The
outer event horizon of a black hole acts like a point of no return. So you will
fall into a black hole but will have no means to come out of it as soon as you
reach the outer event horizon of a black hole, as if you have entered into a
strong whirlpool, within water and so you cannot come out but to fall within it.
So you fall into a black hole against your wish to come out of it as soon as you
reach outer event horizon of a black hole.
30 November 2022
Why do you fall into a black hole and not on it?
29 November 2022
Conversion of universal vibration - vibration and wave their differences.
Vibration and wave their differences
Anything that moves back and forth, to and fro, side to side, in and out, or up and down is vibrating, a vibration is a periodic jiggles in time.
Such a periodic jiggles in both space and time is a wave. A wave extends from one place to another.
Universal vibration
Combining Planck's energy frequency equivalence and Einstein's energy-mass equivalence, we get - hf = E = mc^2.
Therefore, hf = mc^2.
This derives the relation between mass and frequency -
m ∝ f
when h and c are constants. Relativistic mass (m) interacts with gravity as well as electromagnetism.
Accordingly, matter and energy certainly vibrates, whether such vibrations are wave or not.
Note: the strings in the string theories appear to convey the above conclusion.
Conversion of vibrations
Combining Planck's energy frequency equivalence and general equation of wave, we get - E = hf = hc/λ.
Energies in quantum physics are commonly expressed in electron volts (1 eV = 1.6 × 10^−9 J) and wavelengths are typically given in nanometers (1 nm = 10^−9 m).
The Plank's equation is not only applicable to photons, but as we know, it's applicable to all form of waves, as long as there is measurable frequency of a wave or oscillation, it's applicable.
The Planck's equation adequately gives us a better picture of the universe that the existence in the Universe fundamentally consisting of vibrations, and as vibration energy dissipates in transmission due to spatial expansions, gravitational redshift etc. its energy and so frequency too lowers and so converts in other forms.
There are three known types of redshifts, - Doppler redshift, gravitational redshift and cosmological redshift.
The corresponding formulas for this redshift are –
• Z = {λ(obs)-λ(rest)}/λ(rest) ;
• Z = Δλ/λ₀ and also
• Z = Δλ/λ₀,
Where,
• Z denotes the redshift factor which represents the fractional change in wavelength;
• λ(obs) represents the observed wavelength of light;
• λ(rest) represents the rest wavelength of light;
• Δλ is the change in wavelength of light as observed;
• λ₀ is the wavelength at the source
1. Doppler redshift, a phenomenon observed in the context of the Doppler effect. The Doppler effect describes the change in the frequency or wavelength of a wave as a result of the relative motion between the wave source and the observer.
In the context of light, Doppler redshift refers to the observed increase in wavelength (or decrease in frequency) of light from a source moving away from the observer. The formula given above calculates the redshift factor, denoted "Z", which represents the fractional change in wavelength.
In the formula, λ(obs) represents the observed wavelength of light, while λ(rest) represents the remaining wavelength of light, which is the wavelength that would be measured if the source were stationary relative to the observer.
By comparing the observed wavelength with the rest wavelength, the Doppler redshift can be determined, which indicates the relative motion between the source and the observer. A positive value of Z indicates that the source is moving away, causing the observed wavelength to become longer (red-shifted), whereas a negative value of Z indicates motion toward the observer (blue-shifted).
Doppler redshift has important applications in many fields of science, including astronomy, where it is used to study the motion and expansion of celestial objects such as galaxies and large-scale structures in the universe. It provides valuable information about the velocity and distance of these objects based on observed changes in their spectral lines.
2. Gravitational redshift, denoted Z, is a phenomenon predicted by the theory of general relativity. This refers to the change in wavelength (or equivalently, frequency) of light as it travels through a gravitational field, such as near a massive object.
As light travels through a gravitational field, it loses energy in the light, causing it to shift to longer wavelengths (or lower frequencies). The formula given above calculates the redshift factor, denoted "Z", which represents the fractional change in wavelength.
The magnitude of the gravitational redshift depends on the strength of the gravitational field experienced by the light and the proximity of the massive object. The closer the light source is to a massive object, or the stronger the gravitational field it crosses, the greater the redshift observed.
Gravitational redshift has been observed and measured in a variety of contexts, such as in experiments conducted on Earth and through astronomical observations. This provided evidence for the gravitational nature of light and confirmed predictions of gravitational fields.
3. Cosmic redshift (Z) is a phenomenon observed in astronomy in which light emitted from distant celestial objects such as galaxies or quasars is shifted to longer wavelengths (lower frequencies) as it travels through expanding distance. This is the result of the expansion of distance among the objects in the universe.
According to the conventional cosmological model, the Big Bang theory, the universe is constantly expanding. As space expands, it carries light waves with it, causing them to expand and resulting in a red shift. The formula given above calculates the redshift factor, denoted "Z", which represents the fractional change in wavelength.
The magnitude of the cosmic redshift is directly related to the distance between the observer and the light source. The farther away an object is, the more space it has traveled during its journey and the greater the observed cosmic redshift.
Cosmic redshifts have been observed and measured in countless astronomical observations, providing strong evidence for the expansion of the distance within the universe. The redshift of distant galaxies was first observed by Edwin Hubble in the 1920s, leading to the discovery of the expanding distance within the universe and the formulation of Hubble's law, which describes the relationship between the redshift of galaxies and their distance from us.
Cosmological redshift is an essential tool in studying the large-scale structure and evolution of the universe. It allows astronomers to estimate the distances to remote objects, determine the expansion rate of the universe (Hubble constant), and investigate the nature of dark energy, which is believed to be driving the accelerated expansion of the distance within the universe.
