28 January 2024

Kinetic and Relativistic Energy in Classical Mechanics:

28 January 2024
Soumendra Nath Thakur.
ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

Introduction:

In classical mechanics, kinetic energy is KE = ½mv², where m is mass and v is velocity. So mass multiplied by the square of the speed is an energy. The concept of energy plays a fundamental role in understanding the behaviour of objects in motion. One of the key forms of energy is kinetic energy, which is intimately linked to an object's mass and velocity. Additionally, in the realm of relativity, Einstein's famous equation E = mc² introduces a profound understanding of energy in terms of mass and the speed of light. This discussion aims to delve into the classical expression for kinetic energy KE = ½mv² and its connection to relativistic energy.

Kinetic Energy in Classical Mechanics:

Kinetic energy (KE) is defined as the energy possessed by an object due to its motion. In classical mechanics, this energy is quantified by the equation KE = ½mv², where m represents the mass of the object and v denotes its velocity. This formula illustrates that kinetic energy is directly proportional to the mass of the object and the square of its velocity. Notably, the SI unit of kinetic energy is the joule (J), reflecting its fundamental role in measuring energy in classical mechanics.

Relativistic Energy and E = mc²:

Albert Einstein's theory of relativity revolutionized our understanding of energy, mass, and the speed of light. One of the most iconic equations in physics is E = mc², where E represents energy, m denotes mass, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum (3 × 10⁸  meters per second). This equation reveals that mass can be converted into energy, and vice versa, highlighting the intrinsic connection between the two. Notably, the equation implies that mass itself possesses energy simply by virtue of its existence, as indicated by the term mc².

Conclusion:


In classical mechanics, kinetic energy is KE = ½mv². So mass multiplied by the square of the speed is an energy. Kinetic energy elucidates the energy associated with the motion of an object, dependent on its mass and velocity. Meanwhile, Einstein's theory of relativity introduces the concept of relativistic energy through E = mc², emphasizing the inherent energy residing in mass. Together, these principles provide a comprehensive understanding of energy in both classical and relativistic contexts, shaping our comprehension of the universe's fundamental workings.


Keywords: Classical mechanics, Kinetic energy, Newton's mechanics, Relativity, Mass-energy equivalence, Einstein's equation


27 January 2024

Harmonizing Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles: A Synopsis of India's Constitutional Balance:

The relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution of India is crucial and reflects the balance between individual liberties and the broader goals of social and economic justice. Here's an overview of these concepts:

Fundamental Rights:

Fundamental Rights are enshrined in Part III of the Constitution (Articles 12 to 35).

These rights are considered essential for the development of the individual and guarantee civil liberties and freedoms.

They include rights to equality, freedom of speech, right against exploitation, freedom of religion, cultural and educational rights, right to property (though this has been amended), and the right to constitutional remedies (Article 32 for the Supreme Court and Article 226 for High Courts).

Directive Principles of State Policy:

Directive Principles are enshrined in Part IV of the Constitution (Articles 36 to 51).

They provide guidelines for the state to formulate policies and laws for the establishment of a just and welfare state.

These principles are non-justifiable, meaning that the courts cannot enforce them directly. However, they are fundamental in the governance of the country, and it is the duty of the state to apply these principles while making laws.

Harmonizing Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles:

The Constitution makers intended a harmonious construction between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.

While Fundamental Rights are enforceable through legal remedies (e.g., writs under Article 32), Directive Principles are not justifiable on their own.

However, the judiciary can consider the violation of Directive Principles while examining the constitutionality of laws. If a law violates both Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, it may be declared unconstitutional.

Remedy under Article 32/Article 226:

The quoted statement you provided suggests that for a court to intervene in an administrative order, the petitioner must not only show a violation of Directive Principles but also demonstrate a violation of their Fundamental Rights.

This highlights the need for a petitioner to establish a connection between the violation of Directive Principles and the infringement of their Fundamental Rights for the court to provide a remedy.

Evolution of Constitutional Law:

The interpretation of the Constitution has evolved over time through judicial decisions, and the courts have played a significant role in defining the interplay between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.

In summary, the Constitution of India aims for a balance between individual rights and the broader socio-economic goals, and the judiciary plays a vital role in interpreting and upholding these constitutional principles.

#ConstitutionofIndia

Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy in India:

I remember reading in a Central Government library in the mid-nineties about the remedy of Fundamental Rights in the Constitution of India, for violation of any provision under the Directive Principles of State Policy.

