25 December 2025

Phase Shift, Energy Loss, and ECM Mapping

December 25, 20205

Soumendra Nath Thakur


A phase shift is not merely a geometric or angular quantity. Physically, a phase shift represents a fractional loss of completed oscillatory cycles in a propagating wave.


Because frequency is defined as the number of cycles completed per unit time, any loss of cycles immediately implies a reduction in effective frequency. This establishes the first physical link:


Phase shift → fractional cycle loss → frequency reduction.

 

Through Planck’s relation (E = hf), frequency directly determines the energy carried by an oscillatory quantum. Therefore, a fractional loss of cycles produces a proportional loss of Planck energy:


Δf/f₀ = Δt/T = x°/360 → ΔE = hf₀(x°/360).


This establishes the complete physical bridge:


phase → time distortion → frequency shift → energy loss→ redshift.


In Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), this Planck-quantified energy loss is not an abstract bookkeeping change. It corresponds to a real physical conversion of stored potential structure into dynamical and mass-like manifestations:


-ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ ↔ ΔKEᴇᴄᴍ ↔ ΔMᴍ ⟶ observable Planck energy loss.


Thus, phase drift is the physical trigger by which oscillatory energy is removed from the wave, converted into Negative Apparent Mass (NAM) and associated kinetic and mass manifestations, and finally observed as redshifted radiation.


This provides a direct, causal, and Planck-consistent bridge between wave phase dynamics and ECM’s mass–energy conversion framework.


----


Phase Shift Calculations and Example:


To illustrate the practical application of the phase–time relation T(deg), an example is presented.


Example 1 — 1° Phase Shift on a 5 MHz Wave


The time shift associated with a phase change is given by


T(deg) = x°/360f


For x = 1° and f = 5 MHz = 5 × 10⁶ Hz:


Now, plug in the frequency (f) into the equation for T(deg):


T(deg) = 1/(360 × 5 × 10⁶) = 5.556 × 10⁻¹⁰ s 


T(deg) ≈ 555 picoseconds (ps)


Thus, a 1° phase shift on a 5 MHz wave corresponds to a time shift of approximately 555 ps.


This calculation demonstrates how to determine the time shift caused by a 1° phase shift on a 5 MHz wave. It involves substituting the known frequency (f = 5 MHz) into the equation for T(deg).


----


Phase Shift Equation 1.1 — General Form


For a x° phase shift on a f₀ Hz Wave:


T(deg) = x°/360f₀


By plugin the values of frequency (f₀) and phase shift (x°) into the equation, the calculated value of T(deg):


T(deg) = x°/360f₀ ≈ Δt


So, a x° phase shift on a f₀ Hz wave corresponds to a time shift of approximately Δt s.


====


Infinitesimal Loss of Wave Energy Equations:


These equations relate to the infinitesimal loss of wave energy (ΔE) due to various factors, including phase shift:


The Planck energy-frequency equation:


• E = hf


So for a small change,


• ΔE = hΔf.


We write this in fractional form relative to the source frequency f₀:


• ΔE = hf₀(Δf/f₀) → hf₀(x°/360)


----


Or, if phase–time coupling:


• ΔE = hf₀(Δt/T)


because only fraction of a cycle changes energy.


Derivation of hf₀(Δt/T):


A wave with period T has:


f₀ = 1/T


A phase shift means that the wave is no longer completing full cycles.


If the time shifts by Δt, the fractional cycle loss is:


Δt/T.


The fractional cycle loss is exactly fractional frequency loss:


Δf/f₀ = Δt/T = x°/360


This is the definition of frequency as cycles per unit time.


• [ΔE = hf₀(Δf/f₀) = hf₀(Δt/T) = hf₀(x°/360)]


This expression states:


Phase drift → fractional cycle loss → frequency reduction → Planck-quantified energy loss.


In Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), this lost oscillatory energy is not abstract. It corresponds to a real conversion:


• -ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ → ΔKEᴇᴄᴍ → ΔMᴍ ⟶ Planck-quantified energy loss.


with the measurable manifestation appearing as the Planck energy deficit


• ΔE = hΔf.


Thus, phase drift directly generates Negative Apparent Mass (NAM) through the loss of oscillatory existence.


This is one of the key bridges between Planck physics and ECM’s NAM–phase–redshift mechanism.