Reasons of various redshifts
"The reasons of the red-shifts (z, >1) are actually the results of lowered energy (E) of the waves or, lowered frequency (f) of the waves or increased wavelength (λ) of the waves. The wavelength of the wave vibrations change due to phase shift of the vibration frequencies, and so ultimately the wavelengths shift to the red side in the electromagnetic spectrum depending upon the energy decrease of the wave vibration due to various effects like Doppler, relativistic and, expansion of space. And also, in case of energy increase of the wave, the phase-shift will result shorter wavelengths to shift the wavelength towards the blue side of the electromagnetic spectrum, known as blue shift"
Explanation:
Vibration (frequency) can be two dimensional i.e. up and down in x-y plane and also back and forth in x-z plane, when electromagnetic vibrations occur in both planes simultaneously, so frequencies of these vibrations of both planes are synchronized normally and those phases of vibration waves began from the origin location (0,0,0) normally.
The equations those are relevant here are
f = 1/T = E/h = c/λ.
Where, f = frequency of the wave, T is time period of the wave, E = energy of the wave, h = Planck’s constant, c = constant speed of light, λ = wavelength of the wave, when 1° phase shift = T/360.
However, in case of (i) relative movement from such a vibration or (ii) for relativistic effects, or (iii) cosmic expansions, the phase of the vibration frequencies shift from its earlier position (say 0,0,0) to a new position due to relevant interactions out of these effects.
The time interval T(deg) for 1° of phase is inversely proportional to the frequency (f). We get a wave corresponds to time shift, and for 1° phase shift on a 5 MHz wave corresponds to a time shift of 555 picoseconds, and so on, for corresponding phase shifts in degree (°).
As a result, the wavelength of the vibration changes due to phase shift of the vibration frequencies, and so ultimately it shift to the red side in the spectrum relevant depending upon the energy decrease of the vibration due to various effects said or in case of energy increase the phase shift will result shorter wavelength to shift towards blue of the spectrum relevant.
This is what happens irrespective of the vibrations is in plane or in space.
E.g. a light signal converts into infrared, then microwave, even into radio waves. All these are result of dissipation of wave energy. The Planks equation so conveys us.
The value of a redshift is denoted by the letter z, corresponding to the fractional change in wavelength, positive for redshifts, negative for blueshifts, and by the wavelength ratio 1 + z, which is >1 for redshifts, <1 for blueshifts.
Redshift is z, is >1 is the displacement of spectral lines towards longer wavelengths (>λ) i.e. the red end of the electromagnetic spectrum.
The electromagnetic radiation, like light, from distant galaxies and celestial objects, interpreted as a Doppler shift that is proportional to the velocity of recession and thus to distance of the galaxy.
Moreover, the universe is expanding, and that expansion stretches the wavelength of light traveling through space in a phenomenon known as cosmological redshift.
Furthermore, there is gravitational redshift, also known as Einstein shift, it is the phenomenon that electromagnetic waves or photons travelling out of a gravitational well lose energy, this corresponds to longer wavelengths (λ).
The spectroscopy is used as a tool for studying the structures of atoms and molecules. The large number of wavelengths emitted by these systems makes it possible to investigate their structures in detail, including the electron configurations of ground and various excited states. From spectral lines astronomers can determine not only the element, but the temperature and density of that element in the star. The spectral line also can tell us about any magnetic field of the star. The width of the line can tell us how fast the material is moving.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Some Mr. X countered my post stating, "Planck relationship is for photons only hence m = 0. Thus it can be proven hf = 0. The Einstein relationship applies to anything with mass, hence not to photons.
And so this is how I have made him scientifically wrong.
"You have ignored to see that E = hf is applicable to energy carrying electromagnetic waves too.
As photon is a gauge boson, carrier of electromagnetic force, or weak interaction. Photon energy cannot be = 0.
m ∝ f (where h and c are constants). This expression does not mean m = f, So, this does not mean hf = 0,
Alternatively, if I question when photon mass m = 0 does this mean mc^2 = 0 too, or a photon does have a 0 energy?
Said m ∝ f expression conveys relationship between relativistic mass and wave frequency, where a photon does have relativistic mass so relativistic mass m can't be = 0.
The energy of a single photon is hν or = (h/2π) ω where h is Planck's constant: 6.626 x 10^-34 Joule-sec. So one photon of visible light contains about 10^-19 Joules of energy, and so it cannot be = 0 if you refer it in relativistic sense.
Therefore, you are wrong to say, "The Einstein relationship applies to anything with mass, hence not to photons." because a photon does have relativistic mass and also contains about 10^-19 Joules of energy, so m =0 does not apply for a photon in speed."
#frequency #wave #energy #disipation #ConversionOfVibrations #vibration
#Redshifts #DopplerRedshift #GravitationalRedshift #CosmicRedshift #Wavelength #Frequency #WaveEnergy #PhaseShift
27 November 2022
Emergence of space and time - not natural:
It is obvious and scientifically valid to claim, through the scientific interpretation of the prevailing Universal formation between it's existence in singularity and the begining of the existential events, that both - space and time - emerge from the beginning of the Universal events.
Space is fundamentally defined as the dimensions of height, depth, and width within which all things exist and move, and dimension is a measurable extent of a particular kind, such as length, breadth, depth, or height.
Whereas space and time, both, are fundamentally conceptual, rather abstract mathematical entities and so they are not natural, nor real.
By the word 'natural' we generally mean something existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind, and by the word 'real' we generally mean something actually existing as a thing or occurring in fact; not imagined or supposed.
Whereas, Wikipedia defined abstraction in mathematics as the process of extracting the underlying structures, patterns or properties of a mathematical concept, removing any dependence on real world objects with which it might originally have been connected, and generalizing it so that it has wider applications or matching among other abstract descriptions of equivalent phenomena.
Wikipedia also defined time as the indefinite continued progress of existence and events in the past, present, and future regarded as a whole, succeeds in irreversible and uniformed succession, referred in fourth dimension above three spatial dimensions. This means events invoke time.
And so, the emergence of space and time do not depend on existence - in any of its forms, singularity or eventual - but such emergence entirely depend on the existential events.
The begining of the Universal events signify the emergence of space and time but no other.
Therefore, through the relevant verification of science, mathematics, and philosophy, if it's established that space and time are not natural entities but conceptual emergents, this will greatly shock our present understanding in cosmology and that would pave they way to a new understanding in science and it's laws as we know today.
And such possibilities certainly would challenge Relativity in fundamental level, would require its restructuring.
24 November 2022
Is the difference between the past and future friction?
No physicists are above science but they likely to interpret the laws of science.
The statement if difference between the past and future friction, is a surmised and misunderstood statement in the Universe. As there is no such resistance the universal events can encounter when moving through free space. And so a question of friction between past and future dose not arise.
However, events invoke time.
So what actually happening with the occurrences of the universal events are conversion of potential energy into kinetic energy and corresponding dissipation of infinitesimal energy throughout the free space, as they move out from the universal supergravity or singularity.
We may have a better understanding in it, if we consider Max Planck's equation E=hf. Energy-frequency equivalence equation. At the threshold of Planck frequency, the Universe disobeys the known laws of physics, when supergravity acting on the universal energy content at or beyond the threshold frequencies.
There seem no other fundamental interactions acting on the universal energy except supergravity, abstract mathematics would hint that. Dark energy, in presence of supergravity, seems to prevail beyond the threshold frequency.
As the field of dark energy appears to cause inflation against the supergravity, the universal energy content expands due to the anti-gravitational push, space extends all of its dimensions, and time already began before the inflation. The universal energy content expands and cools down through dissipation of energy and scattering.
There is no counter resistance to the universal energy but the respective pull and push of supergravity and Dark energy, where Dark energy wins.
No
frictional effect anywhere in the happening.
18 November 2022
Conversion of vibrations:
E = hf = hc/λ. The Planck equation and its equivalent.
The Plank's equation is not only applicable to photons, but as we know, it's applicable to all forms of waves, as long as there is measurable frequency of a wave or oscillation, it's applicable.
The Planck's equation adequately gives us a better picture of the universe that the existence in the Universe fundamentally consisting of vibrations and, as vibrational energy dissipates in transmission due to spatial expansions, gravitational redshift etc. its energy and so its frequency get reduced and so converted in other forms.
E.g. a light signal converts into infrared, then microwave, even into radio waves. All these are the result of dissipation of wave energy.
The Planck's equation so conveys us.
Planck's constant h = 6.625 × 10–34 Js
My opinion about space and time:
I am in the opinion that space is rather a three-dimensional (x,y,z) mathematical concept, where real energetic fields exist and interact, than a fabric of space-time.
13 November 2022
The inherent feature of time:
In a statement, "... time is nonexistent.": - Replied.
Yes, time is non-existent in reality. This means not in real existence or not in actual existence. However, the concept of time is in its abstract form. - Abstraction is the process of considering concepts divested from its reference to real world objects. -
So time is not dependent on reality with which it might originally have been connected.
While events invoke time.
12 November 2022
Relativistic effects on phaseshift in frequencies invalidate time dilation.
Relativistic effects on phaseshift in frequencies invalidate time dilation II
Soumendra Nath Thakur¹+ Priyanka Samal² Deep Bhattacharjee
¹Tagore's Electronic Lab. India
²Berhampur University, India
³INS Research, Department of Geometry & Topology, India ³Electro Gravitational Space Propulsion Laboratory, India ³Actual Intelligence Division, CXAI Technologies Ltd, Cyprus
+Corresponding author ¹postmasterenator@gmail.com ¹postmasterenator@telitnetwork.in
²priyankasamal9437@gmail.com
³itsdeep@live.co
¹ ² ³The authors have no conflict of interests related to this paper
MAY 2023
REFERENCE – 20 TITLES
Abstract: Relative time emerges from relative frequencies. It is the phase shift in relative frequencies due to infinitesimal loss in wave energy and corresponding enlargement in the wavelengths of oscillations; which occur in any clock between relative locations due to the relativistic effects or difference in gravitational potential; result error in the reading of clock time; which is wrongly presented as time dilation.
Comments: Minor errors rectified; Equations formatted; Version 2.1
DOI https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.22492066.v1
Keywords: phase shift, relativistic effects, wavelength dilation, piezoelectric crystal oscillator,
Introduction:
The Theory of Relativity adopts Minkowski spacetime that combines three-dimensional Euclidean space and fourth dimensional time into a four-dimensional manifold, wherein time is robbed of its independence, rather considered 'natural'.
The Theory of Relativity also conveys that the proper time is dependent on relativistic effects and expressed as 𝑡 < 𝑡′, where t' is time dilation. The equation of time dilation is 𝑡՚ = 𝑡/√(1 − 𝑣²/𝑐²) where 𝑡′ is dilated time, 𝑡 is proper time, v is relative speed, and c is the speed of light in free space.
The points in consideration here are –
- 'Proper time' including 'relative time' is not natural or the event itself but an emerging concept, mathematical in character.
- 'Space' is not natural or eventual itself but a three-dimensional extent as a mathematical concept.
- Whether 'spacetime,' which combines three-dimensional Euclidean space and fourth-dimensional time into a four-dimensional manifold, is not natural, nor eventual itself, nor dependent on relativistic effects but a four-dimensional extent as a mathematical concept.
- Whether time is not distorted due to relativistic effects.
The conjectural equation of time dilation was based on Doppler's formula, which failed to identify any cause of time distortion. Whereas the wave equation; in the properties of a wave, in combination with the Planck equation has been able to successfully identify the distorted frequencies due to the relativistic effect that has the influence factor. The distorted frequencies in the equation yield a relative value of time for the corresponding wavelength dilation, which is erroneously known as time dilation.
This expression for time in time dilation contradicts the expression t=t' as in classical mechanics, where time is absolute. Stephen Hawking upheld the concept of imaginary time in his book "The Universe in a Nutshell". Time is defined as the indefinite continued progression of events in the past, present and future existences and considered as a whole, succeeding in irreversible and uniformed succession, which is referred to in the fourth dimension above the three spatial dimensions. Therefore, events invoke time but not vice versa. What special relativity represents in time dilation is not time, and time dilation does not have time. It is rather error in the clock oscillation.
Counterexamples such as experiments made on piezoelectric crystal oscillators show that wave distortions correspond to time distortions due to relativistic effects, thus disproving the conjectural equation of time dilation; and invalidates time dilation altogether. The time dilation equation 𝑡՚ = 𝑡/√(1 − 𝑣²/𝑐²) is wrong.
A scientific misconception in time dilation:
Events invoke time. The defect in the equation 𝑡՚ = 𝑡/√(1 − 𝑣²/𝑐²) is that relativistic effects, such as speed or gravity of the real events, can never interact with the proper time (𝑡) referred to in the fourth dimension. This means, the {1/√(1 − 𝑣²/𝑐²)} part of the equation cannot influence or interact with the proper time (𝑡) to enlarge it and get the time dilation (𝑡′) as in the equation. The piezoelectric crystal oscillators show that the error in wave corresponds to time shift due to relativistic effects.
The observations made on the effect of dark energy do not show anti-gravity, caused by dark energy, affects time in any manner, except causing enlargement in the wavelength due to expansion of space. It is naturally unauthorized and disprovable to enlarge the scale of proper time, instead of distortion in the wavelength of clock oscillation.Even very small changes in the gravitational forces (G-force) cause internal particles of matter to interact with each other, which is known to cause stresses and associated deformations in the internal matter.
Wavelength distortions, due to the phase shift in relative frequencies, correspond exactly to time distortion; through the relationship 𝜆 ∝ 𝑇, where 𝜆 denotes the wavelength and 𝑇 denotes the period of oscillation of the wave. So that relativistic effects, such as speed or gravitational potential differences, affect the clock mechanism because of phase shifts in the frequencies and corresponding increase in the wavelength of the clock oscillation, resulting errors in reading of the clock time, but incorrectly perceived as time dilation.
Real events in space never reach the fourth direction of time, either through interactions or relativistic effects such as motion or gravity. Events within space will not have a natural reach toward the dimension of proper time, so that eventual effects can never affect proper time beyond its ideal succession, to obtain time dilation. A clock reading should always follow the order of time sequence; otherwise, the external distortion will cause incorrect readings in the clock mechanism. The dimension of time is considered abstract rather, conceptual.
It would be wrong to try to change proper time like in the conjectural equation of time dilation. Relativistic effects cannot interact with proper time to get time dilation. Apart from this, the concept of time dilation defies the conventional scientific definition of time involving existence and events. Proper time should never be stripped of its independence and retained as 'natural' even in the four-dimensional continuum of spacetime. There is no time dilation anywhere; instead, the dilation of the wavelength of the clock oscillation causing errors in the clock time. Wavelength distortions mathematically correspond exactly to time distortions; as in 𝜆 ∝ 𝑇.
General Foundations:
Time is called 𝑇, the period of oscillation, so that 𝑇 = 2𝜋/𝜔. The reciprocal of the period, or the frequency 𝑓,in oscillations per second, is given by the expression 𝑓 = 1/𝑇 = 𝜔/2𝜋 = 𝐸/ℎ = 𝑣/𝜆. Where h is Planck constant, 𝑓, 𝑣, 𝜆, 𝑇 and 𝐸 respectively represent frequency, velocity, wavelength, time period and Energy of the wave.Doppler shift is the change in frequency of a wave in relation to an observer who is moving relative to the wave source.
Time distortion always originates from wavelength distortion but the time dilation of special relativity is not understood from wavelength distortion and so it does not follow the general rules.
Special relativity does not escape the fundamental equivalence between wavelengths and time, which is much more general than special relativity.
Distortions of wavelengths exactly correspond to time distortions λ∝T.
Time is the indefinite continued progress of existence and events in the past, present, and future regarded as a whole, succeeding in irreversible and uniformed succession, referred to in the fourth dimension above three spatial dimensions. Therefore, time is not what special relativity presents as in time dilation and there is no time in time dilation. It is rather error the in wave.
Time is an imperceptible fourth dimensional concept so protected from relativistic effects like speed or gravity, nor it subject to real interference or influence or interaction with the cosmic events. The events rather invoke time.
The term cosmic time signifies a relationship between the time since the Big Bang and the events within the Universe. The distortion in proper time always originates from wavelength distortion, including in special relativity, and therefore proper time subject to synchronization with ideal time in near approximation, as done with the atomic clocks.
Eperimental result
Experiments made in electronic laboratories on piezoelectric crystal oscillators show that the wave corresponds to time shift due to relativistic effects.
We get the wavelength 𝜆 of a wave is directly proportional to the time period T of the wave, that is 𝜆 ∝ 𝑇, derived from the wave equation 𝑓 = 𝑣/𝜆 = 1/𝑇 = 𝐸/ℎ where h is Planck constant and 𝑓, 𝑣, 𝜆, 𝑇 and 𝐸 represent frequency, velocity, wavelength, time period and Energy of the wave respectively.
Whereas the time interval 𝑇(𝑑𝑒𝑔) for 1° of phase is inversely proportional to the frequency (𝑓). We get a wave corresponding to the time shift
For example, 1° phase shift on a 5 MHz wave corresponds to a time shift of 555 picoseconds (ps).
We know, 1° phase shift = 𝑇/360. As 𝑇 = 1/𝑓,
- 1° phase shift = 𝑇/360 = (1/𝑓)/360
- For a wave of frequency 𝑓 = 5 𝑀𝐻𝑧, we get the phase shift (in degree°)
- = (1/5000000)/360
- = 5.55 𝑥 10ˉ¹º
- = 555 𝑝𝑠.
Therefore, for 1° phase shift for a wave having a frequency 𝑓 = 5 𝑀𝐻𝑧, and so wavelength 𝜆 = 59.95 𝑚, the time shift (time delay) 𝛥𝑡 = 555 𝑝𝑠 (approx).
Moreover, for 360° phase shift or, 1 complete cycle for a wave having frequency 1Hz (of a 9192631770 Hz wave); the time shift (time delay) 𝛥𝑡 = 0.0000001087827757077666 ms (approx).
Time shift of the caesium-133 atomic clock in the GPS satellite: The GPS satellites orbit at an altitude of about 20,000 km. with a time delay of about 38 microseconds per day.
For 1455.50003025° phase shift (or, 4.043055639583333 cycles) of a 9192631770 Hz wave; time shifts (time delays) 𝛥𝑡 = 0.0000004398148148148148 𝑚𝑠 (approx) or, 38 microsecond time is taken per day
Conclusion:
The phase shifts of frequency due to gravitational potential differences or relativistic effects correspond to dilation of wavelengths of the clock oscillation, which show errors in the clock reading and are misrepresented as time dilation. Time dilation is actually wavelength dilation.
References:
- The Special and General Theory by Albert Einstein. (n.d.). Project Gutenberg. Retrieved October 28, 2022, from https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5001
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2021a). Positive Energy Driven CTCs In ADM 3+1 Space – Time of Unprotected Chronology. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202104.0277.v1
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2021a). Path Tracing Photons Oscillating Through Alternate Universes Inside a Black Hole. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202104.0293.v1
- Time and Frequency from A to Z, P. (2016, September 26). NIST. https://bit.ly/3XLddOX
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2021a). Deciphering Black Hole Spin, Inclination angle & Charge From Kerr Shadow. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202104.0315.v1
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2022). Universe before Big Bang. Asian Journal of Research and Reviews in Physics, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajr2p/2022/v6i3120
- Sher, D. (1968). "The Relativistic Doppler Effect". Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada.Bibcode:1968JRASC..62..105S Page 105. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2022, https://bit.ly/3RmCeh6
- Time and the Big Bang – Exactly What Is Time? (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2022, from https://bit.ly/3WOgStQ
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2022a). A shift in norms of gravity and space-time encompassing the complex Newman-Penrose tetrads of general relativity incorporating the constraints of humanity related to extraterrestrials. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.20180051.v1
- Oxford University Press. Archived Retrieved October 28, 2022 Definition for time - Oxford Dictionaries Online (World English). (n.d.). https://bit.ly/404rGqy
- Libretexts. (2021, March 14). 17.5: Geometry of Space-time. Physics LibreTexts. https://bit.ly/3D9UrIP
- Bhattacharjeee, D. (2022). Art of Natural Philosophy. EasyChair Preprint No. 8206. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/WRRr
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2022a). Echoes from the Eleventh Dimensions – Musings of Physics from Outer Space. EasyChair Preprint No. 7956. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/msS2
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2022b). Non-Trivial Axioms, Norms, Scales, Symmetries of Physical Laws with Selected Writings. EasyChair Preprint No. 7955. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/kF2v
- Wave Properties: Speed, Amplitude, Frequency, and Period - Physics | OpenStax. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2022, from https://bit.ly/3WGKMQZ
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2021). The Gateway to Parallel Universe & Connected Physics. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202104.0350.v1
- Bhattacharjee, D. (2020). Solutions of Kerr Black Holes subject to Naked Singularity and Wormholes. Authorea. https://bit.ly/44pp8oX
- Hawking, S. W. (1978, September 15). Quantum gravity and path integrals. Physical Review D. https://bit.ly/3wEK8c2
- Michel, D. (2014, December 18). Slowing time by stretching the waves in special relativity. Archive Ouverte HAL. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01097004v9
- Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation, and Integration. (n.d.). Google Books. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=ZM7muB8Y35wC
10 November 2022
Understanding Infinity, Zero, and Their Roles in Mathematics and Physics:
Abstract:
This research report delves into the concepts of infinity (∞) and zero (0) and their profound significance in mathematics and physics. Infinity represents an unbounded, limitless quantity, while zero is the absence of quantity. Both concepts are essential in mathematical modeling and the exploration of the physical universe. Additionally, the report explores the concept of negative zero (-0) and negative infinity (-∞) and how they are used in specific contexts.
1. Introduction
Explanation of infinity (∞) as an unbounded concept
Introduction of zero (0) as the absence of quantity
Importance of these concepts in mathematics and physics
2. Infinity (∞)
Mathematical usage of infinity in limits, calculus, and set theory
The extended real number system and arithmetic operations involving infinity
Infinity in the context of transfinite numbers and cardinality
Practical applications in physics, including singularities and cosmology
3. Zero (0)
Zero as the additive identity and its role in arithmetic
Use of zero as a placeholder in the decimal number system
Zero as a starting point for counting and its presence in coordinate systems.
Significance of zero in algebraic structures
4. Negative Zero (-0)
Explanation of negative zero as a value slightly less than zero
Use of negative zero in numerical calculations and computer science
How negative zero interacts with arithmetic operations
Relevance of negative zero in ensuring consistency in mathematical operations
5. Negative Infinity (-∞)
Definition of negative infinity as values infinitely small or unbounded in the negative direction
Use of negative infinity in limits and calculus
Representation of negative infinity in graphical contexts
Arithmetic operations involving negative infinity
6. Existence and Philosophical Views
Discussion of the existence of zero and infinity as abstract concepts
Philosophical interpretations and debates regarding these concepts
Theological, existential, and mystic perspectives on infinity
Anti-dialectical philosophers' critical views on infinity
7. Conclusion
Recapitulation of the importance of infinity and zero in mathematics and physics
Acknowledgment of their abstract and foundational nature
Consideration of the ongoing philosophical and scientific discussions surrounding these concepts
8. References
This research report provides a comprehensive understanding of infinity, zero, and their roles in mathematics and physics, offering insights into their abstract nature, practical applications, and philosophical interpretations.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Addendum
Infinity (∞):
Infinity is not a real number but rather a concept used to describe something that goes on without bound or limit. It represents an unbounded, limitless quantity.
