21 January 2024
By Soumendra Nath Thakur.
There is always a recognized place for scientists, but the science they discover or theorize is the main consideration, because science is about advancing scientific understanding and not the place of scientists.
I need to point out that it was relativity that challenged Newtonian time and promoted relativistic spacetime but it is now certain that the promotion of relativistic time and therefore spacetime is a flawed proposition. Whereas relativistic spacetime is based on Einstein's own definition of time and space as spacetime but it is now certain that Einstein's time like relativity is a flawed representation of time and therefore relativity is based on a flawed interpretation of spacetime that cannot be fully repaired. .
On the other hand Newtonian abstract time is still meaningful in all scientific applications. This means that abstract time can still be considered applicable for all scientific and applied purposes whereas Einstein's relativistic time is flawed given its imposed natural aspects. Clearly time is not natural.
In fact, the relativistic misrepresentation of time is very likely to shake the rest of the relativistic foundations because they are based on the misrecognition of time, hence spacetime, where Newtonian time is applied by Earth's space agency with flying colours for all applicable purposes.
Therefore, science is more relevant here than the places occupied by scientists.
#time #abstracttime #relativistictime #flawedtime #flawedrelativistictime
