Mɢ = Mᴍ + Mᴅᴇ
Mɢ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)
Eᴛₒₜ = PE + KE
PE = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)
Eᴛₒₜ = [Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)] + KE
KE = −Mᵃᵖᵖ
Eᴛₒₜ = [Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)] + KE
Eᴛₒₜ = Mᴍ
Mᴛₒₜ = Eᴛₒₜ
Mɢ = Mᴍ + Mᴅᴇ
Mɢ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)
Eᴛₒₜ = PE + KE
PE = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)
Eᴛₒₜ = [Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)] + KE
KE = −Mᵃᵖᵖ
Eᴛₒₜ = [Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)] + KE
Eᴛₒₜ = Mᴍ
Mᴛₒₜ = Eᴛₒₜ
Mɢ = Mᴍ + Mᴅᴇ
Mɢ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)
Eᴛₒₜ = PE + KE
PE = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)
Eᴛₒₜ = [Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)] + KE
KE = −Mᵃᵖᵖ
This comprehensive Q&A session delves into the intricacies of extended classical mechanics, exploring its unique approach to gravitational dynamics, cosmic structures, magnetic fields, and high-energy phenomena. The discussion addresses critical questions on how this framework reinterprets the formation and evolution of galaxy clusters, cosmic magnetic fields, and the behaviour of quasars and blazars. It also examines the implications of effective mass, magneto-hydrodynamics, and gravitational interactions on the large-scale structure of the universe. By integrating principles of classical physics with modern insights, this analysis provides a fresh perspective on the fundamental processes shaping the cosmos.
Click on the question links to reach the answer page.
1. How does this extended classical mechanics
framework address the cosmological constant's
2. Can this extended classical mechanics framework be applied to quantum systems?
3. What evidence supports the negative effective mass concept in extended classical mechanics?
6. How does extended classical mechanics address the issue of singularity and black hole physics?
9. How does extended classical mechanics address the cosmological horizon problem?
13. Can the framework explain the observed properties of blazars and active galactic nuclei (AGN)?
15. Can the framework explain the observed properties of quasars and their redshift distributions?
Keywords: Gravitational Dynamics, Cosmic Structures, Magnetic Fields, High-Energy Phenomena, Mass-Energy Interactions
#GravitationalDynamics, #CosmicStructures, #MagneticFields, #HighEnergyPhenomena, #MassEnergyInteractions,
This extended classical mechanics framework addresses the cosmological constant's role in dark energy by highlighting the distinct historical and conceptual differences between the two. Einstein introduced the cosmological constant (Λ) in 1917 to balance gravitational forces and prevent the universe's collapse under General Relativity, based on the assumption of a static universe. However, with the discovery of the universe's expansion, Einstein abandoned Λ, recognizing it as unnecessary for a dynamic cosmos. The later emergence of dark energy arose from observations of an accelerating universe, indicating complex, dynamic interactions far beyond the simplistic repulsive force Λ was originally intended to represent. Contrary to misconceptions that equate Λ with dark energy, the cosmological constant was not devised to explain expansion and lacks the intricate physical implications of dark energy. Extended classical mechanics further elucidates that dark energy is not a mysterious substance but a consequence of motion and gravitational dynamics, reinforcing that Λ’s static universe concept is irrelevant to the modern understanding of cosmic acceleration. Therefore, resurrecting the cosmological constant to account for dark energy misunderstands its purpose and history, highlighting its abandonment as a relic of outdated cosmological thought rather than a viable explanation for contemporary observations.
Reference:
1.
Chernin, A. D., Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G. S., Teerikorpi, P., Valtonen, M. J., Byrd,
G. G., & Merafina, M. (2013). Dark energy and the structure of the Coma
cluster of galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 553, A101. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220781
2. Thakur,
S. N. (2024c). Extended Classical Mechanics: Vol-1 - Equivalence Principle,
Mass and Gravitational Dynamics. Preprints.org (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1190.v2
The extended classical mechanics framework primarily addresses macroscopic structures and dynamics within the universe, focusing on large-scale phenomena such as gravitational dynamics, mass-energy interactions, and cosmic motion. In contrast, quantum systems operate at the micro scale, dealing with the fundamental particles and forces that govern atomic and subatomic behaviour. These two frameworks operate in fundamentally different domains, with extended classical mechanics tailored to the vast and continuous scales of the universe, while quantum mechanics addresses discrete and probabilistic interactions at the microscopic level. Therefore, the principles and applications of extended classical mechanics are distinct from those of quantum mechanics, as each framework is specifically designed to address the unique characteristics of its respective scale. As such, direct application of extended classical mechanics to quantum systems is not appropriate, given the intrinsic differences in scale, behaviour, and governing laws between macroscopic and microscopic phenomena.
Reference:
1.
Chernin, A. D., Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G. S., Teerikorpi, P., Valtonen, M. J., Byrd,
G. G., & Merafina, M. (2013). Dark energy and the structure of the Coma
cluster of galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 553, A101. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220781
2.
Thakur, S. N. (2024c). Extended Classical Mechanics: Vol-1 - Equivalence
Principle, Mass and Gravitational Dynamics. Preprints.org (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1190.v2