In calculus, infinity is often used to represent limits. For example, the limit of a function f(x) as x approaches infinity can be written as lim(x → ∞) f(x). This indicates that as x becomes larger and larger without bound, f(x) also becomes larger without bound.
There are different types of infinity in mathematics, such as countable infinity (as in the set of all natural numbers) and uncountable infinity (as in the real numbers).
Zero (0):
Zero is a real number and is represented by the digit "0." It is the additive identity, meaning that when you add zero to any number, it does not change the value of that number. For example, 5 + 0 = 5
In the context of arithmetic and algebra, zero serves as the point on the number line where no quantity or magnitude exists.
Zero is also used to denote the absence of a quantity. For example, if you have zero apples, it means you have no apples.
In mathematics, zero is crucial for various operations, including addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. It is the starting point for counting and forms the basis for our number system.
These definitions are foundational in mathematics and are used to perform a wide range of mathematical operations and calculations. Zero and infinity have unique properties and are essential concepts in various mathematical theories and applications.
Negative zero (-0) is a concept in mathematics that represents a value that is less than zero but very close to it, almost indistinguishable from zero. It is often used in certain numerical calculations and computer science to account for rounding and precision issues. Negative zero is not a separate number like positive zero (0); rather, it is a notation used to indicate a value that is very slightly below zero.
Here are some key points about negative zero:
Representation: In mathematical notation, negative zero is typically written as -0.
Significance: Negative zero is used to indicate that a value is very close to zero but slightly less than it. It arises in situations where calculations or measurements result in values that are extremely small but still distinguishable from zero when considering the precision of the measurement or calculation.
Real-World Examples: Negative zero is often encountered in computer programming and numerical analysis. For example, in floating-point arithmetic, when the result of a calculation is extremely close to zero but not exactly zero due to rounding errors, it may be represented as negative zero to indicate its proximity to the negative side of the number line.
Arithmetic Operations: Negative zero behaves like zero in most arithmetic operations. For example, -0 + 0 = 0, -0 - 0 = 0, -0 * 5 = 0, and so on It is essentially treated as a special case of zero.
Practical Use: While negative zero has mathematical utility in specific contexts, it is not commonly encountered in everyday mathematics. In many cases, it is used to ensure that certain mathematical operations and algorithms behave consistently in the presence of very small values that approach zero.
IEEE 754 Standard: In computer science and floating-point arithmetic, the IEEE 754 standard for representing real numbers includes a signed zero representation, which allows for both positive and negative zero. This is particularly useful in ensuring that mathematical operations involving zero behave predictably in various numerical computations.
In summary, negative zero is a mathematical notation used to represent values that are very close to zero but slightly less than zero. It is mainly encountered in computer science and numerical analysis to address precision and rounding issues, ensuring consistent behavior in mathematical operations involving small values.
Negative infinity (-∞) is a mathematical concept used to represent values that are infinitely small or unbounded in the negative direction on the number line. It is the counterpart of positive infinity (∞), which represents values that are infinitely large or unbounded in the positive direction.
Here are some key points about the concept of negative infinity:
Symbol: Negative infinity is typically denoted as -∞.
Mathematical Usage: Negative infinity is used in various mathematical contexts, especially in limits and calculus. For example, when discussing the behavior of a function as it approaches negative infinity, you might write lim f(x) as x approaches -∞.
Representation: In graphical representations, the negative infinity symbol (-∞) is used to indicate that a function or a value continues indefinitely in the negative direction, approaching smaller and smaller negative values without bound.
Arithmetic Operations: Negative infinity interacts with arithmetic operations in a specific way. For example:
Negative infinity minus a finite number: -∞ - a = -∞ (It remains at negative infinity).
Negative infinity plus a finite number: -∞ + a = -∞ (It remains at negative infinity).
Negative infinity times a finite number: -∞ * a = ∞ if a < 0 (It becomes positive infinity) and -∞ * a = -∞ if a > 0 (It remains at negative infinity).
Negative infinity divided by a finite number: -∞ / a = ∞ if a < 0 (It becomes positive infinity) and -∞ / a = -∞ if a > 0 (It remains at negative infinity).
Limit Notation: Negative infinity is often used in the context of limits to describe how a function behaves as its input approaches negative infinity. For example, lim f(x) as x approaches -∞ represents the limit of the function f(x) as x gets smaller and smaller in the negative direction.
Real-World Analogies: While negative infinity is a useful mathematical concept, it doesn't have a direct real-world counterpart. It's a way of describing values that are becoming increasingly negative without bound.
In summary, negative infinity is a mathematical concept representing values that are infinitely small or unbounded in the negative direction on the number line. It is a fundamental element in calculus, limits, and mathematical analysis, helping to describe how functions behave as they approach infinitely negative values.
Existence of Zero (0):
The existence of zero as a mathematical concept is well-established and widely accepted in mathematics. Zero represents the absence of quantity or a neutral element in various mathematical operations. It is a fundamental part of the decimal number system and is used in arithmetic, algebra, calculus, and many other mathematical disciplines.
In the context of philosophy and mathematics, zero can be considered as an abstract concept that represents the absence of value or quantity. It is not a physical object but a mathematical idea used to describe the absence of something.
Existence of Infinity (∞):
The concept of infinity (∞) is more abstract and complex. In mathematics, infinity is used to describe something that is unbounded or limitless. It is not a specific number but a symbol that represents an idea of going on forever without an endpoint. For example, the set of natural numbers (1, 2, 3 ...) is considered to be infinite.
In calculus and mathematical analysis, limits involving infinity are used to describe the behavior of functions as they approach infinitely large or small values. However, infinity is not a real number, and mathematical operations involving infinity must be carefully defined to avoid paradoxes.
From a philosophical perspective, the existence of infinity has been a topic of debate. Some philosophers argue that infinity is an abstract concept that exists only in human thought and mathematics, while others contend that it reflects the potentially unbounded nature of the universe.