It is stated as quoted below,

"The Court will not interfere into an administrative order; however erroneous, if not challenged on the grounds of contravention of Fundamental Rights."

It is further explained that in making a case under Article 32/Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it is incumbent upon the petitioner not only to prove that any provision under the Directive Principles of State Policy has been violated but also to prove that his Fundamental Rights have been violated.

Seven main Fundamental Rights were originally provided by the Constitution – the right to equality, right to freedom, right against exploitation, right to freedom of religion, cultural and educational rights, right to property and right to constitutional remedies.

The Constitution lays down certain Directive Principles of State Policy, which though not justifiable, are 'fundamental in governance of the country', and it is the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws.

Wherein, the guiding principles of state policy stipulate that the State shall strive to promote the welfare of people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may, a social order, in which justice-social, economic and political-shall form in all institutions of national life.

#ConstitutionofIndia #FundamentalRights #RemedyUndertheConstitution

26 January 2024

Exploration of Abstract Dimensions and Energy Equivalence in a 0-Dimensional State:

(Continued).
26 January 2024
Soumendra Nath Thakur.
ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

Abstract:

This theoretical exploration delves into the intricacies of abstract dimensions and energy dynamics within a 0-dimensional state. The journey begins by challenging conventional notions, asserting that even in a seemingly dimensionless state, conceptual directions and orientations can be attributed. This perspective lays the groundwork for understanding the transition from a non-eventful 0-dimensional state to a realm where kinetic events unfold, leading to the emergence of spatial dimensions. The study aligns with mathematical concepts, emphasizing the consistency of interpretations in abstract forms. Despite the breakdown of physics at the Planck scale, the formulation of models enables a scientific understanding of the early universe, underlining the significance of the Big Bang model.

The focal point shifts to the foundational role of natural numbers in pure mathematics, where non-eventful, 0-dimensional associated locational points form an ordered lattice-like structure. This abstract spatial arrangement reflects the inherent properties and relationships explored independently of specific physical contexts. The narrative then transitions to dynamic oscillations within a non-eventful 0-dimensional space, revealing the generation of potential energy through collective, infinitesimal periodic oscillations along specified axes.

A mathematical representation is introduced to describe the infinitesimal potential energy change in the 0-dimensional state, highlighting the interplay of constants, displacement, and equilibrium points. The exploration further extends to potential energy points and periodic oscillations, providing a conceptual framework for understanding the behaviour of points in a theoretical 0-dimensional space.

Lastly, the study introduces the optimal state and energy equivalence principle, emphasizing the advantageous conditions where specific energy components manifest while maintaining total energy equivalence. Energy density is introduced as a measure of energy per unit volume, contributing to a comprehensive framework for understanding energy transitions in the optimal state under the condition of vanishing potential energy.

This abstract offers a condensed overview of the theoretical journey, encompassing abstract dimensions, mathematical foundations, dynamic oscillations, and optimal states within a 0-dimensional context. The exploration aims to contribute to the broader understanding of the theoretical origins and complexities inherent in such abstract and non-eventful states.

Keywords: 0-Dimensional State, Energy Equivalence Principle, Abstract Dimensions, Natural Numbers, Potential Energy, Optimal State,

Energy Dynamics in 0-Dimensional State:

(II)

In the realm of cosmology, an eventless or non-eventful, non-energetic, 0-dimensional origin point (pâ‚’₀) takes centre stage within the pre-universe state. This fundamental concept, represented by the 0-dimensional point (pâ‚’₀), delineates a theoretical landscape preceding the existence of the universe. Characterized as a fixed point entrenched in absolute stillness and devoid of dynamic or kinetic energy, the 0-dimensional point assumes the role of the origin within this conceptual space, acting as the foundational reference point for the potential emergence of spatial dimensions or events. Beyond its theoretical abstraction, this point serves as a theoretical anchor in cosmological discussions, providing a framework to explore hypothetical conditions leading to the universe's origin. In its state of non-eventual stillness and devoid of spatial expansion, the 0-dimensional point becomes a pivotal concept, unlocking insights into the theoretical origins of the universe within the vast expanse of cosmological exploration.

