Absolute time versus relative time: - in terms of frequency and mass respectively

Summery of the following post:

The following post reflects that if time is seen in respect of varied frequencies of energy=frequency under gravitational differences (instead of considering energy-mass under gravitational differences), we will get varied time due to varied frequencies under different gravitational conditions. This will lead us to relative time due to relative frequencies in said gravitational difference.
However, the universe in entirety has a specific time relative to its beginning; this time is absolute time ticking at a constant rate for the entire universe and everything in it.

That considering an experiment that uses two identical crystal oscillator electronic clocks, set exactly to the same time, one clock stayed on Earth, while the other flew in an airplane. The crystal oscillators has been used  in the clocks so that crystal oscillators have much better frequency stability than mechanical clocks and any effect in its signal characteristics can easily be determined.

While the gravitational waves show its frequency can be attohertz (aHz) or micro hertz (µ Hz) or as high as in low frequency range of radio waves. Sound frequency (20 Hz–20 kHz) travels at 343 m/s in air and radio frequencies 3KHz to 300 GHz, even in is lower range, travels at approximately 300000 km/s but the gravitational wave only travels approximately 300000 km/s in space within its gravitational field.

Moreover, in general relativity gravitational red-shift (also known as Einstein shift), is the phenomenon in which electromagnetic waves or photons travelling out of a gravitational well will lose energy resulting the photon's longer wavelength affecting by the gravity. Therefore, the gravity will apply a mechanical stress to the fast moving crystal by affecting its frequency causing longer wavelength, so the clock on the fast moving airplane will be slightly behind the clock on the ground. 

The time interval for 1° of phase is inversely proportional to the frequency. If the frequency of a signal is given by f, then the time t_deg (in seconds) corresponding to 1° of phase is t_deg = 1 / (360f) = T / 360. Therefore, a 1° phase shift on a 5 MHz signal corresponds to a time shift of 555 pico-seconds.

However, Planck's equation E=hv, where v=frequency (Hz) and h=6.626 070 15 x 10^-34 J Hz^-1 represents relationship between energy and frequency, where 'h' is universal constant, as such even in absence of speed (speed, as universal constant, as shown in a relationship between energy 'E' and mass 'm' in the theory of special relativity E = mc²) unknown  for such frequencies under consideration, we can easily go ahead with such frequencies of the energy and determine respective frequencies between its relative locations so that the frequency differences would enable us to determine their relative time, of course due to the varied effect of gravity.

Therefore, it is inevitable that the relative time are the slices of the absolute time is what time actually is, ticking at a constant rate for the entire universe and everything in it.

History of Plank Equation:

Max Planck observing the spectrum of black body radiation postulates that electromagnetic energy could be emitted only in quantized form and assumed that radiation change its energy (E) in minimal increment was proportional to the frequency (v) of its associated electromagnetic wave. Accordingly in 1900, Max Planck derived a formula “E=hv" where 'h' is Planck's constant (action quantum), 'ν' is the frequency of the radiation. In 1905, Albert Einstein determined a 'quantum' or minimal element of the energy of the electromagnetic wave itself. The light quantum behaved in some respects as an electrically neutral particle, and was eventually called a photon. Physicists now call these quanta photons, and a photon of frequency 'ν' will have its own specific and unique energy. The total energy at that frequency is then equal to 'hν' multiplied by the number of photons at that frequency.

 Note: What actually happened in the experiment as can be seen in the relationship λ∝T. The experiment actually considered dilated wavelength and not dilated time. If the experiment is considered that it observed dilation of time then it will violate fundamental properties of time. It rather miscalculated T instead of λ, because by appropriately changing either of the value of λ or even the value of T, one will get same result. But the illegality would be considering T as gravity affected factor instead of appropriately considering λ as the gravity affecting factor. A λ can be influence by gravity and change its wavelength but none can change T with the effect of  gravity as time is not something changeable by any external influence or interaction unless such changes is in the structure of the events itself, then only time comes into a relative consideration with the changeable events. Time does not participate in any eventual act rather time tracks changes in the events. So a question of changing time is not only absurd but is illegal too as per valid definition and properties of time. Time dilation necessarily needs to be wavelength dilation, when λ∝T comes in to the consideration.

 
#AbsoluteTime #AbstractMathematics #AbstractScience #EnergyFrequency #EnergyFrequencyInteraction #EnergyGravityInteraction #EnergyMass #Frequency #FrequencyGravityInteraction #GeneralRelativity #GravitationalRedShift #Gravity #Mass #MassGravityInteraction #MechanicalStress #OriginPoint #PlankEquation #PlanksEquation #Reality #Redshift #RelativeTime #Space #SpecialRelativity #Time #TimeDilation #Wavelength #WavelengthDilation