In summary, zero is a well-established mathematical concept used to represent the absence of value, while infinity is a more abstract idea used to describe unboundedness or limitless quantities. Both concepts exist within the framework of mathematics and human thought, but their ontological status in the physical world is a matter of philosophical discussion and interpretation.
Infinity (∞):
Unboundedness: Infinity represents the concept of being unbounded or limitless. It is not a specific number but rather a symbol used to describe something that goes on forever without an endpoint.
Limit Notation: In calculus and mathematical analysis, infinity is often used in limit notation. For example, the limit as variable approaches infinity (lim x → ∞) is used to describe how a function behaves as it approaches an infinitely large value of x.
Infinite Sets: In set theory, there are different sizes of infinity. For example, the set of natural numbers (1, 2, 3 ...) is countably infinite, while the set of real numbers is unaccountably infinite. These distinctions are made using concepts like cardinality.
Geometric Infinity: In geometry, infinity can be used to describe points at an infinite distance, such as the vanishing point in perspective drawing or points on the projective plane.
Zero (0):
Additive Identity: Zero is a real number and serves as the additive identity. When you add zero to any number, it does not change the value of that number. For example, 5 + 0 = 5
Place Value: Zero is a crucial digit in the decimal number system. It is used as a placeholder to denote the absence of a value in a particular place. For instance, in the number 205, zero is used to indicate that there are no tens between the two and the five.
Arithmetic Operations: Zero plays a fundamental role in arithmetic operations. It is the starting point for counting, and various mathematical operations involving zero are defined, such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
Origin in Coordinate Systems: In coordinate geometry, zero represents the origin (0, 0) of a Cartesian plane. It is the point where the x and y axes intersects.
Neutral Element: In algebraic structures like groups and rings, zero often serves as the neutral element for addition, meaning that adding zero to any element leaves that element unchanged.
Both infinity and zero are abstract concepts that have practical implications in mathematics and the sciences. They are used to describe extremes, limits, and the absence of values, making them indispensable tools for mathematical modeling and problem-solving.
Infinity (∞):
Infinity represents a concept of boundlessness or an unbounded quantity. It is not a specific number but rather a symbol used to describe something that goes on endlessly.
In mathematics, infinity is used to describe values or limits that become larger without bound. For example, the limit of 1/x as x approaches zero is often represented as ∞ because as x gets closer to zero, 1/x becomes larger and larger.
Infinity can also be used to describe infinite sets, such as the set of all natural numbers (1, 2, 3 ...), which has no end.
Infinity is an abstract concept and is not a real number that can be used in calculations like other finite numbers.
Zero (0):
Zero represents the absence or lack of quantity. It is the point on the number line where no magnitude or value exists.
In mathematics, zero is a real number and a fundamental part of arithmetic. It serves as an additive identity, meaning that when you add zero to any number, it does not change the value of that number. For example, 5 + 0 = 5
Zero also plays a crucial role in algebra, calculus, and many other branches of mathematics.
In philosophy and other fields, zero can symbolize emptiness, nothingness, or the starting point of existence.
Infinity and zero are often discussed in philosophical and mathematical contexts to explore the boundaries of what can be comprehended and calculated. They are fundamental concepts that have sparked numerous debates and inquiries throughout history.
Infinity as a Divine Attribute: In many theological traditions, God is considered infinite. This means that God is not limited by time, space, or any other finite qualities. God's infinity is often seen as a fundamental aspect of His nature. This view of infinity is prominent in monotheistic religions like Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
Infinity and Creation: Theological discussions often revolve around the relationship between the infinite God and the finite created world. The act of creation is sometimes seen as God's way of expressing His infinity while allowing for finite existence. The finite world is contingent upon the infinite God.
Infinity and Human Understanding: Many theologians acknowledge that human beings have limited understanding and finite perspectives. In this view, the infinite nature of God is something that transcends human comprehension. Attempts to describe or understand the infinite are seen as limited by human language and thought.
Infinity and Mysticism: In some mystical traditions within various religions, the contemplation of the infinite is a central practice. Mystics seek direct, personal experiences of the divine, often described as encountering the infinite. For example, in Christian mysticism, there is a focus on experiencing the infinite love of God.
Infinity and Religious Symbols: Some religious symbols and concepts are associated with infinity. For example, the ouroboros (a serpent or dragon eating its tail) is a symbol of infinity and is sometimes interpreted in religious contexts as representing cycles of creation and renewal.
Infinity and Cosmology: Theological views may also intersect with cosmological questions about the universe's infinity or finitude. Some theologians engage with scientific discoveries about the cosmos and consider how these findings relate to religious understandings of infinity.
Infinity and Afterlife: In many religious traditions, the afterlife is often depicted as an existence that transcends earthly limitations, sometimes described as eternal or infinite life. The concept of infinity can play a significant role in discussions about the nature of the afterlife.
Infinity and Moral Attributes: In addition to God's infinity, theologians may discuss God's moral attributes, such as infinite love, mercy, or justice. These attributes are understood as extending infinitely, meaning that they are not limited or finite in any way.
It's important to note that theological views on infinity can be highly nuanced and may vary widely within and between religious traditions. Different theologians may emphasize different aspects of infinity in their theological reflections, and theological interpretations can evolve over time in response to changing philosophical and scientific perspectives.
Anti-dialectical philosophers often take a different view of infinity compared to those who embrace dialectical or Hegelian philosophies. While dialectical philosophies, like Hegelianism, see infinity as an essential and dynamic aspect of reality, anti-dialectical philosophies tend to be more critical of this perspective. Here are some ways in which anti-dialectical philosophers might view infinity:
Rejecting Metaphysical Claims: Many anti-dialectical philosophers reject metaphysical claims that involve the concept of infinity They may argue that infinity is an abstract and potentially incoherent concept that doesn't have a place in a rigorous philosophical framework. They might contend that infinity is a human invention that doesn't correspond to any actual state of affairs in the world.
Emphasis on Finitude: Anti-dialectical philosophers often emphasize the importance of finitude and limitations. They argue that the finite and determinate aspects of reality are what can be known and understood, while the infinite remains unknowable and, therefore, irrelevant or misleading. This perspective is sometimes associated with positivist and empiricist philosophies.
