Redefining 'Nothing': A Scientific Perspective on the Universe's Creation.

Soumendra Nath Thakur 

December 13, 2024

Religious individuals who strictly believe in divine creation often reject the idea that scientific laws, such as gravity, could spontaneously create the universe from nothing. Similarly, many philosophical thinkers argue that 'something' cannot emerge from 'nothing,' asserting that nothingness inherently lacks the capacity to produce existence.

However, both perspectives tend to overlook the nuanced interpretation of 'nothing' in an inter-dimensional context. As three-dimensional beings, our perception is inherently limited, and what we define as 'nothing' might merely reflect our inability to detect phenomena beyond our dimensional framework. For instance, dimensions below the Planck scale, imperceptible to human senses and instruments, might harbour vibrational energies, such as strings, which are mathematically plausible but empirically unverifiable due to our limitations.

This perspective is further supported by the understanding that the universe appears as a continuously fluctuating field of matter whose quanta are fermions, i.e., leptons and quarks, and a force field whose quanta are bosons, i.e., photons and gluons. All of these fields have zero-point energy. Even at absolute zero, atoms and molecules maintain some vibrational motion, known as zero-point energy. Moreover, the empty space of a vacuum also exhibits these properties. This suggests that what we perceive as 'nothing' is far from an empty void; instead, it is imbued with subtle, energetic fluctuations that could serve as the foundation for the emergence of existence.

In this light, the universe's creation from 'nothing,' as we perceive it, aligns with a scientific understanding that what appears as 'nothing' may, in fact, be a subtle, energetic substrate capable of generating existence.

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. "It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.

Stephen Hawking"

Exploring Energy, Existence, and Hypothetical Dimensions

December, 2024

Dear Mark Jagg,

Thank you for your intriguing perspective. Here's my opinion based on the points raised:

Existence as Vibration or Oscillation:

I agree with your assertion that all forms of existence, whether energetic or mass-based, inherently involve vibration or oscillation. This aligns with the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, where oscillations and wave-like properties underpin reality. The Planck equation provides strong evidence for this energy-frequency relationship, reinforcing the notion of "existence vibration."

Primordial Energy and Dimensionality:

The idea of primordial energy existing without spatial dimensions resonates with theoretical physics, particularly in models that describe the pre-Big Bang state. While this phase remains hypothetical due to the lack of direct evidence, it is not speculative. The suggestion that energy must have a minimum dimension (frequency) adds a logical foundation to this hypothesis.

Energy as Trans dimensional:

The concept of energy manifesting across dimensions, as suggested by its wave-particle duality, holds merit. This "trans dimensional" nature can be viewed metaphorically, reflecting energy's adaptability in different frameworks. However, this idea would benefit from further clarification and rigorous theoretical development.

Dimensional Hopping Between EM and Mass Spectra:

I must respectfully challenge this idea, as it lacks empirical support. The photon is not composed of quarks, and it does not contain mass in the way that matter does. The electromagnetic spectrum and the mass spectrum operate on distinct principles, with photons being massless and non-convertible to mass. This "hopping" concept appears to misrepresent energy's interaction between these spectra.

Electro-Evolution and Atomic Structure:

The role of electromagnetic processes in shaping atomic structures is well-supported by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. This idea aligns with our understanding of the early universe's chemistry and the formation of the first elements.

Hydrogen as the First Atomic Element:

This statement is scientifically consistent, as hydrogen is indeed the simplest and most abundant element in the universe, formed shortly after the Big Bang.

In summary, while some aspects of your hypothesis align with established scientific principles, others, like "dimensional hopping," require more substantial evidence to gain acceptance. The idea of energy's inherent vibration and its foundational role in existence is both compelling and scientifically plausible.

Warm regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur