Black hole - hints of invariable space and time:

A black hole is not only a region of space with an intense gravitational field, where all fundamental interactions unified as "intense gravity", since events apparently stop in the black hole.

However, space and time become meaningless in non-eventual existence, so I have valid reasons to accept that distortion of spacetime cannot occur in their own absence.

Here, there can be no general gravity except "strong gravity," - general gravity; which we know from general relativity, where spacetime is covariant.

The space of the eventual universe is not the space of non-eventual black hole, irrespective of any effects of black hole is noticeable in universal space.

However, the realisation of the statement implies the invariant parameters of both space and time.

#blackhole #Intensegravity #noneventualstate #invariantspace #invarianttime

Arguments referring atomic clock supports time dilation is error, not dilated time:

It's interesting to find that Einstein published his paper on special relativity in 1905 and someone submitted that atomic clocks support time dilation, funny.

When the atomic clock was invented in 1945, how could a paper in 1905 rely on an atomic clock experiment discovered in 1945? Did the author use a time machine?

Listen, the practice is that when someone submits a scientific theory, even in applied science, the author himself has to show valid experimental results to support a claim, such as time dilation.

Obviously the author of Special Relativity never provided valid experimental results in support of time dilation. So author essentially failed to claim time dilation in his paper because he did not provide valid experimental results supporting time dilation when he submitted his paper on special relativity.

So I wonder, how did time dilation come about in the 1905 publication of spatial relativity without a supporting test for time dilation?

Also, the mathematical representation of time dilation that the author gave is bad, for physical gravitational effects or even speed dilating time (which is a mathematical parameter). Physical influences cannot modify conceptual time. Men do not marry a ghost wife!

However, the most interesting fact about the atomic clock mentioned is that it defines the frequency of specific atom representing unit of time in the SI system, and is therefore frequency, not speed or gravitational potential difference, corresponding time.

This means that Relativistic speed  or gravitational potential differences cannot represent time and so nor its dilation, unless they are considered as external influences that can cause distortions of time. Also other effects such as temperature variations or mechanical misalignment of clocks etc.

Neither of these effects causes time dilation but causes errors in the clock oscillation, resulting in timing errors.

This is exactly what my paper showed how time dilation is illegal.

Therefore, the atomic clock is the correct example to represent what is time and what is dominant error, but not time dilation. Time is not something to stretch.

Reference Relativistic effects on phase shift on frequencies invalidate time dilation Ii

Difference between conjectural relativistic time dilation and general wave distortion in clock oscillation:

Whether time dilation is wrong or right, but for the sake of argument here, I will consider the proposition of time dilation in terms of relativistic effects, i.e. speed or gravitational potential differences.

The orbital speed of a GPS satellite is not the relative speed with respect to the Earth. It is the angular velocity of a GPS satellite relative to the center of the Earth and is measured in degrees or radians. Angular velocity is the time rate at which an object rotates about an axis, or the angular displacement between two bodies changes.

The orbital speed of a satellite is not a consideration in relativistic time dilation involving relative motion, and angular velocity does not apply to time dilation because it considers either relative motion or gravitational potential difference. In relativistic time dilation, a moving object with respect to an observer on Earth requires a relative motion.

The time dilation equation 𝑡՚ = 𝑡/√(1− 𝑣²/𝑐²) applies to the relative motion of an object moving relative to an observer on Earth.

GPS satellites orbit about 20,000 km from Earth and are affected by relativistic effects due to the gravitational potential difference between the Earth observer and the satellite. Therefore, there is a relative gravitational potential difference between the GPS satellite and the observer on Earth.

The gravitational potential difference is greater with a GPS satellite in space than with an observer on Earth, so that the gravitational force is greater with an observer on Earth than with a GPS satellite in space. Due to the weakening of gravity, satellite clocks run about 45 microseconds a day faster than Earth clocks. Therefore, on balance, the clocks of GPS satellites in space run about 38 microseconds a day faster than the clocks of GPS receivers on Earth. This is called gravitational time dilation. Whereas, the angular speed of GPS satellites, in degrees, is not calculated in gravitational time dilation.

The gravitational time dilation equation is different from the time dilation equation due to motion. The gravitational time dilation of a GPS satellite or any other gravitational time dilation equation includes the gravitational constant (G) and the distance between the centers of objects (r), where G = 6.67×10¯¹¹ Nm²/kg², the gravitational time dilation equation is, T' = T/√1−2GM/rc², where (T') is the time interval affected by (Earth) gravity; (t) is the time interval (GPS satellite) unaffected by gravity; (M) is the mass of the Earth, (G) is the gravitational constant, (r) is the distance between the centers of objects and (c) is the speed of light (299792458m/s).