Originating in a pre-universe state, the hypothesis delves into the profound concept of a fixed, non-energetic, 0-dimensional point. The realization of this hypothesis presents a perspective on the fixed, non-energetic, 0-dimensional origin point (pâ‚’₀) as a fundamental concept in cosmological discussions. This conceptual framework serves as a theoretical cornerstone, offering valuable insights into the hypothetical conditions that led to the origin of the universe.

The term 'non-eventful' within this hypothesis refers to a state characterized by absolute stillness and tranquillity, devoid of any events or changes. This static condition forms the foundation for the emergence of the universe, as inferred through mathematical formulations. The term establishes a state of primordial passivity, providing a crucial backdrop for theoretical formulation and contributing to our understanding of the pre-universe state.

Similarly, 'non-energetic' extends the concept of a static environment by indicating the absence of energy or kinetic forces. This absence implies a state where energy remains un-manifested, devoid of any dynamic forces at play, resulting in a lack of motion or activity. This reinforces the notion of a quiescent and inert pre-universe state, contributing to the overall characterization of the origin point.

The concept of '0-dimensional' enriches our understanding by describing a point without spatial extension or dimension. This theoretical abstraction accentuates the infinitesimal nature of the original positional point (pâ‚’₀), lacking length, width, or height. This emphasis on abstract characteristics aligns with the proposed static and non-energetic properties, deepening our comprehension of the foundational point.

The term 'original locational point (pâ‚’₀)' takes on heightened significance within this hypothesis, representing not only an initial reference point but also a foundational point within conceptual space. This point serves as a crucial anchor for the emergence of spatial dimensions and events, providing a pivotal reference for cosmological discussions. The interplay of this concept with the notion of a fixed, non-dynamic point profoundly influences our understanding of theoretical frameworks and the conditions leading to the origin of the universe.

The inclusion of the 'pre-universe state' adds a temporal dimension to the description, placing the concept within a theoretical context that predates the existence of the universe. This positioning underscores a state prior to cosmic events, spatial dimensions, or physical laws, aligning seamlessly with the overarching theme of a pre-universe state as the canvas for the ultimate emergence of the universe. In essence, this refined hypothesis provides a comprehensive and nuanced exploration of the intricate conditions surrounding the origin of the universe.

Natural Numbers: Foundations in Pure Mathematics:

(III)

In pure mathematics, the natural numbers, symbolized by the set â„• = {1, 2, 3, …}, stand as fundamental entities, serving as the foundational elements for constructing other number systems and mathematical structures. These non-eventful, non-energetic, 0-dimensional associated locational points, denoted as (pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•), are carefully arranged in planes extending infinitely in all directions around the original point in a lattice-like form within the pre-universe state. '(pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•)' succinctly represents the associated locational points with the subscript â‚“ ranging from 1 to infinity, emphasizing the ordered and repeating structure of the arrangement, as conveyed by 'arranged in planes extending infinitely in all directions' and 'in a lattice-like form.' The notation â‚“ ∈ â„• signifies that the variable â‚“ belongs to the set of natural numbers, representing a mathematical expression where â‚“ can take values from the set {1, 2, 3 …}. This abstract spatial arrangement mirrors the ordered and repeating structure emphasized by the term 'lattice-like.' In the abstract landscape of pure mathematics, where numbers and operations are explored independently of specific physical contexts, mathematicians look for the inherent properties and relationships underlying these natural numbers. While finding practical applications across various mathematical domains, the abstract nature of natural numbers allows for extensive exploration and understanding beyond specific real-world situations, aligning with the core principles of pure mathematics.

In this version:

'(pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•)' succinctly represents the associated locational points with the subscript â‚“ ranging from 1 to infinity.
'Arranged in planes extending infinitely in all directions' conveys the spatial arrangement around the original point.
'in a lattice-like form' emphasizes the ordered and repeating structure of the arrangement.

The notation â‚“ ∈ â„• represents a mathematical expression, where â‚“ is an element of the set of natural numbers, denoted by â„•. The set of natural numbers is typically defined as the positive integers starting from 1 and continuing indefinitely (1, 2, 3 …). The symbol ∈ denotes 'belongs to' or 'is an element of.'

So, 'â‚“ ∈ â„•' means that the variable â‚“ takes values from the set of natural numbers. In the context of your original statement, it's used to express that the index 'â‚“' can take values from the set of natural numbers, including 1, 2, 3, and so on, up to infinity.

In this context:

Natural numbers can be used in abstract form within the realm of pure mathematics. In pure mathematics, numbers and operations like addition and multiplication are studied independently of any specific physical context. Mathematicians explore the properties and relationships of numbers within the abstract framework of mathematical structures.

