Experimental Evidence for Negative Mass and Theoretical Implications:

"What experiment has been done to verify the existence of negative mass?"

Soumendra Nath Thakur
December 20, 2024

1. The Context of Negative Apparent Mass:

The concept of negative apparent mass (−Mᵃᵖᵖ) differs fundamentally from intrinsic negative mass. It arises as a contextual property, emerging from the equations of effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) under extreme conditions. The term "apparent" signifies that this property is not an inherent attribute of the particle but is instead influenced by external factors.

Key insights include:

• Apparent mass: A dynamic result influenced by energy, momentum, and the interplay with external forces, not a static characteristic of matter.

• Negative apparent mass: Emerges under specific conditions, particularly when the energy contributions from potential and kinetic dynamics surpass the rest mass energy.

This theoretical framework aligns with phenomena where gravitational dynamics deviate from classical predictions, including dark energy interactions.

Reference: Observational research by A.D. Chernin et al., "Dark Energy and the Structure of the Coma Cluster of Galaxies," supports the interpretation of dark energy dynamics in systems where apparent mass plays a role.

2. "Matter to Antimatter" Transition:

The proposed transition from matter to antimatter-like behaviour under extreme conditions is unconventional but extends the understanding of particle dynamics. When negative apparent mass dominates, the following occurs:

• Structural disintegration: Negative apparent mass exerts pressure that challenges the electron's structural integrity. This pressure increases as the electron's velocity approaches the speed of light (c), rendering its rest mass negligible. This is a consistent mathematical prediction of physical consequences.

• Transition dynamics: The effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) becomes dominated by (−Mᵃᵖᵖ), leading to repulsive (antigravitational) effects. The electron no longer adheres to conventional matter dynamics.

• Antigravity effects: As negative apparent mass dominates at light's speeds, repulsion from gravitational sources occurs. This behaviour aligns with the theoretical underpinnings of antimatter-like states in extreme conditions.

3. Gravitational Bound Systems and Structural Breakdown:

The inability of matter to survive as conventional matter at light's speeds in gravitationally bound systems highlights the interplay between −Mᵃᵖᵖ, and matter M:

• Increasing speed and Mᵃᵖᵖ: As the electron accelerates, Mᵃᵖᵖ grows while matter M diminishes. A tipping point is reached where structural forces are overwhelmed.

• Collapse or dissipation: At this point, the electron ceases to behave as traditional matter. Instead, it transitions to state resembling antimatter, characterized by antigravitational interactions.

4. Supporting Evidence and Theoretical Alignment:

While direct experimental validation of negative apparent mass remains an open frontier, theoretical consistency with extended classical mechanics offers promising pathways for exploration:

• Alignment with dark energy dynamics: The interpretation of negative apparent mass mirrors the influence of dark energy on cosmic expansion, as shown in the work of A.D. Chernin et al.

• High-energy phenomena: Observations of high-energy particles near black holes or data from particle accelerators could provide indirect evidence of these transitions.

5. Transition to Antimatter-like Behaviour:

The transition described is not conventional antimatter (as defined in particle physics, with opposite charge but identical mass). Instead, it represents a novel state governed by:

• Negative effective mass: This leads to repulsion from gravitational sources, creating antigravity effects.

• Dynamic behaviour under extreme at light's speeds, conventional properties of matter cease to apply, resulting in a fundamentally different state of existence.

Conclusion:

The theoretical framework for the "Matter to Antimatter" transition provides a robust model for understanding high-energy dynamics and structural transformations under extreme conditions. While experimental validation is pending, its consistency with extended classical mechanics and alignment with observed phenomena (e.g., dark energy effects) support its plausibility. Further research and experimentation are essential to substantiate these claims and deepen our understanding of particle behaviour near the speed of light.

Invalidating Relativistic Time Dilation: A Re-assessment of Time, Measurement Errors, and Cosmic Time.

Soumendra Nath Thakur 

ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

December 16, 2024

The explanation of time as presented in relativity is widely regarded as the best description of time, primarily due to its reliance on relativistic principles. This interpretation has remained influential and largely unchallenged since the publication of Einstein's theory of special relativity in 1905. However, recent research and advancements in scientific understanding challenge the relativistic notion of time.

Einstein's dismissal of the classical interpretation of time in favour of the relativistic framework went unopposed for decades. Yet, contemporary findings suggest that time does not dilate in the manner proposed by relativity. Instead, any perceived alteration in the natural progression of time should be treated as an error in time measurement rather than an actual dilation. Furthermore, the concept of time dilation inherently invites its counterpart—time contraction—when the influencing factors are reversed. This duality contradicts the fundamental principle that the scale of time (∆t) must remain constant. Any deviation, whether a dilation (t′) or contraction (-t′), leads to errors in time measurement, as standard clock mechanisms cannot accommodate these variations. A dilated time scale (∆t+t′) exceeds the standard scale, while a contracted time scale fails to complete it.

For instance, the clock face represents a fixed 360° cycle, symbolizing the uniform progression of time. A dilated time cannot fit within this 360° framework, while a contracted time would fall short of completing the cycle, resulting in measurement inaccuracies. Furthermore, while clock time is a representation of cosmic time, the relativistic interpretation focuses solely on clock time and violates the very essence of cosmic time.