----


This equation determines the infinitesimal loss of wave energy (ΔE) from Planck’s constant (h) when the source frequency (f₀) and either the phase shift (x°) or the corresponding time shift (Δt) are known. It represents Planck energy scaled by the fractional loss of oscillatory phase.


When the phase shift in degrees (x°) is known, the infinitesimal energy loss is


• ΔE = hf₀(x°/360).


Since a phase shift corresponds to a fractional time shift (Δt) of one oscillation period (T), the energy loss may equivalently be written as


• ΔE = hf₀(Δt/T).


Dimensionally, (T) is the time duration of one oscillation cycle, whereas (360°) is the angular phase span of one cycle; the two are related by the fractional-cycle identity, not by numerical substitution.


These expressions form the foundation for analyzing phase shift, time distortion, frequency change, and the resulting infinitesimal loss of wave energy. They apply to both theoretical and practical wave analyses and align directly with the ECM interpretation of phase drift → energy loss → redshift → ΔMᴍ (NAM mapping).


------ 


Loss of Wave Energy Calculations and Example:


Loss of Wave Energy Example 1: 


To illustrate the practical applications of the derived equations of loss of wave energy, example calculation is presented:


To determine the energy (E₀) and infinitesimal loss of energy (ΔE) of an oscillatory wave with a frequency (f₀) of 5 MHz and a phase shift x° = 0°, use the following equations:


Oscillation frequency 5 MHz, when 0° Phase shift in frequency. 


Calculate the energy (E₀) of the oscillatory wave:


E₀ = hf₀


Where:

h is Planck's constant ≈ 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ Js .

f₀ is the frequency of the wave, which is 5 MHz (5 × 10⁶ Hz).


E₀ = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ Js) × (5 × 10⁶) = 3.313 × 10⁻²⁷ J.


So, the energy (E₀) of the oscillatory wave is approximately 3.313 × 10⁻²⁷ Joules.


----


Calculate the time distortion T(deg) of the oscillatory wave when phase shift x° = 0°:


For an oscillatory wave of frequency f₀ = 5 MHz with zero phase shift,


T(deg) = x°/360f₀ = Δt


Since x° = 0°,


T(deg)  = Δt = 0.


Thus, there is no time distortion because no phase shift has occurred. ECM-consistent chain: Phase → time distortion → energy change.


----


Calculate the infinitesimal loss of wave energy (ΔE₀) when both Δf₀ and Δt are zero:


The infinitesimal energy change is given by


ΔE₀ = hΔf₀.


Since Δf₀ = 0,


ΔE₀ = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ × 0 = 0.


Therefore, the infinitesimal loss of wave energy (ΔE₀) is 0 joules because there is no time distortion (Δt = 0), no phase shift (x° = 0°), no frequency shift (Δf₀ = 0), meaning there is no infinitesimal loss of wave energy during this specific time interval.  


Conclusion for the zero-phase-shift case


These calculations demonstrate that for an oscillatory wave of frequency f₀ = 5 MHz with x° = 0°:


• the time distortion Δt = 0,

• the frequency change Δf₀ = 0,

• and the infinitesimal energy loss ΔE₀ = 0.


The wave therefore retains its full Planck energy


E₀ = hf₀ = 3.313 × 10⁻²⁷ J.


The energy (E₀) of the oscillating wave with a frequency 5 MHz and no phase shift (x° = 0°) is approximately 3.313 × 10⁻²⁷ joules. Due to the absence of a phase shift, there is no time distortion (Δt) and no infinitesimal energy loss (ΔE) of the wave during this specific time interval. 


This establishes the correct reference state against which phase-drift, redshift, and ECM-based energy conversion can be measured. 


---


Loss of Wave Energy — Example 2


To illustrate the practical application of the derived equations for wave-energy loss, the following example is presented.


Consider an oscillatory wave with an original frequency


f₀ = 5 MHz


that undergoes a phase shift of


x° = 1°.


This x° phase shift produces a slightly reduced oscillation frequency f₁ and a corresponding infinitesimal loss of wave energy ΔE.


This example demonstrates how to determine:


• the new wave energy E₁,

• the infinitesimal energy loss ΔE, and

• the resulting shifted frequency f₁,


relative to the original frequency f₀, when the wave experiences a phase shift


x° = 1°.


