25 December 2024

A Dual Framework for Rest and Motion States: Energy and Mass Dynamics in Extended Classical Mechanics.


Soumendra Nath Thakur
Tagore's Electronic Lab, W.B, India; postmasterenator@gmail.com or
postmasterenator@telitnetwork.in

December 25, 2024

Abstract:

This study explores the foundational equations of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), offering a comprehensive framework for analysing energy and force interactions across distinct scenarios involving matter mass (Mᴍ), apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ), and effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ). Key equations are presented, including the force equation, effective mass definition, and total energy balance. Two cases are examined: stationary objects with positive matter mass (Mᴍ > 0) and moving objects with zero matter mass (Mᴍ = 0). For the former, total energy is dominated by potential energy, with no contribution from kinetic energy. In contrast, the latter involves negative effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ<0) and energy dynamics primarily governed by kinetic energy, with potential energy contributing negatively. The findings highlight the duality of energy and mass interactions and provide novel insights into phenomena such as massless object behaviour and their interaction with gravitational fields.

Keywords: Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), Matter Mass (Mᴍ), Apparent Mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ), Effective Mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ), Energy Dynamics, Negative Effective Mass, Photon-Gravitational Interactions, Rest and Motion States,

1. Introduction:

In classical mechanics, the relationship between mass, energy, and force has been a foundational concept, traditionally explored through the framework of Newtonian mechanics and Einstein's theory of relativity. However, these classical approaches often encounter limitations when addressing scenarios involving massless or seemingly paradoxical objects, such as photons, or when applying general relativistic concepts to specific gravitational interactions. The Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) framework offers a novel perspective by introducing new interpretations of mass, force, and energy, particularly focusing on the interplay between matter mass (Mᴍ), apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ), and effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ).

The ECM framework presents a dual perspective on energy and mass dynamics, distinguishing between two distinct states: rest and motion. In the first case, when an object is at rest and no external force is acting on it, the total energy is entirely attributed to its potential energy, with the effective mass mirroring the matter mass. In the second case, when an object with zero matter mass (e.g., a photon) is in motion, its energy dynamics are governed by kinetic energy and a corresponding negative potential energy term, driven by negative effective mass. This dual framework allows for a more comprehensive understanding of energy and mass dynamics, especially in the context of objects in motion or interacting with gravitational fields.

By revisiting core principles of mass-energy relationships, the ECM framework offers an alternative model for understanding energy exchanges in both traditional and non-traditional scenarios, including the behaviour of massless entities in gravitational fields. This approach challenges and extends the conventional views of force, mass, and energy in classical mechanics, providing fresh insights into the behaviour of objects with varying mass characteristics, from stationary bodies to dynamic, massless entities.

This paper explores the key equations and implications of the ECM framework, illustrating how it integrates the concepts of kinetic and potential energy in both rest and motion states, and highlighting its potential applications in furthering our understanding of gravitational dynamics and energy-mass interactions.

2. Mathematical Presentation:

The Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) equations provide a framework for understanding energy and force interactions in various scenarios, particularly involving matter mass (Mᴍ), apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ), effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ), and their interplay. The key equations are as follows:

Force Equation: 

F = (Mᴍ −Mᵃᵖᵖ)·aᵉᶠᶠ

• This describes the net force as a function of matter mass, apparent mass, and effective acceleration.

Effective Mass 

Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)

• This defines the total effective mass as the sum of the matter mass and the negative apparent mass.

Total Energy

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴍᴍ + KEᴍᴍ 

• The total energy is the sum of potential energy (PEᴍᴍ) and kinetic energy (KEᴍᴍ).

These equations encapsulate the dynamics of objects in different states, from rest to motion, and provide a basis for analysing scenarios where forces, energies, and mass interact in novel ways.

Interpretation and Analysis:
These presentations articulate two distinct cases within the Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) framework. Below is an analysis and interpretation of the scenarios:

Case 1: When F = 0
• Condition: Mᴍ > 0; aᵉᶠᶠ = 0 (no effective acceleration.)

