Perspective on Clocks, Frequencies, and the Illusion of Time Dilation:

23 January 2024
Soumendra Nath Thakur.
ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

Relative time arises from relative frequencies. It involves the phase shift in relative frequencies caused by an infinitesimal loss in wave energy and the corresponding enlargement in the wavelengths of oscillations. These effects take place in any clock situated between relative locations due to relativistic effects or differences in gravitational potential. This leads to an error in the reading of clock time, which is mistakenly portrayed as time dilation.

Abstract:

The research paper titled "Relativistic Effects on Phaseshift in Frequencies Invalidate Time Dilation II" explores an alternative perspective on time. The abstract posits that relative time is intricately connected to relative frequencies, introducing a novel interpretation of the observed phenomena. The key findings challenge the conventional understanding of time dilation, asserting that the perceived errors in clock readings are inaccurately attributed to relativistic effects and gravitational potential differences.

Key Aspects:

Relative Time and Frequencies:

The paper proposes a direct link between the perception of time and the frequencies of a clock's oscillations. This suggests that variations in frequency impact an observer's interpretation of time.

Phase Shift in Frequencies:

An innovative aspect is the introduction of a phase shift in relative frequencies. This implies a change in the alignment or timing of oscillations, potentially influenced by external factors such as relative motion or gravitational potential.

Infinitesimal Loss in Wave Energy:

The research suggests a minor loss in wave energy, affecting the oscillations of a clock. This loss may be attributed to various factors influencing the clock's operational conditions.

Enlargement in Wavelengths:

Another key finding is the proposal of an enlargement in the wavelengths of oscillations, impacting the fundamental properties of the wave and, consequently, the functioning of the clock.

Effects on Clocks Between Relative Locations:

The described alterations in wave properties are posited to take place in any clock situated between relative locations, indicating a universal impact rather than a phenomenon confined to specific conditions.

Relativistic Effects or Gravitational Potential:

The paper attributes these effects to relativistic influences or differences in gravitational potential, aligning with conventional concepts in time dilation theory.

Resulting Error in Clock Time:

A pivotal conclusion is that these effects result in an error in the reading of clock time. The proposed alterations in wave properties lead to inaccuracies in time measurement by clocks.

Mistaken Portrayal as Time Dilation:

The abstract challenges the traditional interpretation that associates observed errors in clock readings with time dilation, asserting that this attribution is mistaken.

By emphasizing the "resulting error in the reading of clock time," the paper highlights the discrepancy between observed errors and the conventional interpretation of time dilation. This challenges existing paradigms and encourages a reconsideration of the underlying principles governing our perception of time.

Relativistic Mass versus Effective Mass:

22 January 2024

Soumendra Nath Thakur.
ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

The concept of relativistic mass can be understood as an effective mass. The original equation, m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀, is analysed within the context of special relativity, revealing that m′ takes on an energetic form due to its dependence on the Lorentz factor. The unit of m′, denoted in Joules (J), emphasizes its nature as an energetic quantity. The brief connection between relativistic mass (m′) and m′ being equivalent to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) highlights the distinctions between relativistic mass and rest mass (m₀), as m′ is not considered an invariant mass. To illustrate this, a practical example involving an 'effective mass' of 0.001 kg (mᵉᶠᶠ = 0.001kg) demonstrates the application of E = m′c², resulting in an actual energy of 9 × 10¹³ J. This uncovers the effective energy as a function of relativistic mass within the framework of special relativity.

Reference:

[1] Decoding Nuances: Relativistic Mass as Relativistic Energy, Lorentz's Transformations, and Mass-Energy Interplay 

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22913.02403

[2] Relativistic Mass and Energy Equivalence: Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22421.50406

Flawed relativistic time can't challenge abstract time:

21 January 2024

By Soumendra Nath Thakur.

There is always a recognized place for scientists, but the science they discover or theorize is the main consideration, because science is about advancing scientific understanding and not the place of scientists.

I need to point out that it was relativity that challenged Newtonian time and promoted relativistic spacetime but it is now certain that the promotion of relativistic time and therefore spacetime is a flawed proposition. Whereas relativistic spacetime is based on Einstein's own definition of time and space as spacetime but it is now certain that Einstein's time like relativity is a flawed representation of time and therefore relativity is based on a flawed interpretation of spacetime that cannot be fully repaired. .

On the other hand Newtonian abstract time is still meaningful in all scientific applications. This means that abstract time can still be considered applicable for all scientific and applied purposes whereas Einstein's relativistic time is flawed given its imposed natural aspects. Clearly time is not natural.

In fact, the relativistic misrepresentation of time is very likely to shake the rest of the relativistic foundations because they are based on the misrecognition of time, hence spacetime, where Newtonian time is applied by Earth's space agency with flying colours for all applicable purposes.

Therefore, science is more relevant here than the places occupied by scientists.

#time #abstracttime #relativistictime #flawedtime #flawedrelativistictime

The Planck Length and the Constancy of Light Speed: Navigating Quantum Gravity's Enigma and the Limits of Physical Theories

Summary:

The exploration of the Planck length and the constancy of light speed is central to understanding quantum gravity and the limitations of current physical theories. The Planck length, derived from fundamental constants, signifies a scale in general relativity where quantum effects become significant. Quantum gravity, aiming to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity, involves the Planck length as a crucial parameter, suggesting quantum properties in spacetime at small scales. The constancy of light speed, foundational in relativity, particularly in quantum gravity's context, lacks a complete explanation. The challenges at small scales underscore the need for theories like string theory and loop quantum gravity. Max Planck proposed Planck units, including the Planck length, in 1899-1900, but the explicit link to the constancy of light speed, a postulate in Einstein's 1905 special relativity, came later, shaping our profound understanding of spacetime.