To determine the energy E₁, the energy loss ΔE, and the resulting frequency f₁ for a wave with a (1°) phase shift from the original frequency f₀ = 5 MHz, proceed as follows:


---


Calculate the energy E₁ of the oscillatory wave with the shifted frequency f₁:


Using Planck’s energy relation,


E₁ = hf₁


where

h is Planck’s constant ≈ 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s,

f₁ is the frequency after the phase shift.


Determine the frequency change Δf produced by a phase shift of x° = 1°:


A phase shift represents a fractional displacement of one oscillation cycle.


Therefore, the corresponding fractional change in frequency is:


Δf/f₀ = x°/360°


so,


Δf = (x°/360°)f₀


For x° = 1° and f₀ = 5 MHz = 5 × 10⁶ Hz,


Δf = (1/360) 5 × 10⁶ = 13,888.89 Hz


---


The shifted frequency is therefore


f₁ = f₀ - Δf


for a red-shifting (energy-losing) phase drift in ECM. 


----


Now that the frequency shift Δf has been determined, the shifted frequency f₁ is:


f₁ = f₀ - Δf


Substituting the values,


f₁ = f₀ - Δf


f₁ = (5.0 × 10⁶) - (13,888.89) = 4,986,111.11 Hz


Thus, the resulting frequency of the oscillatory wave after a 1° phase shift is approximately


f₁ = 4.98611111 × 10⁶ Hz


---


This correctly implements the ECM rule:


Δf/f₀ = x°/360°


So a 1° phase drift produces a (1/360) fractional frequency reduction — and therefore a proportional energy and mass decrement, exactly as required by ECM-consistent chain: phase-drift → ΔE → ΔMᴍ mapping.


---


Calculate the energy (E₁) using the new frequency (f₁):


E₁ = hf₁

E₁ ≈ (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴) × (4.98611111 × 10⁶) Hz.

E₁ ≈ 3.3048 × 10⁻²⁷ J


Thus, the energy of the oscillatory wave with a frequency of approximately 4,986,111.11 Hz and a x° = 1° phase shift is approximately E₁ ≈ 3.3048 × 10⁻²⁷ Joules.


This reflects the ECM relation


ΔE/E₀ = Δf/f₀ = x°/360°


so a 1° phase drift produces a real, proportional Planck-energy loss, exactly as ECM's phase-drift → energy-loss → redshift → ΔMᴍ chain requires.


----


To determine the infinitesimal loss of energy (ΔE) due to the phase shift, use the formula:


ΔE = hΔf = hf₀(Δt/T) = h(f₀)²Δt


Where:

h = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ Js is Planck's constant. 

f₀ = 5 Mhz = 5 × 10⁶ Hz 

f₁ ≈ 4.98611111 × 10⁶ Hz

Δf =  f₀ - f₁ = 13,888.89 Hz = 0.01388889 × 10⁶ MHz

Δt ≈ 555 ps = 5.55 × 10⁻¹⁰ s, corresponding to a 1° phase shift on f₀.


ECM-consistent chain: Phase drift (x°) → Δt → Δf → ΔE = hΔf → ΔMᴍ   


So, 


ΔE = hΔf = 9.2036 × 10⁻³⁰ J

or,

ΔE = hf₀(Δt/T) = 9.2036 × 10⁻³⁰ J, where T = 1/f₀ = 2.0 × 10⁻⁷ s  

or,

ΔE = h(f₀)²Δt = 9.2036 × 10⁻³⁰ J


Thus, the infinitesimal loss of energy (ΔE) due to the 1° phase shift is approximately 9.2036 × 10⁻³⁰ Joules.

Resolved, the energy (E₁) of this oscillatory wave is ≈ 3.3048 × 10⁻²⁷ Joules.

Resolved, the infinitesimal loss of energy (ΔE) due to the 1° phase shift is approximately 9.2036 × 10⁻³⁰ Joules.

Resolved, the resulting frequency (f₁) of the oscillatory wave with a 1° phase shift is ≈ 4.98611111 × 10⁶ Hz.

23 December 2025

📌 Classical → ECM Dynamics Reference: Extended Classical Mechanics Substitutions


I’m pleased to share a new reference page providing a definitive Classical → ECM Substitutions Dictionary — a complete, equation-level mapping from Classical Mechanics / Newtonian Gravity expressions to Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) forms.