Implication:
• The object possesses positive matter mass (Mᴍ > 0).
• Since the net force is zero, the object is stationary or in stable equilibrium within a gravitational or other force field.
• The potential energy (PEᴍᴍ) is the sole contributor to the total energy:

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴍᴍ 

• The effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) equals the matter mass:

Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ

Conclusion: For an object at rest (F = 0), kinetic energy (KEᴍᴍ) does not exist independently; the total energy is entirely attributed to the potential energy of the object.

Case 2: When F < 0 and Mᴍ = 0
• Condition: Mᴍ = 0; Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0 (negative effective mass).

Implication:
• The object has no matter mass (Mᴍ = 0).
• The negative force (F < 0) arises due to the negative apparent mass (−Mᵃᵖᵖ).
• The effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) is purely negative, determined by the apparent mass:

F = −Mᵃᵖᵖ·aᵉᶠᶠ. Where: Mᵉᶠᶠ = −Mᵃᵖᵖ;

Effective Mass:
• The effective mass is defined by the energy-frequency relation:

Mᵉᶠᶠ = h·f/c² = E/c² 

Where:
• h is Planck's constant, 
• f is the frequency, 
• E is the total energy, and 
• c is the speed of light.

This relationship highlights the equivalence of energy and effective mass and how the effective mass of a massless entity, such as a photon, is linked to its energy and frequency.

Total Energy:

• Kinetic energy (KEᵉᶠᶠ) becomes the dominant contributor to the total energy, with a negative correction term from the potential energy (PEᵉᶠᶠ) associated with the effective mass:

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᵉᶠᶠ + KEᵉᶠᶠ

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = √{(Mᵉᶠᶠ·c²)² + (p·c)²} 

This equation expresses the total energy as a combination of contributions from the energy due to effective mass and the momentum of the system.

• Conclusion: 
For an object in motion with zero matter mass (Mᴍ = 0), its energy dynamics are governed by kinetic energy (KEᵉᶠᶠ) and a negative potential energy term (PEᵉᶠᶠ). The presence of negative effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0) drives the observed motion and energy 

Overall Conclusion
For objects with Mᴍ > 0, kinetic energy (KEᴍᴍ) cannot exist independently when the object is at rest; only potential energy (PEᴍᴍ) contributes to the total energy.

For objects with Mᴍ = 0 (e.g., photons or other massless entities), the negative effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ <0) results in a total energy balance dominated by kinetic energy, with potential energy contributing negatively.

Interpretation
This interpretation emphasizes the duality in energy dynamics within the ECM framework. It showcases the interplay between positive matter mass (Mᴍ) and negative apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ), and how their contributions influence the object’s motion and total energy. For massless objects, such as photons, the ECM framework provides an alternative explanation for their interactions with gravitational fields, including the negative effective mass and its associated energy exchange.

3. Discussion:

The framework presented in this research introduces a novel interpretation of mass, energy, and force interactions, offering insights into how energy dynamics differ based on an object's state—whether at rest or in motion. By examining two key states—rest (when no force is acting) and motion (especially for massless entities)—the ECM framework provides a fresh perspective on classical mechanics and its potential applications.

I. Energy in the Rest State:
In the ECM framework, when an object is at rest and no external force is applied (i.e., when F=0), the object exhibits a purely potential energy-driven state. Here, the potential energy (PEᴍᴍ) is the only contributor to the total energy (Eₜₒₜₐₗ), and kinetic energy (KEᴍᴍ) does not exist independently. The equation Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴍᴍ holds true for objects with positive matter mass (Mᴍ > 0), where the effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) simply equals the matter mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ). This distinction highlights how an object’s total energy can be governed solely by its potential energy when stationary or in a stable equilibrium.

This interpretation challenges conventional views of energy conservation, which generally assert that both kinetic and potential energies contribute to an object’s total energy. In ECM, energy is partitioned based on the object's state, emphasizing the importance of rest states in understanding energy contributions that are usually neglected.