Natural numbers, represented by the set â„• = {1, 2, 3 …}, are a fundamental part of pure mathematics. They serve as the building blocks for other number systems and mathematical structures. Mathematicians study properties of natural numbers, relationships between them, and the structures that can be formed using these numbers.

While natural numbers find applications in various areas of mathematics, their abstract nature allows for broader exploration and understanding beyond specific real-world contexts. This abstraction is a key feature of pure mathematics, where the focus is on the inherent properties and relationships of mathematical objects.

Dynamic Oscillations in a Non-Eventful 0-dimensional Space:

(IV)

The statement articulates a theoretical scenario in a non-eventful, 0-dimensional space, wherein the potential energy of equilibrium points, encompassing both the original point and associated points, emerges from energetic, infinitesimal periodic oscillations along the -x ←pâ‚’₀→ x axis, or -x ←(pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•)→ x axis. This non-eventful, 0-dimensional state denotes an abstract and eventless environment. The potential energy, a collective manifestation from the equilibrium points, signifies stored energy in a system at equilibrium. This energy source originates from dynamic, extremely small periodic oscillations within the ostensibly non-eventful state. The oscillations are directed along the specified axis, either focused on the original point (pâ‚’₀) or extending to associated points (pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•), where â‚“ represents natural numbers. The variable x delineates the magnitude of the infinitesimal energetic or amplitude displacement, playing a pivotal role in comprehending the oscillations' nature. In essence, the refined summary highlights the generation of potential energy through collective, dynamic oscillations within a non-eventful, 0-dimensional space, considering both original and associated equilibrium points along a designated axis.

The description emphasizes how potential energy is generated in a non-eventful, 0-dimensional space through the collective impact of energetic, infinitesimal periodic oscillations along a specified axis, accounting for both the original point and its associated points. The incorporation of associated points introduces the concept of a sequence of equilibrium points.

In a state described as non eventful and 0-dimensional, the potential energy of all equilibrium points (including the original and associated points) arises from energetic, infinitesimal periodic oscillations along the -x ←pâ‚’₀→ x axis or -x ←(pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•)→ x axis. Here, x represents the infinitesimal energetic or amplitude displacement. The statement outlines a theoretical scenario in a non-eventful, 0-dimensional space, where the potential energy of equilibrium points, comprising the original point and its associated points, originates from energetic, infinitesimal periodic oscillations.

Breaking down the components:

Noneventful, 0-dimensional: Describes a state without events or occurrences, existing in a theoretical space with zero spatial dimensions, emphasizing an abstract and non-eventful environment.

Potential energy of all equilibrium points (original and associated): Denotes the stored energy in a system at equilibrium. Both the original and associated points contribute to this potential energy, suggesting a collective influence.

Arises from energetic, infinitesimal periodic oscillations: Indicates that the source of potential energy results from energetic and extremely small periodic oscillations, implying a dynamic quality within a seemingly non-eventful state

Along the -x ←pâ‚’₀→ x axis, or -x ← (pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•) → x axis: Specifies the direction of the oscillations along an axis. The first part designates oscillations cantered around the original point (pâ‚’₀), while the second part allows for the consideration of associated points (pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•), where â‚“ represents natural numbers.

With x representing the infinitesimal energetic or amplitude displacement: Clarifies that the variable x represents the magnitude of the infinitesimal energetic or amplitude displacement, playing a crucial role in understanding the nature of the oscillations.

Infinitesimal Potential Energy in 0-dimension: Math and Time Insights:

(V)

In the theoretical 0-dimensional state, the infinitesimal potential energy (ΔE₀â‚š) of periodic oscillation can be represented as ΔE₀â‚š = k₀(Δx - x₀)². This equation describes how the infinitesimal potential energy (ΔE₀â‚š) changes with a small displacement (Δx) from equilibrium point (x₀) in a 0-dimensional state. The constant k₀ influences the overall behaviour of the potential energy in this theoretical context. The equation does not explicitly include time (t) and the time-varying aspect of potential energy. In a broader context, the complete representation of potential energy U(t) in a 0-dimensional state would follow a time-dependent cosine function: U(t) = U₀ cos(ωt). However, for the specific consideration of infinitesimal potential energy change (ΔE₀â‚š), the time-varying aspect is not explicitly captured in the provided equation. If time dependence is crucial, it can be incorporated in the broader context of potential energy.