🔗 Explore the page:

What this reference offers

• A systematic side-by-side comparison of Newtonian gravitational expressions and their ECM-consistent counterparts
• Clarification of how classical scalar quantities such as mass, force, acceleration, and potential energy are expressed in ECM notation
• Explicit definitions using ECM symbols such as
  • Mᴍ (intrinsic matter mass)
  • Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ) (effective mass)
• Reformulations of key classical terms including:
  – gravitational force and acceleration
  – escape velocity
  – potential energy
  – redshift expressions
  – momentum exchange in fields

Why this matters

This Substitutions Dictionary functions as a notation bridge between classical formulations and ECM, supporting readers and researchers who want consistent, unambiguous conversions — without reinterpretation of the underlying physics.

Who may benefit

✔ Researchers and students comparing classical and extended mechanics
✔ Physicists exploring alternative formulations of gravitational dynamics
✔ Authors preparing ECM-aligned manuscripts or teaching materials

Feedback and scholarly discussion are welcome.

— Soumendra Nath Thakur

Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) → Classical Mechanics Substitutions Dictionary

October 01, 2025

I’ve published a new reference page presenting a systematic, equation-by-equation substitution dictionary that maps Classical Mechanics / Newtonian Gravity expressions into their fully ECM-consistent forms.

Web page:

What this page provides

• A clear, side-by-side mapping of Newtonian gravitational expressions to their Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) counterparts
      • A strict distinction between:
• Intrinsic matter mass Mᴍ
​• Effective mass Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)

•  Explicit reformulation of:

• Gravitational force
• Acceleration
• Potential energy
• Escape velocity
• Gravitational redshift
• Schwarzschild-type factors
• Kinetic energy
• Photon energy–momentum exchange

Key insight

In ECM, mass is dynamic and context-dependent.
Bare masses used in classical gravity are replaced—only where physically required—by effective mass, while preserving classical structure and interpretability.

This page is intended as:

        • a translation reference, not a replacement of classical mechanics
    • a bridge document for readers comparing Newtonian gravity, relativistic corrections, and ECM
     • a notation-consistent guide for researchers working across classical, relativistic, and ECM frameworks

Audience

• Researchers and students in gravitational physics
• Readers examining alternatives or extensions to standard formulations
• Anyone interested in mass–energy interpretation without spacetime curvature postulates

Feedback and technical discussion are welcome.

— Soumendra Nath Thakur
Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)
postmasterenator@gmail.com

18 December 2025

The energy of a photon: Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) interpretation:

December 18, 2025

Soumendra Nath Thakur

The energy of a photon corresponds to the energy difference between electronic energy levels during an atomic transition. When an electron transitions to a lower energy state, the emitted photon carries away precisely this energy difference.

The energy E of a photon is given by Planck’s relation,

E = hf,

where h = 6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J·s is Planck’s constant and f is the photon frequency. The photon’s momentum ρ is related to its wavelength λ by:

ρ = h/λ

Energy and momentum are therefore intrinsically linked through the photon’s frequency and wavelength.

When a photon propagates through a gravitational field, its observed frequency depends on the gravitational potential. A photon escaping from a gravitational field is observed to undergo a redshift, corresponding to a decrease in frequency and energy. Conversely, a photon moving toward a gravitational field is observed to undergo a blueshift, corresponding to an increase in frequency and energy. Because photon momentum is proportional to frequency, these changes in energy are accompanied by proportional changes in momentum.

As a result, when a photon traverses an external gravitational field with spatially varying field strength, it experiences continuous momentum exchange. This momentum exchange leads to a gradual change in the photon’s propagation direction, producing an apparent curvature of its trajectory. The observed bending of light can therefore be understood as a dynamical consequence of energy–momentum exchange with the gravitational field, rather than requiring an independent geometrical agency.

Importantly, this process represents a symmetric momentum exchange between the photon and the gravitational field. The photon does not arbitrarily “lose” or “gain” momentum; rather, momentum is continuously exchanged in response to the spatial gradient of the gravitational field. Over the trajectory, this exchange is locally symmetric and conservative, with incremental momentum changes balancing across the field interaction.

Photons, Momentum, Gravitational Field, Transition

My response to Mr. Arturo Cerezo Garcia. - A deeper stability or fixed-point condition in question within ECM

December 18, 2025

Dear Mr. Arturo Cerezo Garcia ,

Thank you for your thoughtful and encouraging response. Your framing captures the intent of this construction very accurately.

