January 30, 2026
Within the Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) framework, phase lag corresponds to an observed time delay, whereas phase advance corresponds to an observed time advance. In both cases, the directly measurable quantity is the accumulated time shift relative to a reference clock, while clock time itself remains strictly positive, cyclic, and normalized to the local oscillatory standard.
Although phase shifts in ECM may be positive (phase advance) or negative (phase lag), clock-based observations record only the resulting time offset. Consequently, both phase advance and phase lag manifest operationally as time delays, with the directionality of the underlying effect encoded in the inferred phase or frequency relationship rather than in the clock time itself.
This operational nuance highlights why ECM may initially appear to differ from conventional physical interpretations. The apparent contradiction is not a failure of consistency, but a consequence of ECM’s explicit separation of conceptual variables—phase, frequency, and clock time—that are typically conflated in classical and relativistic frameworks. When these distinctions are properly accounted for, ECM reproduces all known experimental results while providing a phase-based, observer-accessible description of gravitational phenomena. In this view, ECM is not an alternative to physics; it is a refined framework that reveals the hidden structure of phase, time, and frequency interactions in gravitational fields.
No comments:
Post a Comment