II. Energy in the Motion State:
When an object with zero matter mass (Mᴍ =0) is in motion, such as a photon or other massless entities, the dynamics shift significantly. In this state, the object is governed by kinetic energy, with a negative correction term arising from the associated potential energy related to the negative effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ = −Mᵃᵖᵖ). The effective mass is driven entirely by the apparent mass, which introduces a unique dynamic for objects in motion.

The equation Eₜₒₜₐₗ = KEᵉᶠᶠ + PEᵉᶠᶠ encapsulates this state, where the kinetic energy (usually associated with mass) exists in the absence of traditional rest mass. Moreover, the total energy in this state is affected by the interaction between kinetic and potential energy terms. The negative value of effective mass introduces a counteracting effect, which could explain certain phenomena that classical mechanics struggles to describe, such as the behaviour of photons in gravitational fields or their response to other forces.

This shift in how mass and energy interact in motion supports the ECM’s potential to provide an alternative understanding of dynamics in scenarios involving massless or near-massless particles. It suggests that the apparent mass of objects, especially massless particles, plays a critical role in determining their energy dynamics. The concept of negative effective mass offers a way to reconsider the motion of these particles without relying on traditional ideas of mass.

III. Negative Effective Mass:
A central feature of the ECM framework is the concept of negative effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0), which emerges in Case 2, when an object with zero matter mass is in motion. This introduces a novel understanding of how massless particles (e.g., photons) interact with forces and gravitational fields. Negative effective mass can potentially explain why certain phenomena, like gravitational lensing or the bending of light near massive objects, may not align perfectly with classical interpretations. It presents a new avenue to understand gravitational dynamics, where the interaction between energy and mass is not governed by the standard positive mass framework.

In this context, negative effective mass could also suggest the possibility of new force dynamics that are not adequately addressed by traditional Newtonian or relativistic mechanics. The force generated by an object with negative mass is counterintuitive, potentially leading to repulsive interactions or behaviour that deviates from expected norms in classical theories.

IV. Applications and Implications for Gravitational Dynamics:
The ECM framework’s reinterpretation of energy and mass provides a fresh approach to understanding gravitational interactions, particularly with massless entities. The concept of energy exchange between kinetic and potential energy in massless particles can offer an alternative explanation for gravitational lensing, photon redshift/blueshift, and other phenomena related to light’s behaviour in a gravitational field.

Moreover, the negative effective mass dynamic opens the door for rethinking gravitational force. In ECM, an object with zero matter mass but negative effective mass could behave in unexpected ways when interacting with gravitational fields, potentially leading to modifications of existing theories, such as those based on general relativity. This could have profound implications for the understanding of dark matter, dark energy, and other unexplained cosmic phenomena, where traditional models fall short.

V. Energy-Mass Duality:
Ultimately, the ECM framework establishes a duality between rest and motion states, showing that the relationship between energy, mass, and force is contingent upon the state of the object. While rest states focus entirely on potential energy, motion states emphasize kinetic energy, with novel corrections due to the interaction between apparent and effective mass. This dual framework provides an enhanced understanding of energy dynamics, particularly in the case of massless objects or those with unconventional mass properties.

In conclusion, the ECM framework offers a more comprehensive view of mass-energy interactions, where the state of an object determines its energy distribution. The insights gained from this framework could be pivotal for advancing theories in gravitational dynamics, quantum mechanics, and the behaviour of massless particles, providing a deeper understanding of the universe’s fundamental forces.

4. Conclusion:

The Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) framework introduces a transformative perspective on the relationship between energy, mass, and force, offering a dual interpretation of objects in rest and motion states. By distinguishing the energy dynamics of stationary objects with positive matter mass (Mᴍ >) and massless objects with negative effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0), the ECM framework provides a more nuanced understanding of how energy is partitioned between potential and kinetic components.

In the rest state, the total energy is solely derived from potential energy, with kinetic energy being absent, as demonstrated by objects where F=0. Conversely, for objects in motion, particularly massless entities like photons, the total energy is governed by kinetic energy and a negative correction term due to the influence of apparent mass, revealing how massless particles interact with forces differently than traditionally understood.