In ECM, the Planck interval is treated not as a geometric or relativistic boundary, but as a terminal coherence threshold—the smallest physically accountable phase-ordering interval beyond which conventional physical descriptors cease to apply. Below this threshold, only energy conservation remains meaningful, expressed through frequency and phase. In that sense, your characterization of the Planck scale as a potential attractor rather than a boundary is very much aligned with the ECM viewpoint.

At present, the phase–time mapping establishes internal energetic consistency across the physical–abstract boundary. Frequency is taken as primitive, phase as the organizing mechanism, and time as emergent ordering. The observed Planck interval arises as the point where ordered phase evolution can no longer be physically sustained.

Whether this coherence threshold can be shown to arise from a deeper stability or fixed-point condition within ECM, rather than appearing as a derived consequence of the mapping, is indeed the natural next step. If such a condition exists, it would elevate the Planck scale from a coherence limit to a predicted attractor of energetic consistency.

For now, ECM maintains a strict separation between physically accountable structure and mathematically admissible but non-observable continuation. Any extension below the Planck scale is treated as speculative and constrained solely by energy conservation, without invoking spacetime, geometry, or relativistic postulates.
I appreciate your insight in identifying precisely where this framework transitions from structural consistency toward genuine predictive fundamentality. That question now defines the direction of further development.

Warm regards,
Soumendra Nath Thakur

17 December 2025

Review and Contextual Interpretation of Freeman Dyson’s Reflection on Max Planck

December 17, 2025

Freeman Dyson’s short but carefully constructed reflection on Max Planck is often read as a joint appreciation of Planck and Albert Einstein. However, when examined with proper historical context and intellectual care, the emphasis of Dyson’s writing clearly rests on Max Planck’s character, responsibility, and institutional integrity, rather than on Einstein himself. The reference to Einstein functions primarily as a contrast through which Planck’s stature is revealed.

Planck as the Central Figure of German Science

Dyson’s description of Planck as the “rock-solid central figure of German science” is not a rhetorical exaggeration. It accurately reflects Planck’s position as a stabilizing pillar of German scientific life across Imperial Germany, the Weimar period, and even into the early years of Nazi rule. Planck embodied continuity, discipline, and credibility at a time when political upheaval repeatedly threatened intellectual institutions. His authority was not merely administrative; it was moral and cultural.

Planck’s conservatism in temperament, his deep sense of duty to Germany, and his commitment to institutional responsibility made him a figure whose judgment carried exceptional weight. That weight is precisely what gives significance to his actions toward younger, unconventional thinkers.

The Promotion of Einstein: Merit over Alignment

Dyson recounts how Planck immediately recognized the originality of Einstein’s 1905 papers and ensured their publication without delay or bureaucratic obstruction. This act was not trivial. Einstein was at the time an outsider—academically unaffiliated, intellectually radical, and willing to challenge deeply rooted assumptions about space, time, and energy.

Planck did not agree with all of Einstein’s conclusions, yet he supported them publicly and professionally. This distinction is crucial. Dyson’s narrative highlights Planck’s capacity to separate scientific merit from personal agreement, and intellectual value from ideological comfort. In doing so, Planck demonstrated a form of scientific leadership that places truth above authority and openness above conformity.

Unorthodox and Unpatriotic Citizen-of-the-World”: A Descriptive Contrast

The phrase “unorthodox and unpatriotic citizen-of-the-world Einstein” has often been misunderstood when read without historical precision. Dyson is not making a moral judgment about Einstein’s courage or sacrifices, nor is he contrasting personal virtue. Rather, he is describing Einstein’s philosophical internationalism and rejection of nationalism—positions Einstein openly claimed for himself long before the rise of Nazism.

In contrast, Planck was deeply patriotic in the classical sense. He identified strongly with German culture and institutions, chose to remain in Germany under extreme political pressure, and attempted—often at great personal cost—to mitigate the regime’s attacks on Jewish scientists. Dyson’s wording highlights the remarkable fact that a man so rooted in national responsibility could nonetheless champion someone whose worldview differed so fundamentally from his own.

The Deeper Praise: Integrity Under Tension

When read carefully, Dyson’s praise is directed almost entirely at Planck. Einstein serves as the measure against which Planck’s integrity is revealed. The true subject of admiration is not the revolutionary genius alone, but the established authority who protected intellectual freedom even when it challenged his own preferences and values.