Cosmic time is defined as the continuous and irreversible progression of existence and events through the past, present, and future, regarded as an integrated whole. It exists beyond spatial dimensions in the fourth dimension and progresses without reversal. Relativity, however, imposes an artificial ordering of events based on natural time, failing to recognize that existential events invoke conceptual time rather than natural time.

My research, supported by mathematical formulations and experimental evidence, challenges this relativistic perspective. I have explored time distortion through piezoelectric oscillator experiments, the human perception of time, and the role of entropy in defining time. These studies highlight flaws in the experiments supporting time dilation, which were biased and employed improper techniques. Instead of identifying the true cause of errors—namely, distortions in the wavelength of oscillations—these experiments prematurely concluded that time dilation was occurring.

Wavelength, being directly proportional to the time period, shows that errors in wavelength lead to errors in time measurement—not to time dilation. Relativistic time dilation fails to account for this fundamental relationship and overlooks the broader context of wavelength distortion, which is a more general phenomenon. Consequently, the concept of relativistic time dilation is fundamentally flawed in its understanding of time and its measurement. Time dilation is rather error in time reading.

Redefining 'Nothing': A Scientific Perspective on the Universe's Creation.

Soumendra Nath Thakur 

December 13, 2024

Religious individuals who strictly believe in divine creation often reject the idea that scientific laws, such as gravity, could spontaneously create the universe from nothing. Similarly, many philosophical thinkers argue that 'something' cannot emerge from 'nothing,' asserting that nothingness inherently lacks the capacity to produce existence.

However, both perspectives tend to overlook the nuanced interpretation of 'nothing' in an inter-dimensional context. As three-dimensional beings, our perception is inherently limited, and what we define as 'nothing' might merely reflect our inability to detect phenomena beyond our dimensional framework. For instance, dimensions below the Planck scale, imperceptible to human senses and instruments, might harbour vibrational energies, such as strings, which are mathematically plausible but empirically unverifiable due to our limitations.

This perspective is further supported by the understanding that the universe appears as a continuously fluctuating field of matter whose quanta are fermions, i.e., leptons and quarks, and a force field whose quanta are bosons, i.e., photons and gluons. All of these fields have zero-point energy. Even at absolute zero, atoms and molecules maintain some vibrational motion, known as zero-point energy. Moreover, the empty space of a vacuum also exhibits these properties. This suggests that what we perceive as 'nothing' is far from an empty void; instead, it is imbued with subtle, energetic fluctuations that could serve as the foundation for the emergence of existence.

In this light, the universe's creation from 'nothing,' as we perceive it, aligns with a scientific understanding that what appears as 'nothing' may, in fact, be a subtle, energetic substrate capable of generating existence.

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. "It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.

Stephen Hawking"

Exploring Energy, Existence, and Hypothetical Dimensions

December, 2024

Dear Mark Jagg,

Thank you for your intriguing perspective. Here's my opinion based on the points raised:

Existence as Vibration or Oscillation:

I agree with your assertion that all forms of existence, whether energetic or mass-based, inherently involve vibration or oscillation. This aligns with the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, where oscillations and wave-like properties underpin reality. The Planck equation provides strong evidence for this energy-frequency relationship, reinforcing the notion of "existence vibration."

Primordial Energy and Dimensionality:

The idea of primordial energy existing without spatial dimensions resonates with theoretical physics, particularly in models that describe the pre-Big Bang state. While this phase remains hypothetical due to the lack of direct evidence, it is not speculative. The suggestion that energy must have a minimum dimension (frequency) adds a logical foundation to this hypothesis.

Energy as Trans dimensional:

The concept of energy manifesting across dimensions, as suggested by its wave-particle duality, holds merit. This "trans dimensional" nature can be viewed metaphorically, reflecting energy's adaptability in different frameworks. However, this idea would benefit from further clarification and rigorous theoretical development.

Dimensional Hopping Between EM and Mass Spectra:

I must respectfully challenge this idea, as it lacks empirical support. The photon is not composed of quarks, and it does not contain mass in the way that matter does. The electromagnetic spectrum and the mass spectrum operate on distinct principles, with photons being massless and non-convertible to mass. This "hopping" concept appears to misrepresent energy's interaction between these spectra.

Electro-Evolution and Atomic Structure:

The role of electromagnetic processes in shaping atomic structures is well-supported by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. This idea aligns with our understanding of the early universe's chemistry and the formation of the first elements.

Hydrogen as the First Atomic Element:

This statement is scientifically consistent, as hydrogen is indeed the simplest and most abundant element in the universe, formed shortly after the Big Bang.

In summary, while some aspects of your hypothesis align with established scientific principles, others, like "dimensional hopping," require more substantial evidence to gain acceptance. The idea of energy's inherent vibration and its foundational role in existence is both compelling and scientifically plausible.

Warm regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur

Clarification on Photon Mass and Energy Transfer in Atomic Absorption:

Photons are gauge bosons, not made of quarks, so they do not have rest mass. When a photon is absorbed by an electron in an atom, it transfers its energy to the electron, but the photon itself ceases to exist in its original form. However, the photon always remains as energy, even though it doesn't have mass in the traditional sense. A phonon, which is a quasiparticle representing quantized vibrations in a lattice, is also distinct from photons and doesn't have mass either.

Key Clarifications:

• Photon and mass: While photons have no rest mass, they do carry energy and momentum, which are related to their frequency and wavelength.
• Phonon: Phonons are not the same as photons. They are quasi-particles arising from lattice vibrations in a material and also do not have rest mass, but they are fundamentally different from photons.