However, according to my scientific findings and experiments, my paper concern deals with relativistic covariant spacetime invalidating covariant time dilation and space. Since, time and space have no physical properties but they are only mathematical parameters, time cannot be expanded, and my experiments confirm that the loss of energy due to relativistic effects enlarges the wavelength of the clock's oscillation, which corresponds to incorrect time but relativity appears incorrectly. This error as time expands. Time dilation is actually an error in timing due to wavelength distortion.

The time interval T(deg) is inversely proportional to the frequency, for a 1° phase, we get a wave associated with time change. 1° phase shift = 𝑇/360 = (1/𝑓)/360. Time delay for 1° phase shift with frequency of 5 MHz and wavelength of 59.95 m,

𝛥𝑡 = 555 𝑝𝑠.

The GPS satellite's cesium-133 atomic clock orbits at an altitude of 20,000 km with a time delay of 38 microseconds per day.

Time delay for a 1455.5° phase shift or 4.04 Hz. With a frequency of 9192631770 Hz,

𝛥𝑡 = 0.00000010878 m𝑠. So 38 microseconds per day.

Reference: Relativistic effects on phase shift in relative frequencies invalidate time dilation.

Dismissal of objectionable filing against scientific paper entitled, "Relativistic effects on phase shift in frequencies invalidate time dilation II."

 Mr. Quilling, 

You continue to display your preconceived intellectual dishonesty, even after my reminders against it.

Also your preconceived exposition that says, "... the author's proposal contradicts the established understanding of time dilation ...,"

(1) When your statement fails to appreciate the premises stated in the author's paper, entitled, "The relative effect of phase shift on frequency invalidates time dilation II."

In particular, experiments with piezoelectric crystal oscillators have shown that due to the difference in relativistic effect, the resulting G-force distorts the frequency through a phase shift of the clock oscillation, showing a distorted time scale in line with the distorted wavelength of the wave, which shows an error in reading the clock time. Which is rather wrongly represented as time dilation.

Not appreciating the facts mentioned above, or not raising legitimate encounters against the tests mentioned in the author's paper, will be considered as acts of actual dishonesty by the commenter.

(2) Moreover, the commenter fails to appreciate that the author's paper ascribes the freedom of time to robbery. As recognized in the relativity paper. And relativity does not rule out classical abstract time, but arbitrarily relativizes time as normal which is subject to relativistic effects.

(3) Furthermore, the commenter fails to realize that previous experiments with time dilation by experimenters were incorrect and biased, as the author's paper notes, that physical wavelength distortions exactly correspond to conceptual time distortions; Through the relation λ∝T, while biased experimenters have not tried to find out that the wavelength λ is actually distorted and hence the distorted value of time T (usually t'), i.e. without distortion at wavelength λ, time (T) cannot be distorted. The warped wavelength λ is relevant here, not the time warp.

In addition, experimenters fail to realize that existential events invoke time from the conceptual progression of time, not the other way around. Because they made this deliberate mistake because they were too biased towards Einstein's statement of God, and not what proper science should be, although it was their natural duty as examiners of important scientific evidence.

(4) In addition to the above grounds, the paper contains many scientifically valid encounters that disprove the idea of time dilation, but they are not mentioned here to limit this answer.

Therefore, considering the above facts and circumstances, it appears that the commenter's comments are completely preconceived, on his own thoughts of relativity, and therefore he is absent from the facts stated in the author's paper and hence his arguments are against the author's paper. His complaint is that the author's proposal is inconsistent with time dilation. These comments by the commenter are based not only on guesses and assumptions, but also on the commenter's untrue, preconceived notions.

The commenter has failed to establish a valid scientific basis against the author's paper. Accordingly the above commenter is thrown in the dustbin and his complaint is dismissed.

The matter has now been settled.

Reference: https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.22492066.v2

- Soumendra Nath Thakur (Author).

Effects of phase shift in frequency against period of time:

Instantaneous phase (ϕ) represents an angular shift between two sine waves and is measured in degrees (or radians). 

A sine wave and a cosine wave are 90° (π/2 radians) out of phase with each other.

After a period of time Δt, two sine waves initially synchronized in phase but differing in frequency by Δω degrees (or radians) per second will develop a differential total phase shift (ΔΦ).

Given by the equation: ΔΦ = Δω × Δt.