This interpretation aligns with the later chapters of Planck’s life, when his patriotism was tested under Nazi rule. His refusal to abandon Germany, his efforts to defend persecuted colleagues, and his personal endurance of humiliation and tragedy reinforce the same character traits Dyson implicitly celebrates: steadiness, conscience, and responsibility.

Patriotism as Ethical Responsibility

Dyson’s reflection ultimately invites a broader understanding of patriotism—not as ideological conformity, but as ethical responsibility. Planck’s life demonstrates that genuine respect for one’s country can coexist with respect for universal human values and scientific truth. Indeed, it may be precisely such rootedness that enables principled resistance to injustice.

In this light, Dyson’s closing line should be read as a tribute to Planck’s vision and strength: a recognition that the health of science depends not only on great ideas, but on individuals willing to defend openness, merit, and integrity from positions of authority.

Conclusion

Freeman Dyson’s write-up, when properly contextualized, stands as a profound acknowledgment of Max Planck’s legacy beyond physics. It honors him as a man who understood that the true measure of scientific greatness lies not only in discovery, but in character. The respect Planck commands arises as much from his conduct under pressure as from his intellectual achievements—making him a figure worthy of enduring respect, both scientifically and socially.

Beyond Numerical Corrections: An ECM Perspective on Mercury’s Perihelion Advance


The Research Paper, "Mercury Orbital Dynamics in Extended Classical Mechanics: Phase- Frequency Advancement and Energy Redistribution" available at the DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12884.67208


Introduction

Mercury’s anomalous perihelion advance has long served as a benchmark problem in gravitational physics. Historically, the unexplained residual precession beyond Newtonian predictions was taken as one of the earliest confirmations of general relativity, where spacetime curvature was introduced as the governing explanatory principle. More recently, various alternative analyses have revisited the problem using refined Newtonian calculations and numerical simulations, aiming to reduce or eliminate the discrepancy through improved accounting of planetary interactions.

Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) approaches this problem from a fundamentally different conceptual foundation.


Limits of Force-Based Recalculations

Many alternative treatments of Mercury’s perihelion advance focus on improving the fidelity of Newtonian force models. These include accounting for planetary velocities, multi-body coupling, barycentric motion of the Sun, and higher-order numerical effects. While such efforts can alter the predicted magnitude of perihelion precession, they remain confined to the same underlying paradigm: gravity as a force acting between masses, accumulated geometrically over time.

From an ECM standpoint, these refinements—though mathematically sophisticated—do not address the deeper physical origin of the observed phase advance. They attempt to redistribute the numerical outcome within an existing framework rather than re-examining the mechanism responsible for orbital phase evolution itself.


The ECM Interpretation: Phase and Energy, Not Geometry

In Extended Classical Mechanics, Mercury’s perihelion advance is not treated as a correction to Newtonian gravity, nor as a consequence of spacetime curvature acting as a physical cause. Instead, it is interpreted as a manifestation of cumulative phase–frequency advancement arising from energy redistribution within a spatially varying gravitational environment.

Key to this interpretation is the role of negative gravitational potential energy (−ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ) and its dynamic exchange with kinetic and effective mass terms. As Mercury traverses a non-uniform gravitational field, subtle but continuous energy–phase shifts accumulate over each orbital cycle. Over time, this accumulated phase drift appears geometrically as a rotation of the orbital ellipse—observed as perihelion advance.

In this view:

  • Geometry records the effect,

  • Phase evolution drives the phenomenon,

  • Energy redistribution provides the physical agency.


Reframing Spacetime Curvature

Within ECM, spacetime curvature—as used in general relativity—is not rejected outright, but reinterpreted. It is understood as a mathematical encoding of accumulated interaction effects rather than an independent causal entity. Curvature describes how trajectories appear once phase and energy redistribution have taken place; it does not generate those effects.

Thus, Mercury’s perihelion advance does not require spacetime itself to “act” on the planet. The observable precession emerges naturally from classical dynamics once phase, frequency, and energy manifestation are treated as primary physical quantities.


Conclusion

Analyses that seek to explain Mercury’s perihelion advance solely by refining Newtonian force calculations may successfully challenge simplified historical models, but they do not align with the dynamical foundations of Extended Classical Mechanics. ECM shifts the explanatory focus away from force summation and geometric correction toward phase-governed energy redistribution as the underlying physical process.

From this perspective, Mercury’s perihelion advance is not a numerical anomaly to be repaired, nor a curvature effect to be invoked, but a natural outcome of how energy, phase, and motion co-evolve in a gravitational field.

