16 June 2025

The Four Faces of Mass in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM):

Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) redefines mass into distinct, interconnected concepts to explain its mass-re-configurative model of energy. This section breaks down each definition. Understanding these is key to grasping the entire framework.

Matter Mass (Mᴍ)
The total, original mass of a system before any energetic transformations. It's the complete material content from which all other mass components are derived or redistributed.

Displaced Mass (ΔMᴍ)
The portion of matter mass that is physically displaced to manifest as kinetic energy. It is the mass-equivalent of motion itself.

Effective Mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ)
The residual mass that remains after displacement. It's responsible for gravitational potential energy. Calculated as Mᴍ − ΔMᴍ.

Apparent Mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ)
A conceptual mass defined as the negative of displaced mass (ΔMᴍ). It's primarily used to describe the dynamics of light-speed particles like photons.

The Foundational Equations
The relationships between the different mass concepts are formalized in a set of core equations. These equations provide the mathematical backbone for ECM, ensuring dimensional consistency while describing total energy as a function of mass redistribution.

Total Energy as Mass Redistribution
The conceptual heart of ECM, showing that total mass is conserved by partitioning it into potential (effective) and kinetic (displaced) components.

        Eₜₒₜₐₗ ⇒ (Mᴍ − ΔMᴍ) + ΔMᴍ

Full Energy Equation
The practical formula for calculating total energy, using effective mass for both potential and kinetic terms.

        Eₜₒₜₐₗ = Mᵉᶠᶠgᵉᶠᶠh + ½Mᵉᶠᶠv²

Photon Energy (Light-Speed Dynamics)
ECM derives the energy of a photon non-relativistically, defining it as being equivalent to its displaced mass.

        hf = ΔMᴍc²

Public Announcement Appendix 10: Pre-Universal Gravitational and Energetic Conditions in ECM

🌌 Public Announcement | ECM Update

📅 June 15, 2025
📍 Tagore's Electronic Lab
🧠 Research by: Soumendra Nath Thakur

🔬 New Appendix Published:
Appendix 10: Pre-Universal Gravitational and Energetic Conditions in ECM
📄 Read Now


🔍 What Is It About? 

Where did the universe come from before the Big Bang?
This new research paper explores that very question—not through assumptions about singularities, but by tracing the energy dynamics and mass patterns that existed even before stable particles formed.

According to the Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) framework, the early universe was filled with potential energy, which began to flow and redistribute in very specific ways. As energy transitioned, it gave rise to something unexpected: negative mass effects, or what we experience today as dark energy.

Instead of a violent explosion from nothing, this view suggests a structured emergence—a phase where energy borrowed from itself, set things into motion, and gradually unfolded the cosmos into matter, motion, and gravity.


🧠 Key Highlights in Simple Terms:

  • The universe began not with a bang, but with flowing energy and no matter.

  • Dark energy may come from negative apparent mass—a kind of gravitational ghost.

  • Early expansion happened with superluminal speed (faster than light), but in a structured, lawful way.

  • Stable atoms and real mass emerged gradually from these early energy structures.


🔗 Explore the ECM Series:

  1. Appendix 7: Photon Emission in ECM

  2. Appendix 8: Beyond Planck Thresholds

  3. Appendix 9: Cosmic Genesis & Gravitation

  4. Appendix 10: Pre-Universal Energetics


✉️ For Collaboration & Inquiries

📧 postmasterenator@gmail.com
🏛️ Tagore's Electronic Lab, West Bengal, India

15 June 2025

Release Announcement | ECM Appendix 9: Cosmic Genesis and Gravitational Descriptions.

🌌 Release Announcement | ECM Appendix 9

Soumendra Nath Thakur | Tagore's Electronic Lab, India
📘 ECM's Cosmic Genesis and Gravitational Descriptions
🆕 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13289.40801
📅 June 15, 2025

🔭 What if the Universe didn’t begin with a bang... but with a vibration?
Appendix 9 of the Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) series introduces a bold new idea: the Universe may have started not from a singular explosion, but from a calm and timeless field of potential energy—a kind of cosmic “hum.”

This pre-universe didn’t contain matter or particles. It was a state of pure potential, gently vibrating. Then, something shifted: a portion of that potential energy redistributed itself, setting the stage for motion, structure, and the expansion of space itself.