The concept of negative effective mass introduces new possibilities for explaining gravitational dynamics and the behaviour of light in gravitational fields, such as gravitational lensing and photon redshift. By re-evaluating the roles of energy and mass, ECM offers a potential framework to address phenomena unexplained by classical mechanics and general relativity.

In summary, the ECM framework provides a robust and alternative approach to understanding mass-energy interactions, paving the way for deeper insights into gravitational dynamics, quantum theories, and the behaviour of massless particles. It challenges established paradigms and proposes a new avenue for exploring fundamental forces in the universe, contributing to the ongoing development of more comprehensive physical theories.

Funding: No specific funding was received for this work.
Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.

5. References: 

[1] Chernin, A. D., Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G. S., Teerikorpi, P., Valtonen, M. J., Byrd, G. G., & Merafina, M. (2013). Dark energy and the structure of the Coma cluster of galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 553, A101. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220781
[2]Classical Mechanics, by Herbert Goldstein in the Journal of the Franklin Institute, 250 (3), 1950, doi:10.1016/0016-0032(50)90712-5
[3] Modern Physics by Kenneth S. Krane
[4] Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume I. The California Institute of Technology, Michael A. Gottlieb and Rudolf Pfeiffer. https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_toc.html
[5] Ling, S. J., Sanny, J., Moebs, W., Friedman, G., Druger, S. D., Kolakowska, A., ... & Wheelock, K. (2016). University Physics Volume 2. https://assets.openstax.org/oscms-prodcms/media/documents/UniversityPhysicsVolume3-WEB.pdf
[6]Thakur, S. N. (2024). Extended Classical Mechanics: Vol-1 - Equivalence Principle, Mass and Gravitational Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1190.v3 
[7]Thakur, S. N. (2024) Photon Dynamics in extended classical mechanics: Effective mass, negative inertia, momentum exchange and analogies with Dark Energy. doi:10.20944/preprints202411.1797.v1
[8]Thakur, S.N. (2024) A symmetry and conservation framework for photon energy interactions in gravitational fields. doi:10.20944/preprints202411.0956.v1
[9]Thakur, S.N. (2024) Photon interactions with external gravitational fields: True cause of gravitational lensing. doi:10.20944/preprints202410.2121.v1.

24 December 2024

Response to a commenter's Misinterpretation:


Soumendra Nath Thakur 
December 24, 2024

Your reference to "density of space" reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept of density, violating its very definition. Density is defined as the measure of how tightly packed a material is, expressed as the mass of a substance per unit volume. While "volume of space" is a valid term, "density of space" is incorrect because space is not a material entity and does not possess mass.

Furthermore, your statement, "anything that expands or contracts, its density decreases or increases," is a flawed analogy. The expansion of distance, as discussed in my post, is a linear phenomenon and does not involve volumetric changes. Measuring distance does not equate to measuring volume, rendering your analogy inapplicable to the concept of increasing distances between galaxies.

Additionally, my post does not reference or account for the density of matter or galaxies. Yet, you have misrepresented it by imposing the idea of "density of matter taking galaxies into account," which my post never addressed. This misrepresentation undermines the context and intent of my argument.

To clarify, the recession of galaxies signifies an increase in the distances between them—a linear increment—not a volumetric mass increase, as you incorrectly implied by referencing density changes.

Your comment fails to address the substance of my argument and instead misinterprets it with irrelevant and baseless counterpoints. I recommend understanding the message of my post more thoroughly before attempting to counter it.

Galactic Recession: Expansion of Distance, Not Spacetime.


Soumendra Nath Thakur 
December 24, 2024

Massive objects, such as galaxies, observed to recede from one another due to the anti-gravitational force exerted by dark energy. This force acts in a manner opposite to gravity, which pulls massive objects closer together. Both phenomena involve changes in the distances between physical objects within space over time. 

This perspective challenges and invalidates the concept of spacetime expansion, emphasizing instead the expansion of distances between galaxies within the universe.