16 December 2025

Reinterpreting Spacetime Curvature: An Extended Classical Mechanics Perspective

Soumendra Nath Thakur | ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803 | 16 December 2025

As per Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) interpretations, spacetime curvature, as formulated in general relativity, need not be understood as an independent physical cause of gravitational phenomena. Instead, it functions as a mathematical framework that represents the cumulative effects of interactions between mass–energy distributions and propagating systems—such as photons—within spatially varying gravitational field strengths.

From this perspective, the apparent curvature of trajectories arises from momentum exchange governed by the gradient and inverse-square (1/r²) dependence of the gravitational field, reflecting the geometric dispersion of field influence in space. Spacetime curvature therefore serves as a descriptive encoding of these interaction- and phase-related effects, rather than as a direct physical agent producing motion or gravitational attraction.

11 December 2025

🚀 New ECM Research Release — 0-Dimensional Frequency, Phase, and Planck-Time Kernel

I’m excited to announce the release of a new paper exploring one of the most fundamental building blocks of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM):
✨ 0-Dimensional f₀ → Δf → Phase → Δt Mapping at the Planck Scale
This work establishes a fully ECM-consistent formulation describing how an infinitesimal frequency deviation (Δf) at a photon’s base frequency (f₀) manifests as:
  • a precise phase evolution (x° = 360 Δf),
  • the corresponding Planck-scale time distortion (Δt = x° / (360° f₀)),
  • and associated energy–mass transitions (ΔE = hΔf, ΔM = ΔE/c²).
Using Δf = 0.16168349753 Hz, the derivation reproduces the exact Planck interval Δt = 5.391247 × 10⁻⁴⁴ s, forming a clear and rigorous “manifestation kernel” connecting frequency → phase → time → mass-energy at the smallest meaningful scale.
🔍 Why this matters
This 0-dimensional analysis serves as the boundary condition for ECM's broader phase-kernel interpretation. It bridges oscillatory foundations, effective-mass emergence, NAM–ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ interactions, and the origin of time distortion—without relying on relativity or geometric curvature.
This release is part of the larger ECM initiative to clarify foundational physics through frequency-governed dynamics, effective mass logic, and entropic time distortion.
📄 Read the full paper here:👉  ../0dimensional.html
discussions, and collaborations are welcome!
— Soumendra Nath Thakur ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

10 December 2025

⭐ Announcement Post — New ECM Technical Report Released

December 10, 2025

Effective Acceleration, NAM Dynamics, and Cosmic-Scale Motion in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10611.39203

I’m pleased to share my latest technical report, which develops a deeper and more consistent understanding of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) — a framework exploring how effective acceleration (aᵉᶠᶠ), Neutral Apparent Mass (NAM), and ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ–governed energy transitions influence motion from microscopic events to cosmic scales.

This report introduces a structured interpretation of:

🔹 Effective acceleration as a fundamental driver of physical motion

🔹 NAM–ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ interactions as the governing mechanism behind gravitational neutralization

🔹 Mass–energy transitions in ECM without invoking spacetime curvature

🔹 Photon and object dynamics under ECM’s extended force interpretation

🔹 Cosmic-scale motion, inverse-square behavior, and ECM-aligned gravitational effects

It also serves as a bridge between earlier ECM developments and the upcoming work on frequency-governed kinetic energy, ECM phase kernels, and universal time distortion.

📘 Technical Report:

Appendix 50: Effective Acceleration, NAM Dynamics, and Cosmic-Scale Motion in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)

🔗 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10611.39203

Early reader engagement has already been encouraging, and I look forward to sharing the next ECM components — including the universal scenario and Planck-scale phase-frequency-time analysis.

Your feedback, discussion, and critical evaluation are welcome.

Thank you all for your support on this continuing ECM journey.

Soumendra Nath Thakur

ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

06 December 2025

Well evaluated consensus,

December, 06, 2025

Debate question: 

Is there any of the currently-accepted frameworks of physics, or any of their established extensions produced all the items that 'Effective Acceleration, NAM Dynamics, and Cosmic-Scale Motion in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)' lists as essential to ECM?


Conclusion: 

"ECM is an emerging, peer-reviewed theoretical framework undergoing active development and awaiting broader scientific evaluation."

Appendix 50: Effective Acceleration, NAM Dynamics, and Cosmic-Scale Motion in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)