My strong feeling is that Einstein's theories of relativity do not represent a pure and dedicated scientific work. Although his works are fundamental in character, and they are of a very high level - this is why his work should have included considerable self-observation and experimentation - as we see in the dedicated works of Max Planck and other scientists. Rather, Einstein's theories of relativity seem to derive from or refer to the work of other scientists.
Since Einstein's works are highly contextualized by the work of other scientists, and his work is less original, it is unfortunate and problematic that any scientific review or criticism of Einstein's work that seeks to falsify it must first accurately falsify the work of other scientists, only then will it be possible to begin attempts to falsify any of Einstein's works.. This would not have been the case if Einstein's theory of relativity had been Einstein's original work. Einstein seems to have carefully formulated his theories of relativity so that attempts to falsify them are not easy.
Relative
time is derived from relative frequency. It is the phase shift in relative
frequency due to the infinitesimal loss of wave energy and the corresponding
increase in the wavelength of oscillation; which occurs at any clock between
relative positions due to the relativistic effect or difference in
gravitational potential; result error in the reading of clock time; which is
incorrectly represented as time dilation.
As
T=1/f,
1°
phase shift = T/360 = (1/f)/360.
For
a wave of frequency f = 5 MHz, we get the phase shift (degrees °).
=
(1/5000000)/360
=
(5.55x10^-10)
=
555 ps.
- Planck
time ~ 5.39×10^−44 seconds
- Planck
length ~ 1.61626×10^−35 m
- Therefore,
c =~3x10^8 m/s
Einstein's theory of special relativity claims to take away the independence of time and make time 'natural', where the proper time (t) depends on the gravitational effect or relativistic effect and is expressed as t < t' where t' is time dilation, contradicting this expression The classical mechanics expression is t = t' where time (t, t') is absolute.
Einstein's
equation of time dilation is wrong as it is a conjectural equation based on the
classical Doppler formula. The experimental results given below refute the conjectural
equation of time dilation and have been able to disprove it altogether. The
theory of special relativity states that the proper time (t) is dependent on
the relativistic effect expressed as t < t' where t' is the time dilation.
Real
events invoke time. The drawback of the time dilation equation t՚ = t/√(1-v²/c²)
is that the gravitational or relativistic effect of real phenomena can never
correspond to the proper time (t) - referred to in the fourth dimension. This
means that the real part of the equation {1/√(1-v²/c²)} cannot affect or
interact with the proper time (t) so, the dilated time (t’) does not enlarge
but remains the same as in the proper time (t)., as in the expression is t = t'.
Experiments
carried out in electronic laboratories on piezoelectric crystal oscillator show
that the waves are consistent with time variations due to relativistic effects.
We
find that the wavelength λ of a wave is directly proportional to the period of
the wave, i.e. λ ∝ T derived from the wave equation f = 1/T = v/λ = E/h where the
wavelength λ of a wave is directly proportional to the period T.
Where,
the time interval T(deg) for 1° phase is inversely proportional to the
frequency (f). We get a wave associated with time change.
For
example, a 1° phase shift in a 5 MHz wave corresponds to a time change of 555
picoseconds (ps). The evidence is:
As
we know, 1° phase shift = T/360.
Therefore,
for a 1° phase shift for a wave of wavelength λ = 59.95m, and frequency f = 5
MHz, the time shift (time delay) Δt = 555 ps (approx).
Furthermore,
for a 360° phase shift or, 1 complete cycle for a wave with a frequency of 1Hz
(of a 9192631770 Hz wave); Time shift (time delay) Δt =
0.0000001087827757077666 ms (approx).
Cesium-133
atomic clock time change on GPS satellites in space:
For
a 1455.50003025° phase shift (or, 4.043055639583333 cycles) of the 9192631770
Hz wave; Time variation (time delay) Δt = 0.0000004398148148148148 ms (approx)
or, 38 microseconds are taken per day.
Conclusion: Wavelength enlargement of clock
oscillations due to relativistic effects, or gravitational potential
differences in clock mechanisms caused similar errors in clock time readings,
erroneously represented as time dilation. Time dilation is rather wavelength
dilation.
My
opinion about space and time: I think that space is rather a three-dimensional
(x, y, z) mathematical concept, where real force fields exist and interact,
rather than a fabric of space-time. Nothing interact space or time. There are
only inter-energetic field interactions.
By interprating Max Planck, the velocity limit of a gravitationally bound object is: There is
a certain speed limit to which gravitationally bound objects can travel.
However, such a constraint does not apply to metric expansion within
intergalactic space affected by antigravity caused by dark energy; whose
effective mass, as it appears, is less than zero (<0).
Max
Planck showed us that anything above a threshold frequency becomes meaningless
to us. The Planck length is the smallest possible length beyond which the
application of known laws of physics becomes meaningless. So that the Planck
length is the limit where frequency can be meaningful to us, but beyond that
limit any wave frequency that carries information will be imperceptible to us.
Accordingly,
the velocity of electromagnetic waves or light is equal to one Planck length
per Planck period; The limit at which a gravitationally bound object can
travel. This value is equal to c.
So,
before relativity came into existence, Planck's law could have determined the
speed of light.