Critique of Hegelian Dialectics: Anti-dialectical philosophers frequently critique Hegelian dialectics, which relies on the concept of an evolving and infinite Absolute or World Spirit. They may argue that this idea is overly speculative and lacks empirical grounding. Instead, they might advocate for a more empirical and scientific approach to philosophy.
Concerns about Paradoxes: Some anti-dialectical philosophers raise concerns about paradoxes and contradictions that can arise when dealing with infinity. The concept of infinity can lead to logical and conceptual problems, such as Zeno's paradoxes, which they see as evidence that infinity is problematic and should be treated with caution.
Preference for Empirical Observation: Anti-dialectical philosophers often place a strong emphasis on empirical observation and the scientific method. They argue that philosophical claims about infinity should be grounded in empirical evidence and testable hypotheses rather than abstract metaphysical speculation.
Epistemological Skepticism: Some anti-dialectical philosophers may adopt an epistemological stance that questions our ability to know or make meaningful claims about infinity. They argue that since infinity is beyond the scope of human experience and understanding, it is not a valid subject of philosophical inquiry.
Existentialist Concerns: Existentialist philosophers, who are often critical of systematic philosophies like Hegelianism, may see infinity as an abstract and impersonal concept that lacks the authenticity and concrete existence they seek to address in their philosophies.
It's important to note that anti-dialectical philosophers can have diverse views on infinity, and not all of them reject the concept outright. Some may engage with infinity in limited ways or propose alternative understandings of the concept. Additionally, the specific views of anti-dialectical philosophers can vary widely depending on their philosophical traditions and individual perspectives.
In physics, infinity (∞) is often encountered as a mathematical concept used to describe certain physical phenomena and mathematical limits. Physicists use infinity in various contexts to simplify equations, describe the behavior of physical systems, and understand the universe. Here are some ways in which physicists view and use infinity:
Infinite Energy and Divergent Integrals:
In some physical theories, infinities can arise when trying to calculate quantities like energy. For example, in classical electromagnetism, the electric field of an infinite uniformly charged plane is infinite at the plane's surface. Physicists have developed techniques like renormalization to deal with these infinities and make meaningful predictions.
Gravitational Singularities:
In the theory of general relativity, which describes the gravitational force, there are solutions known as singularities. Black hole singularities, such as the one at the center of a black hole, are often described as having infinite density and curvature.
Infinite Universes and Cosmology:
In cosmology, the study of the universe as a whole, the concept of infinity is encountered in various ways. The universe's size may be infinite (infinite expansion), or it may have a finite size but no boundary (a closed universe). The Big Bang singularity is often described as an infinitely dense and hot state from which the universe expanded.
Infinite Quantum States:
In quantum mechanics, the mathematical formalism involves infinite-dimensional vector spaces. Particles such as electrons are described by wave functions that exist in these infinite-dimensional spaces, allowing them to occupy an infinite number of quantum states.
Limits and Asymptotic Behavior:
In many physical theories, infinity is used in the context of limits and asymptotic behavior. For example, when studying the behavior of a system as it approaches very high energies or very small distances, physicists use the concept of infinity to describe how certain quantities diverge or become very large.
Infinity in Thermodynamics:
In thermodynamics, infinity can be used to describe idealized situations, such as an ideal gas with infinite temperature or an infinite heat reservoir. These idealizations are useful for making predictions and simplifying calculations.
Infinite Expansion of the Universe:
The expansion of the universe is described as an ongoing process, and the concept of an infinite universe is used to explain its expansion over vast distances and timescales.
It's important to note that while physicists use infinity as a mathematical tool to describe physical systems and make predictions, they are also aware that infinities in their equations often signal unresolved issues or limitations in current theories. In many cases, the concept of infinity may be replaced or modified when more advanced theories are developed to describe the fundamental nature of the universe. As such, physicists are continually working to refine their understanding of how infinity fits into the physical world.
Infinity (∞) is a concept in mathematics that represents an unbounded or limitless quantity or value. It is not a specific number but a symbol used to describe something that goes on forever without any finite limit. Infinity is used in various branches of mathematics, including calculus, set theory, and number theory, to represent the idea of an uncountable or unlimited quantity.
Here are some key points and mathematical concepts related to infinity:
Infinity in Calculus:
In calculus, infinity is often used to describe limits. For example, when you take the limit of a function as it approaches a certain value, it may approach infinity if the function grows without bound.
Infinite Series:
Infinite series is a sum of an infinite sequence of numbers. For example, the sum of all positive integers (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ...) is said to be infinite (∞).
Infinity in Set Theory:
In set theory, infinity is used to describe infinite sets. The set of natural numbers (0, 1, 2, 3 ...) is an example of an infinite set.
Extended Real Numbers:
In the extended real number system, infinity is treated as a valid mathematical concept. It is used to represent values that are unbounded in both the positive and negative directions. For example, in this system, you might have positive infinity (+∞), negative infinity (-∞), and arithmetic operations involving infinity.
Limits and Asymptotes:
Infinity is often used to describe limits and asymptotic behavior in mathematics. For instance, in the study of functions, you might encounter vertical asymptotes, which are lines approaching infinity.
Cardinality and Infinite Sets:
Georg Cantor, a mathematician, made significant contributions to the study of infinite sets and their cardinalities. He introduced the concept of different sizes of infinity, such as countable infinity (the size of the set of natural numbers) and uncountable infinity (the size of the real numbers).
Transfinite Numbers:
Transfinite numbers are used in set theory to describe different sizes of infinity. Aleph-null (ℵ₀) represents the cardinality of countable sets, while larger transfinite numbers represent larger infinities.
It's important to note that while infinity is a useful mathematical concept, it's not a real number that can be used in ordinary arithmetic. Instead, it is a symbol representing the idea of limitless or unbounded quantities and is a foundational concept in many areas of mathematics.