The Relationship Between Events and the Emergence of Time in Classical and Relativistic Frameworks of Space and Time: Events Invoke Time

Soumendra Nath Thakur

ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

10-08-2024

An event (P) can be represented within a coordinate system (x, y, z, t) in both Classical Euclidean space-time and Relativistic Minkowskian spacetime, albeit with different interpretations.

Classical Euclidean Space and Time:

In Classical Euclidean interpretations, events are described using three spatial coordinates (x, y, z) along with an absolute, independent time dimension (t). Here, space and time are treated as separate entities, with time progressing uniformly and unaffected by spatial coordinates.

Relativistic Minkowskian Spacetime:

Conversely, in Relativistic Minkowskian interpretations, events are represented within the same three spatial coordinates (x, y, z) but are fused with the time coordinate (t) into a unified spacetime framework. This framework is expressed as (t, x, y, z), where time and space are interwoven, reflecting the interconnected nature of space-time in the theory of relativity.

Coordinate System Origins:

Both coordinate systems originate at the point (0, 0, 0, 0), where there is no change in spatial coordinates, and consequently, no emergence of a time coordinate. This results in the expression (t, x, y, z) = (0, 0, 0, 0).

Implications for Physical Phenomena:

When applied to physical phenomena, this implies that a non-eventful origin of space will not give rise to time. This concept establishes the principle that events invoke time. Thus, an event P at the coordinate origin would be expressed as P(t, x, y, z) = (0, 0, 0, 0), where the lack of change in the spatial coordinates of the event, P(x, y, z) = 0, results in no progression of time (t = 0). However, if there is a change in the spatial coordinates, P(x', y', z') ≠ 0, it will lead to a corresponding change in the time coordinate (t' ≠ 0).

This phenomenon confirms that time is not invoked in the absence of spatial changes in an event, but rather that only eventful existence can invoke time.

#space #event #time #spacetime

The statement, "You'll need to recognize an existence before this existence came into being by the simple fact that we are in this existence, which would not exist without the prior existence," overlooks a critical concept: non-eventful existence does not invoke time—only existential events do.

Time is defined as the indefinite, continuous progression of existence and events through the past, present, and future, regarded as a whole. This progression unfolds in a uniform, unchanging sequence, often referred to as cosmic time, within the context of the fourth dimension, beyond the three spatial dimensions.

This understanding confirms that both existence and events are necessary for time to emerge. Non-eventful existence alone cannot invoke time because time tracks changes in existence. Without changes or events, time becomes meaningless. It is crucial to understand that time does not cause events; rather, events cause time to emerge.

To reiterate: events invoke time, not the other way around.

Therefore, even if there is non-eventful existence, without events, there can be no emergence of time. The Big Bang event marked the first emergence of time, preceding which there was only non-eventful existence.

Time dilation are often viewed not as true experiments, but as demonstrations of preconceived notions:

While I recognize your intellectual acumen, I reckon there may be a misunderstanding regarding the nature of time dilation and the experiments that support it. The numerous published studies confirming time dilation are often viewed not as true experiments, but as demonstrations of preconceived notions. This is because, fundamentally, time itself is not a dilatable entity; rather, events give rise to the concept of time.

Time is defined as the indefinite, continuous progression of existence and events through the past, present, and future, considered as a whole. This progression occurs in a uniform, unchanging sequence, often referred to as cosmic time, within the context of the fourth dimension, above the three spatial dimensions.

Cosmic time is physically represented in clocks and is standardized by the constant frequency of caesium atoms. However, clocks are susceptible to mechanical distortions due to relativistic effects such as motion or gravity. While existential events are physical, time itself is not; it is a conceptual, abstract idea. Therefore, while physical entities can be distorted, time cannot.

Real events in space do not interact with the fourth dimension of time in a way that would allow for distortion through interactions, motion, or gravity. Events in space cannot naturally access the proper time dimension, so their effects cannot alter time beyond its ideal succession, as claimed in the concept of time dilation.

Wavelength distortion due to phase shifts in relative frequency is often misrepresented as time dilation. According to the relation 𝜆 ∝ 𝑇, where 𝜆 denotes wavelength and 𝑇 denotes the period of oscillation, distortion in the clock mechanism affects the wavelength, which is incorrectly interpreted as time dilation.

Clock readings should always follow the natural order of time; otherwise, external distortions will lead to incorrect readings in the clock mechanism. This is why the concept of time dilation is misleading.

Clocks are designed to measure time, not time dilation. The concept of time dilation, which deviates from the standard measure of time, suggests a fundamental error in our understanding of time. The relationship t(360°) < t'(>360°) further illustrates that relativistic time dilation is a flawed concept.

In essence, time is a conceptual or abstract mathematical idea that emerges from events. The phase change in relative frequency, due to the gradual decay of wave energy and the corresponding increase in the wavelength of oscillation, leads to errors in clock time readings when there are relativistic effects or differences in gravitational potential. This phenomenon is inaccurately presented as time dilation.

Refer my research papers in Google Scholar:

scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=QbEr4YMAAAAJ

Best regards

Soumendra Nath Thakur

#timedilation

Explanation to the question, "Why is the existence of time before the Big Bang event meaningless?"

