Dear Dr. Seyed kazem Mousavi ,
I appreciate your engagement in a lively discussion about the direction of physics. It is undeniable that physics, as the study of the physical world, should ideally retain its roots in physical, intuitive concepts. There is an ongoing debate in the scientific community about the balance between abstract mathematics and physical reality, a debate that has been a concern for decades.
The emphasis on the transition from physical reality to abstract mathematics in fundamental physics is significant and quite popular. An example of this concern is relative time dilation. The distinction between "real" or "natural" time and abstract time is an intriguing one.
The concerns you raise about the acceptance of abstract concepts such as virtual particles, interaction exchange theory, probability waves and black holes, are shared by a minority within the physics community. They advocate a more conservative approach, demanding a closer connection between theoretical concepts and empirical data and physical intuition.
Your point that physicists may be inclined to adopt models that are too abstract and exciting for public acceptance, potentially introducing absurd concepts into fundamental physics, is well taken. Public perception can indeed influence the direction of research. Balancing the communication of exciting ideas with maintaining scientific rigor is a challenging endeavor, not unique to physics but relevant to many scientific fields.
The tension between mathematical abstraction and physical intuition remains a long-standing challenge. Although mathematics is a powerful tool for understanding the physical world, it is essential that mathematical models are firmly based on experimental evidence, ensuring that they are not divorced from physical reality.
In your submission, you highlighted unconventional ideas that extend physics into six dimensions and that these ideas provide certainty for possible results in quantum mechanics. It is important to note that such extraordinary claims would require substantial empirical evidence to be taken seriously.
Similarly, the claim that energy can be generated from gravitational fields is ambitious and requires strong experimental support.
Your submission that three-dimensional waves oscillate in the fourth dimension is an abstract concept and the claim that gravitational waves cannot penetrate higher dimensions is not well established in current physics.
The reference to a "Ritchie tensor" in six dimensions for an alternative theory involving quantum mechanics is not a common reference in mainstream physics.
In short, unconventional ideas have the potential to lead to significant advances, but they should be rigorously tested, validated, and aligned with existing physical theories considered within the scientific community. Until then, they remain speculative and should be treated as such.
Thank you for your valuable contribution to this thought-provoking discussion.
Sincerely,
Soumendra Nath Thakur
*-*-*-*-*-*
Seyed kazem Mousavi's reply
Greetings
Dear professors,
You can pass through two gates in time like an electron. The wave function has an expansion in time. The z dimension is imaginary for two-dimensional beings on the surface of the expanding sphere. They see the time and the z dimension in one dimension. Time has It is an internal dimension. Time exerts twice as much stress on matter as compared to space. Double stress is directly related to the golden constant. All objects have spin. Every mass has a field in over time. It is constantly changing.
As a result, three dimensions of time and three dimensions of space make our world. Movement in space limits movement in time. Time dilation.
The electric field bends one dimension of time, and the magnetic field bends the other dimension of time. The gravitational field bends both dimensions. As a result, a gravitational field can be produced with an electromagnetic field.
Two-dimensional water surface waves oscillate in the third dimension, and three-dimensional waves oscillate in the fourth dimension. Do water surface waves bend the third dimension? no
As a result, gravitational waves cannot penetrate to higher dimensions.
For an alternative theory that incorporates quantum mechanics, the Ritchie tensor must be defined in six dimensions.
"The General Balance In The Six Dimensions Space-Time"
Forgive my boldness.
No comments:
Post a Comment