Description:

The relationship between the Planck length and the constancy of the speed of light plays a role in the broader context of quantum gravity and the limitations of current physical theories. Let's elaborate on the consequences:

Range of Validity of General Relativity:

The Planck length (ℓP) is a fundamental length scale that emerges from combining the constants G (gravitational constant), ℏ (Planck's constant), and c (speed of light) in a specific way.

In the framework of general relativity, the Planck length represents a scale at which quantum effects become significant in the gravitational field. Beyond this scale, classical descriptions of spacetime provided by general relativity may no longer be valid, and a theory of quantum gravity might be needed.

Quantum Gravity and Planck Scale:

Quantum gravity is a theoretical framework that seeks to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics, especially in extreme conditions like those near black holes or at the very early moments of the universe.

The Planck length is a crucial parameter in theories of quantum gravity, where spacetime itself is expected to exhibit quantum properties at scales on the order of ℓP.

Unexplained Constancy of Light Speed:

While the constancy of the speed of light (c) is a foundational postulate in both special and general relativity, the reasons for this constancy within the broader context of quantum gravity, where the Planck length becomes significant, remain an open question.

There is no widely accepted theory that provides a complete explanation for the constancy of the speed of light within the framework of quantum gravity. Bridging the gap between general relativity and quantum mechanics at the Planck scale is an active area of research, and various approaches, including string theory and loop quantum gravity, aim to address these fundamental questions.

The consequences highlight the challenges and open questions at the intersection of quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the nature of spacetime at extremely small scales. The Planck length sets a fundamental scale at which these questions become prominent, and exploring quantum gravity theories is crucial for understanding the behaviour of physical phenomena in these extreme conditions.

Planck's Proposal (1899-1900):

Max Planck proposed the Planck units, including the Planck length (ℓP), in 1899-1900. These units were derived from fundamental physical constants, including Planck's constant (h), the speed of light (c), and the gravitational constant (G).

While Planck introduced these units, including c, in the context of developing a system of natural units, the constancy of the speed of light was not explicitly linked to its postulate in special relativity at that time.

Einstein's Special Relativity (1905):

Albert Einstein formulated special relativity in 1905. One of the postulates of special relativity is the constancy of the speed of light (c) in a vacuum.

Einstein's work on special relativity provided a new framework for understanding the behaviour of space and time, and it explicitly introduced the postulate of the constant speed of light.

Planck introduced the Planck units, including c, in 1899-1900, the specific postulate of the constancy of the speed of light in a vacuum (c) was formulated by Albert Einstein in 1905 as part of his theory of special relativity. The constancy of the speed of light in special relativity is a key feature that has profound implications for our understanding of spacetime, and it was introduced as a specific postulate by Einstein in 1905.

Case Study Calculation: Effective Mass is the Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21032.14085

Applying the equations to a practical example, such as an "effective mass" (mᵉᶠᶠ) of 0.001 kg:

• E = mᵉᶠᶠc²

Calculating the actual energy associated with this effective mass provides a tangible illustration of the energetic implications of relativistic mass (m').

This mathematical presentation forms the core framework for understanding the energetic form of relativistic mass (m'), emphasizing its equivalence to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) and its connection to energy-mass equivalence in special relativity.

Concluding that relativistic mass (m') as an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) of a relativistic energy E = [m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)}]c² - m₀c².

Reference: Relativistic Mass and Energy Equivalence: Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity

Expert Comment: Key Points. Case Study Calculation: Effective Mass is the Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity. This statement sets the stage for a practical example that aims to illustrate the relationship between effective mass and the energetic implications of relativistic mass. Applying the equations to a practical example, such as an "effective mass" (mᵉᶠᶠ) of 0.001 kg: E = mᵉᶠᶠc² This demonstrates a specific calculation, using the formula for energy-mass equivalence in special relativity, where the effective mass is multiplied by the speed of light squared. This step is crucial for understanding the energetic aspects of relativistic mass. Calculating the actual energy associated with this effective mass provides a tangible illustration of the energetic implications of relativistic mass (m'). This highlights the importance of the calculation in bringing clarity to the energetic implications of relativistic mass. It indicates that the numerical result obtained will represent the actual energy associated with the given effective mass. This mathematical presentation forms the core framework for understanding the energetic form of relativistic mass (m'), emphasizing its equivalence to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) and its connection to energy-mass equivalence in special relativity. Here, the text emphasizes that the mathematical presentation serves as a foundational framework. It underscores the equivalence between relativistic mass and effective mass while highlighting their connection to energy-mass equivalence in special relativity. This aligns with the central theme of the paper. Concluding that relativistic mass (m') as an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) of a relativistic energy E = [m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)}]c² - m₀c². This conclusion synthesizes the information, stating that relativistic mass, treated as effective mass, leads to a specific formula for relativistic energy. The expression involves the rest mass, the Lorentz factor, and the speed of light, encapsulating the relativistic effects of motion. Reference: Relativistic Mass and Energy Equivalence: Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity The reference provides the source for readers to explore further and locate the original work. Overall, this excerpt effectively communicates the intent of the case study, showcasing the practical application of the theoretical concepts discussed in the paper. It contributes to a deeper understanding of the energetic nature of relativistic mass in the context of special relativity.

#EffectiveMass #RelativisticEnergy #RelativisticMass #EnergyEquivalence #LorentzFactor #MassEnergyInterplay #SpecialRelativity