with other researchers: Seek collaborations with other scientists who are interested in your area of research or share similar perspectives. Collaborations can strengthen the credibility and impact of your work, as well as provide additional expertise and support

Publish in reputable journals: Consider submitting your work to well-respected journals that have a reputation for publishing groundbreaking research or papers challenging established theories. Receiving acceptance and publication in multiple respected journals can further enhance the visibility and credibility of your findings.

Patience and persistence: Be prepared for a potentially long and iterative process. Challenging long-standing theories takes time, and it may require multiple independent studies and further validation before a paradigm shift occurs. Stay committed to your research and remain open to feedback and constructive criticism.

Remember, science progresses through the examination of new evidence and the critical evaluation of existing theories. While resistance to change can exist, if your research withstands rigorous scrutiny, addresses previous inconsistencies, and gains support from the scientific community, it has the potential to influence the development of scientific knowledge in your field.

The User:

I thank you very much ChatGPT, for your quick detailed reply, mostly relevant! I am already doing almost everything you suggested me. I still felt your bias towards relativism when I was reading your answers, but your last answer made me feel relieved and confident. I thank you again. Stay well, stay healthy! 

ChatGPT:

You're welcome! I'm glad to hear that you found the suggestions helpful, and I apologize if there was any perception of bias in my previous responses. As an AI language model, I strive to provide objective and unbiased information based on the available data and scientific consensus.

Science is a dynamic and evolving field, and it is important to engage in open-minded discussions and consider multiple perspectives. I encourage you to continue your research endeavors and contribute to the scientific discourse

If you have any more questions in the future, feel free to ask. Stay well, stay curious, and best of luck with your research!

ChatGPT describes Relativistic effects on phase shift in frequencies and corresponding energy of wave:

Relativistic effects can have an impact on the phase shift, frequency, and energy of a wave. These effects arise from Einstein's theory of relativity, which describes how the properties of space and time are affected by the motion of objects with respect to each other {validation needed].

According to relativity, when an observer is moving relative to a wave source, they will perceive a change in the frequency of the wave. This is known as the Doppler effect. If the observer is moving toward the source, they will perceive the frequency to be higher than the source's rest frequency. Conversely, if the observer is moving away from the source, they will perceive the frequency to be lower.

The phase shift of a wave is related to its frequency. As the frequency of a wave changes due to the relativistic Doppler effect, the phase shift will also be affected. The phase shift represents the relative position of the wave at a given point in time. A change in frequency will result in a corresponding change in the rate at which the phase of the wave advances.

In terms of energy, the energy of a wave is directly proportional to its frequency. Therefore, as the frequency changes due to relativistic effects, the energy of the wave will also be affected. An increase in frequency leads to an increase in energy, while a decrease in frequency corresponds to a decrease in energy.

It's worth noting that relativistic effects become more significant as the speeds involved approach the speed of light. At everyday speeds, these effects are negligible and can be approximated using classical physics. However, when dealing with particles or objects moving at high velocities, such as in particle accelerators or astrophysics, the relativistic effects on phase shift, frequency, and energy must be taken into account for accurate calculations and predictions.