This model proposes:

  • The Big Bang as a transformation of pure energy—not a creation from nothing

  • Gravity emerging from energy gradients—not just from mass

  • Dark energy as a real consequence of this early energetic displacement

  • And matter as a product of deeper energy restructuring

ECM provides a new language to describe how the universe evolved—from vibration to motion, from energy to matter.

This is not just a new theory—it’s a rethinking of where everything begins.
🌐 Read the full appendix: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13289.40801

#ECM #CosmicGenesis #Physics #VibrationalUniverse #DarkEnergy #SoumendraNathThakur #ScientificFramework

14 June 2025

Gravitational Collapse, Quantum Boundaries, and the Planck Threshold: A Clarification from ECM

Soumendra Nath Thakur | June 14, 2025

In response to a thoughtful question by Carmen Wrede on whether the Planck scale functions as a universal resolution limit, even in low-gravity or flat regions of spacetime, I wish to clarify the ECM position:

📌 In Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), the Planck scale is not viewed as a fixed “pixel size” of space. Rather, it is a latent energetic threshold—one that only becomes physically relevant when energy, frequency, or gravitational force approach extreme, near-infinite conditions.

🌀 It is not operative in regions of minimal curvature or low energy. Space remains continuous and force-defined until the Planck frequency

flank2.999×10⁴²Hz

is approached. Only then does spacetime collapse into pure kinetic oscillation—beyond which classical and quantum constructs dissolve.

🔁 In ECM, the Planck domain is a transformative boundary, not a constitutive one. It signals a point where all known forces unify, mass ceases, and energy becomes the sole physical currency, vibrating in a zero-dimensional state beyond structure.

🧠 This perspective aligns in spirit with Roger Penrose’s proposal that wavefunction collapse is gravitational, but goes further: in ECM, wavefunctions no longer apply beyond this threshold—only persistent energetic logic remains.

Further Reading:

📄 Appendix 8: Energetic Structures Beyond Planck Threshold and the Breakdown of Classical Action
🔗 http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35283.28960

🧾 Supplement A to Appendix 8: Gravitational Collapse of Quantum States and the Planck Threshold as a Classicalizing Boundary
🔗 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392666360_Supplement_A_to_Appendix_8_Gravitational_Collapse_of_Quantum_States_and_the_Planck_Threshold_as_a_Classicalizing_Boundary

📘 Supplement B to Appendix 8: Interpretive Boundaries of the Planck Scale in Low-Energy and Flat-Space Regimes
🔗 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392666477_Supplement_B_to_Appendix_8_Interpretive_Boundaries_of_the_Planck_Scale_in_Low-Energy_and_Flat-Space_Regimes

#ECM #QuantumGravity #PlanckScale #PenroseCollapse #GravitationalThreshold #SoumendraNathThakur #ExtendedClassicalMechanics #PhysicsFrontiers

13 June 2025

Appendix 8: Energetic Structures Beyond Planck Threshold and the Breakdown of Classical Action.

Soumendra Nath Thakur
Tagore's Electronic Lab, WB, India

Abstract

In classical physics, the relationship  defines work as force acting through space, and quantum theory introduces the Planck constant  as the fundamental quantum of action. However, both frameworks become inadequate at frequencies approaching the Planck limit . Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) introduces a refined energetic domain where spacetime, mass, and classical action cease to function as defining constructs. This appendix presents a critical re-examination of action, frequency, and energy interactions beyond the Planck threshold. It describes the transition into a regime of super-Planckian energetic oscillations, where particle identity is lost, potential energy is instantly rendered kinetic, and only energetic wave behaviour remains. Importantly, this framework preserves energy conservation, albeit through abstract, non-quantized means, proposing a new proportionality constant k where h fails. Connections to published ECM materials and quantum-gravitational unification are included to support this conceptual and mathematical extension of physical theory.

1. Classical and Quantum Action Breakdown

In standard mechanics, physical work is defined as:

Fs

And in quantum mechanics, action is characterized by:

∼ Eor ∼ px

However, these frameworks both fail to accurately describe energy interaction at or beyond the Planck frequency threshold. At this scale, ECM shows that space and time are no longer stable constructs and classical action loses physical applicability. Instead, energy transforms instantly into a purely kinetic vibrational field, and conventional particulate carriers of momentum or mass cease to exist.

2. Energetic Environment Beyond Planck Scale

At the Planck boundary:

  • Rest mass collapses; no material particle structure persists.

  • Spacetime decomposes into non-local vibratory states.