Mr. DAniel Comstock Hixson .

Regarding your comment: "Because time doesn't exist, if it does, explain what came before the Big Bang. I'm new on this page, fellow group members seem pretty smart, but I would love to hear answers."

In my view, 'time' does not exist as a physical entity but rather as a mathematical and abstract concept. Time is the progression of existence and events through the past, present, and future, regarded as a whole. This means that both existence and events are necessary for time to emerge.

As for the notion that 'time explains what came before the Big Bang,' this reflects a misunderstanding. The Big Bang theory predicts a primordial, uneventful existence before the Big Bang event, which then unfolded through the first Big Bang event. This implies that time began with the emergence of both existence and events, not just the existence of events alone. The Big Bang theory does not hint at the occurrence of events before the Big Bang, so any pre-Big Bang existence without events would not give rise to the concept of time. Therefore, without empirical evidence of events before the Big Bang, it is meaningless to conceptualize time in that context, so time cannot explain what came before the Big Bang when there were no events except uneventful existence.

Best regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur

#time

Why is the existence of time before the Big Bang event meaningless?

Soumendra Nath Thakur

In scientific view, 'time' does not exist as a physical entity but rather as a mathematical and abstract concept. Time is the progression of existence and events through the past, present, and future, regarded as a whole. This means that both existence and events are necessary for time to emerge.

The Big Bang theory predicts a primordial, uneventful existence before the Big Bang event, which then unfolded through the first Big Bang event. This implies that time began with the emergence of both existence and events, not just the existence of events alone.

The Big Bang theory does not hint at the occurrence of events before the Big Bang, so any pre-Big Bang existence without events would not give rise to the concept of time.

Therefore, without empirical evidence of events before the Big Bang, it is meaningless to conceptualize time in that context, so time cannot explain what came before the Big Bang when there were no events except uneventful existence.

Update:

The Emergence of Time and the Big Bang: A Synthesis of Events, Existence, and Cosmological Evidence

13 August 2024

Events necessitate the existence of time, rather than time dictating the occurrence of events. The very notion of time emerges only through the presence of events; without events—i.e., without changes in existence—time would hold no significance. In a hypothetical scenario devoid of events, where no change occurs in existence, time would not manifest. Time is, therefore, inherently tied to the occurrence of events, marking the changes within existence. The initiation of the universe, as proposed by the Big Bang, represents the first event, signifying the inception of time itself.

The Big Bang theory postulates a primordial state of uneventful existence preceding the Big Bang event, which catalysed the unfolding of the universe. This suggests that time commenced with the advent of both existence and events, rather than with the mere existence of events. The theory does not suggest the presence of events before the Big Bang; hence, any pre-Big Bang existence without events would not give rise to the concept of time. Consequently, without empirical evidence of events predating the Big Bang, it is futile to conceptualize time in that context, as time cannot account for what preceded the Big Bang in the absence of events.

The assertion that 'the Big Bang is a mathematical calculation based on reverse engineering of an expanding Universe' is an oversimplification.

Three pivotal scientific discoveries strongly underpin the Big Bang theory:

1. Hubble's discovery in the 1920s of the relationship between a galaxy's distance from Earth and its velocity, evidencing the expansion of space.
2. The detection of cosmic microwave background radiation in the 1960s.
3. The observed abundances of elements in the universe.

These discoveries can be succinctly summarized as:

• The redshift of galaxies.
• The cosmic microwave background.
• The distribution of elements.
• The ability to observe the universe's history.

The redshift observed in the light from distant galaxies indicates that the universe is expanding, making distant galaxies appear closer in time. The Big Bang theory predicts the existence of a pervasive 'glow,' detectable as microwave radiation, which has been confirmed by astronomers using orbiting detectors. Furthermore, the chemical elements such as hydrogen and helium, formed shortly after the Big Bang, differ in abundance from those in newer stars, which contain material synthesized by older stars. The evidence from these distant galaxies aligns more consistently with the Big Bang theory than with the steady-state theory.

Time Arises Through Events, Not the Reverse

Events necessitate the existence of time, rather than time dictating the occurrence of events. The very notion of time emerges only through the presence of events; without events—i.e., without changes in existence—time would hold no significance. In a hypothetical scenario devoid of events, where no change occurs in existence, time would not manifest. Time is, therefore, inherently tied to the occurrence of events, marking the changes within existence. The initiation of the universe, as proposed by the Big Bang, represents the first event, signifying the inception of time itself.

#time #event #events

Preconceptions arise from beliefs.

It’s not particularly concerning if many people don’t understand these subjects. What is more troubling is the preconceived notion that these subjects would be deemed baseless if they challenge any aspect of Einstein’s theory of relativity—as if nothing Einstein proposed could be false, which contradicts the scientific principle of falsifiability.

These individuals fail to recognize that by not addressing the inherent flaws in the theory of relativity, they may ultimately hinder the proper advancement of science.

Nevertheless, numerous researchers and scientists around the world appreciate and endorse such subjects, as they possess a deeper understanding of science than most.

It is evident that many people, including some scientists, continue to hold beliefs akin to those in religious systems. However, science is not grounded in belief systems. Even in the 21st century, many remain confined by such belief systems.