Mathematical Representation of Infinitesimal Potential Energy in a 0-Dimensional State:

In the context of the theoretical 0-dimensional state and the infinitesimal potential energy (ΔE₀â‚š) of periodic oscillation, it can be represented as:

ΔE₀â‚š = k₀(Δx - x₀)² 

Here's a comprehensive breakdown of the components:

I. ΔE₀â‚š: Infinitesimal Potential Energy of Periodic Oscillation in the 0-Dimensional State.
This represents the infinitesimal potential energy associated with periodic oscillations in a 0-dimensional state. It signifies a slight change in potential energy resulting from a small displacement from an equilibrium point.

II. k₀: A Constant Related to the 0-Dimensional State, Analogous to the Universal Gravitational Constant (G).
This constant is specific to the 0-dimensional state and determines the strength or stiffness of the potential energy field in this context. It is analogous to constants like the spring constant in Hooke's Law or the Universal Gravitational constant (G) in Newton's law of gravitation.

III. Δx: Represents the Infinitesimal Displacement from the Equilibrium Point.
Denotes the infinitesimal displacement from the equilibrium point, signifying the change in position from the reference point

IV. x₀: The Reference Point around Which the Oscillation Occurs. In This Proposal, x₀ is either pâ‚’₀ or (pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•).
Represents the equilibrium or reference point around which the oscillation occurs. This point is either pâ‚’₀ or (pâ‚“₀, â‚“ ∈ â„•) based on the context.

V. (Δx - x₀)²: Represents the Square of the Difference between the Displacement (Δx) and the Equilibrium Point (x₀).
This term illustrates the square of the difference between the displacement (Δx) and the equilibrium point (x₀), emphasizing the quadratic relationship often observed in systems governed by Hooke's Law or other harmonic oscillation principles.

The equation describes how the infinitesimal potential energy (ΔE₀â‚š) changes with a small displacement (Δx) from equilibrium point (x₀) in a 0-dimensional state. The constant k₀ influences the overall behaviour of potential energy in this theoretical context. 

However, for the specific consideration of infinitesimal potential energy change (ΔE₀â‚š), the time-varying aspect is not explicitly captured in the above equation. If time dependence is crucial, the following equation can be incorporated in the broader context of potential energy.

VI. Time-Varying Aspect: The Equation Does Not Explicitly Include Time (t) and the Time-Varying Aspect of Potential Energy. In a Broader Context, When Considering the Complete Representation of Potential Energy U(t) in a 0-Dimensional State, It Would Follow a Time-Dependent Cosine Function:

U(t) = U₀ cos(ωt)

Here,
U₀ is the amplitude of potential energy,
ω is the angular frequency, and
t is time.

0-Dimensional Exploration: Potential Energy and Oscillations:

(VI)

In a theoretical 0-dimensional state, potential energy points signify theoretical positions in space with associated potential energy. Each point, characterized by potential energy, undergoes a 0-dimensional periodic oscillation. The potential energy at a specific point is described by U(x₀), where x₀ is the point's position. Associated points undergo periodic oscillations around unique equilibrium positions, with their behaviour captured by xáµ¢(t) = xáµ¢₀ + Δxáµ¢ cos(ωᵢt). The infinitesimal potential energy change (ΔE₀â‚šáµ¢) for each point can be expressed as ΔE₀â‚šáµ¢ = k₀áµ¢(Δxáµ¢ - xáµ¢₀)². This framework delves into the behaviour of points, their periodic oscillations, and associated potential energy changes in a 0-dimensional context.

The theoretical exploration of potential energy points and associated oscillations in a 0-dimensional state defines a conceptual framework. Within this system, potential energy points, characterized by U(x), represent theoretical positions with associated potential energy. The expression U(x₀) defines the potential energy at a specific point, emphasizing the dependence on the position (x₀) within this 0-dimensional state.

Further, considering associated points undergoing 0-dimensional periodic oscillations around unique equilibrium positions adds complexity to the system. Each point, denoted as páµ¢, exhibits periodic oscillation described by xáµ¢(t) = xáµ¢₀ + Δxáµ¢ cos(ωᵢt), where xáµ¢₀, Δxáµ¢, and ωᵢ represent the equilibrium position, amplitude of oscillation, and angular frequency, respectively.