  • Potential energy cannot remain latent; it converts directly into immediate kinetic manifestation.

  • Conservation of energy persists but not via classical measurable action.

This corresponds to a regime defined by:

Δf− fᴘₗₐₙₖ during t− tᴘₗₐₙₖ

Here, Planck's constant  can no longer serve as a useful quantum of action. Instead, ECM postulates a separate constant , governing super-Planckian transitions, which are described by pure oscillatory existence.

3. Unified Gravitational Field and Pre-Spacetime Oscillation

In this state:

  • Energetic density approaches infinity.

  • Gravitational influence becomes unbounded and self-unified.

  • No classical force or rest mass structure exists.

  • All known physical laws break down—except the principle of energy persistence.

ECM redefines this realm as a zero-dimensional oscillatory continuum, where:

  • Time exists only as cyclical recurrence.

  • Frequency becomes the sole parameter of physical distinction.

  • Propagation trends toward superluminal oscillation—not via signal transmission, but via pure geometric vibration.

4. Physical Meaning of Super-Planckian Frequencies

Planck frequency fᴘₗₐₙₖ 1/tᴘₗₐₙₖ does not mark the upper bound of energetic phenomena but rather signifies a dimensional transition zone. Observable high-frequency radiation such as:

  • Ultra-high-energy gamma rays (e.g., 
    ∼ 10²⁸ Hz lies far below this threshold.

  • Beyond this, hyper frequencies may exist within a non-local, pre-physical substratum—functionally invisible under classical spacetime observation.

5. ECM Position: Beyond h, Beyond Mass, Beyond Force

ECM maintains:

  • Conservation of energy continues beyond Planck boundaries.

  • New constants must replace h in describing such energetic domains.

  • Planck’s constant is a threshold, not a finality.

ECM thereby unifies gravitational, quantum, and energetic phenomena through oscillatory logic, not particulate behaviour.

List of ECM Appendices and Annexures

Appendix A – Standard Mass Definitions in ECM
Appendix 3 – Fundamental Total Energy in ECM
Appendix 4 – Negative Apparent Mass and Mass Continuity in ECM
Appendix 5 – Temporal Modulation vs Temporal Scale Variation in ECM
Appendix 6 – Angular-Time Correspondence in ECM
Supplement A – Interpretive Basis and Conclusion to Appendix 6
Supplement A2 – External Commentary on Supplement A
Appendix 7 – ECM-Specific Framework for Photon Sourcing and Emission Pathways
Appendix 8 – Energetic Structures Beyond Planck Threshold and the Breakdown of Classical Action

Primary References (from Appendix 8 content)

  1. Thakur, S. N. (2025). Appendix 3: Fundamental Total Energy in ECM. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21532.19841

  2. Thakur, S. N. (2025). Mass-Energy Transformations in ECM. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24863.27040

  3. Thakur, S. N. (2025). Periodicity and Phase Shift Dynamics between the Big Bang and Planck Time. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29274.25285

  4. Thakur, S. N. (2024). Description of Planck Equation and Energy-Frequency Relationship. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375416343

  5. Thakur, S. N. (2024). Unified Quantum Cosmology: Exploring Beyond the Planck Limit with Universal Gravitational Constants. https://doi.org/10.32388/26u31c

  6. Thakur, S. N. (2024). Why is 1° time interval (T) the smallest meaningful mathematical expression of the Planck frequency? https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32358.40001

  7. Thakur, S. N. (2023). Quantum Scale Oscillations and Zero-Dimensional Energy Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36320.05124

  8. Thakur, S. N. (2023). Energy Persistence Beyond Planck Scale. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375488896

Additional References

• Thakur, S. N. (2025). Appendix A – Standard Mass Definitions in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31762.36800
• Thakur, S. N. (2025). Appendix 4 – Negative Apparent Mass and Mass Continuity in ECM. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10264.92165
• Thakur, S. N. (2025). Annexure 5 – Temporal Modulation vs Temporal Scale Variation in ECM. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35784.64009
• Thakur, S. N. (2025). Appendix 6 – Angular-Time Correspondence in ECM. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33048.51200
• Thakur, S. N. (2025). Supplement A to Appendix 6 – Interpretive Basis and Conclusion.
• Thakur, S. N. (2025). Supplement A2 – Commentary on Supplement A.
• Additional references to standard photon physics, emission spectra, and synchrotron mechanisms as discussed in astrophysics literature (NASA, CERN reports, etc.)