Space as a Framework, Not a Physical Medium:


Soumendra Nath Thakur 
December 24, 2024

A medium is traditionally defined as the intervening substance through which sensory impressions are conveyed or physical forces are transmitted. However, space is not a physical substance; it does not serve as a medium in this sense. Electromagnetic propagation, therefore, requires no physical medium between its emission and reception. Instead, space represents the dimensions of height, depth, and width within which all things exist and move. It is not a medium but a framework within which existential events occur.

Emphasizing ECM Interpretation of Relativistic Mass as Effective Mass:

December 24, 2024.

Dear Mr. Lewis,

Thank you for your continued interest and engagement in the discussion of my research. Your contributions reflect an active inquiry into foundational aspects of physics, and I appreciate the opportunity to address them.

Core Framework of my Research:
The research paper, 'Relativistic Mass and Energy Equivalence: Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity,' explores the variability of mass and its impact on mass-energy equivalence. While it operates within the context of special relativity, it is interpreted through the lens of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) to establish a refined framework for analysing mass-energy relationships. Specifically, the term effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) in ECM provides a unifying concept that bridges relativistic mass (m′) with apparent mass (mᵃᵖᵖ) and the variability of matter mass (mᴍ). 

1. Relativistic Mass (m′) as Effective Mass (mᵉᶠᶠ):
• In the context of ECM, relativistic mass (m′) is represented as effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ), which integrates the variability arising from apparent mass (mᵃᵖᵖ). 
• This framework highlights that relativistic mass (m′) manifests not merely as a velocity-dependent quantity but also as a dynamic interplay of mass variability and energy exchange.

2. Energy-Mass Equivalence in ECM:
• The effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) captures the relativistic energy dynamics by unifying the rest mass (m₀) with variability induced by apparent mass (mᵃᵖᵖ).
• This provides an enriched perspective compared to the classical relativistic equation E=m′c², extending its application to dynamic systems governed by ECM principles.

Addressing Your Comments

1. Wave Nature of Light and Space as a Medium:
While your assertion that light is a wave in the medium of space is thought-provoking, it diverges from the framework of ECM and the focus of this research. The ECM framework does not address the existence of a medium for light propagation but instead interprets photon behaviour through effective forces and energy exchanges, such as the incorporation of negative apparent mass in photon dynamics. 

2. Electron, Proton, and Neutron as Looped Waves:
The hypothesis of subatomic particles as looped waves in a medium, though innovative, lies outside the ECM framework, which does not challenge the quark model or introduce alternative structural interpretations of matter. Instead, ECM focuses on refining force and energy equations for particles, emphasizing variability in mass and energy under relativistic and classical conditions.

3. Rejection of Quarks and Balmer Formula Interpretation:
While your conclusions about quarks and the Balmer formula propose a reinterpretation of quantum mechanics, these ideas are not pertinent to the ECM framework or the specific discussion of relativistic mass equivalence. The paper does not address quantum-level structural analyses or alternative cosmological models.

Why Your Response is Irrelevant:

Your recent response introduces concepts that are not aligned with the specific objectives of the paper, including:

1. Unrelated Frameworks:
• The hypothesis of a wave medium and looped wave particles shifts the discussion away from the ECM interpretation of relativistic mass and effective mass.

2. Scope of the Paper:
• The research focuses exclusively on mass-energy equivalence through the ECM lens, not on alternative theories of particle or wave dynamics.

3. Absence of Engagement with ECM Principles:
• Your response does not address the core ECM principles, such as the role of apparent mass (mᵃᵖᵖ) in effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) or the dynamic variability of matter mass (mᴍ).

Conclusion
While your insights provide an alternative perspective, they are not directly relevant to the specific objectives or findings of this research paper. I encourage discussions that engage with the ECM interpretation of mass-energy equivalence, particularly the integration of relativistic mass as effective mass (mᵃᵖᵖ) and its implications for energy dynamics.

Thank you for your understanding and engagement. I look forward to further discussions that align with the ECM framework and the principles outlined in the research.

Best regards,
Soumendra Nath Thakur
Researcher