The detailed equation for infinitesimal potential energy change ΔE₀â‚šáµ¢ = k₀áµ¢(Δxáµ¢ - xáµ¢₀)² encapsulates the intricate relationship between the displacement (Δxáµ¢) from the equilibrium position and the resulting potential energy change for each specific point. Here, k₀áµ¢ represents a constant unique to the 0-dimensional state for point páµ¢.

In essence, this theoretical framework enriches our understanding of the behaviour of points in a 0-dimensional state, encompassing their periodic oscillations and the consequential changes in potential energy.

Optimal State and Energy Equivalence with Density:

(VII)

The statement delves into the concept of the optimal state, a favourable or advantageous condition relevant to the analysis of energy components. It introduces the Energy Equivalence Principle, asserting that total energy (E₀â‚œ) equals a specific energy component (E₀â‚–), maintaining this equivalence as E₀â‚š diminishes to zero. The exploration of an optimal state, where E₀â‚š decreases, giving rise to the manifestation of E₀â‚–, emphasizes the Energy Equivalence Principle (E₀â‚œ = E₀â‚–) when E₀â‚š = 0.

To quantify energy changes within this optimal state, the statement introduces the concept of energy density (u₀â‚œ). Defined as the integral of the differential change in E₀â‚– with respect to x over the optimal state, energy density serves as a measure of energy per unit volume or space. This comprehensive framework lays the foundation for understanding the transition of one energy component to another, maintaining total energy equivalence under the condition of E₀â‚š becoming zero.

Optimal State and Energy Equivalence:

I. Optimal State: Refers to a state considered favourable or advantageous in some context, associated with the analysis of energy components.

II. Analysis of Optimal State: Investigates the state where E₀â‚š decreases, giving rise to E₀â‚–.

III. Energy Equivalence Principle: Asserts that total energy (E₀â‚œ) equals E₀â‚–, maintained as E₀â‚š becomes zero.

Define Energy Density (u₀â‚œ):

I. Energy Density (u₀â‚œ): A measure of energy per unit volume or space.

II. Integral Definition: Specifies energy density (u₀â‚œ) as the integral of the differential change in E₀â‚– with respect to x over the optimal state.

The statement sets the stage for analysing an optimal state where one energy component diminishes, giving rise to another, and where the total energy is equivalent to a specific energy component, all under the condition that E₀â‚š becomes zero. The concept of energy density is then introduced to quantify energy changes within this optimal state.

Reference: 

A Journey into Existence, Oscillations, and the Vibrational Universe: Unveiling the Origin http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12304.79361

25 January 2024

Clarifying Relativistic Concepts: A Response to Mr. E. P's Inquiry:

Dear Mr. E. P.

I appreciate your engagement with the topic discussed in "A BRIEFER HISTORY OF TIME," and your thoughtful comments have prompted me to provide further clarification.
The 1962 experiment you mentioned, involving precise clocks at different heights, indeed supports the predictions of general relativity. However, it's crucial to acknowledge that similar experiments, while abundant, may have limitations and biases. Specifically, the notion of time dilation must be scrutinized.
Time is not a uniform, dilatable entity but a conceptual framework, as recognized in the principles of special relativity. Please refer to the precise definition of time for a more nuanced understanding.
Clock mechanisms, susceptible to external influences like relativistic effects from speed and gravitational potential differences, add complexity to the interpretation. The scale designed for proper time may not adequately accommodate dilated time, leading to potential discrepancies. Note that the scale of dilated time is distinct from proper time (t' > t), emphasizing that t' is not a simple sum of (t + Δt) but rather an independent quantity.
For additional insights, I recommend reviewing the following research papers:
Concerning your inquiry about the mass relativistic effect, I want to emphasize that it is not mass itself but the effective mass of relativistic energy. This distinction is crucial and is explored in detail in my paper titled "Relativistic Mass versus Effective Mass," where I delve into the energetic nature of relativistic mass and its equivalence to effective mass.
Moreover, please consider the points I made about time delay not being an enlargement or dilation but a change in time, and the relationship between mass and velocity being better understood as the effective mass of relativistic energy.
I also invite you to reassess the paper "Electromagnetism, Relativity and the Basic Unit System Concept" in light of the explanations provided. The paper introduces an alternative approach to the Special Theory of Relativity, considering not only particles in linear motion but also systems in interrelation within the complex plane.
Your thoughtful consideration of these points is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Soumendra Nath Thakur