13 February 2025

Clarifying the Concepts of Antigravity, Dark Energy, and Negative Apparent Mass in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)


Soumendra Nath Thakur
February 13, 2025

The assertion that "antigravity is an unlikely phenomenon" is inconsistent with established observations. The behaviour of photons provides direct evidence to the contrary. According to its energy, a photon possesses effective mass and is observed to escape gravitational wells, demonstrating a counteracting effect against gravity. Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), a framework built upon classical mechanics principles, provides a clear formulation of this phenomenon. ECM reveals that photons exert an antigravitational force on massive bodies, accelerating at twice the speed of light within gravitational influence. As a photon leaves a gravitational well, it expends energy but retains its inherent energy, continuing to travel at the speed of light in free space. This indicates that antigravitational effects are an intrinsic feature of certain mass-energy interactions, contradicting the claim that antigravity is unlikely.

The notion that "dark energy is not real" is only partially correct. While dark energy is not a physical object with rest mass, its effects are observable. ECM equations establish dark energy as a form of potential energy with a dynamic nature, existing only as a consequence of gravitational and motion dynamics of massive bodies. Rather than being an independent entity, dark energy emerges from the interplay of gravity and motion at cosmic scales, reinforcing its role in large-scale universal dynamics.

Similarly, the claim that "negative mass lacks a physical description and remains unproven" overlooks key insights provided by ECM. Rather than considering negative mass as a standalone entity, ECM introduces the concept of negative apparent mass, which arises from motion and gravitational interactions. This phenomenon does not imply an intrinsic negative mass but rather an emergent property influenced by both baryonic matter and dark matter. ECM principles illustrate how apparent mass contributes to gravitational effects, expanding the understanding of mass-energy interactions beyond conventional classical mechanics.

These refinements in ECM extend classical mechanics while maintaining consistency with empirical observations, providing a structured approach to understanding gravitational repulsion, dark energy, and the role of apparent mass in astrophysical phenomena.

12 February 2025

Consistency in Interpreting Empirical and Abstract Evidence: Avoiding Hasty Judgments.


Soumendra Nath Thakur 

February 12, 2025

The phrase "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" conveys that a lack of evidence does not necessarily mean something does not exist. This statement is generally valid, as it warns against assuming nonexistence solely due to missing evidence.

However, the phrase "is not evidence of absence" oversimplifies the issue. While absence of evidence does not always confirm nonexistence, it can sometimes serve as evidence of absence, depending on the context. The statement challenges flawed reasoning that always equates absence of evidence with nonexistence. However, it does not fully acknowledge that, under certain conditions, absence of evidence can contribute to an argument for nonexistence. Ideally, the statement should emphasize the possibility of presence rather than implying a definite presence or absence.

This phrase functions as a rhetorical counter to hasty judgments. If someone assumes that missing evidence automatically means nonexistence, the phrase offers a clever rebuttal. However, its strength lies in questioning premature conclusions rather than establishing a definitive logical rule.

In mathematics, especially in abstract reasoning, not all conclusions require empirical evidence. Dismissing mathematical constructs simply because they lack direct evidence would be inconsistent, as abstract mathematics is grounded in logical principles rather than empirical validation. While these principles can apply to real-world phenomena, their validity does not depend on physical evidence alone.

The Formulation and Implications of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)


Soumendra Nath Thakur, ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803, 

Tagore’s Electronic Lab, India. 

Communication: postmasterenator@gmail.com

 

February 12, 2025

 

Abstract

 

Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) introduces a modified formulation of classical mechanics by redefining mass as effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ), which incorporates both matter mass (M) and apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ). This approach allows for a broader interpretation of gravitational interactions, particularly in systems where negative effective mass induces repulsive effects. ECM extends Newtonian dynamics by establishing force and energy equations for both massive and massless entities, naturally integrating with quantum mechanical principles. The framework provides a novel explanation for cosmic expansion, where massless particles experience repulsive gravitational effects due to their apparent mass contributions. Additionally, ECM introduces conditions for superluminal motion and refines the concept of the Hubble radius, offering insights into observational horizons and large-scale structure formation. The implications of ECM suggest a fundamental link between gravity, mass-energy equivalence, and large-scale cosmic evolution.

 

Keywords: apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ), effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ), gravitational interactions, cosmic expansion, superluminal motion, Hubble radius, [Apparent Weight] [Dark Energy] [ECM] [Extended Photon Dynamics] [Gravitational Collapse] [Massless-to-Massive] [Photon Phases] [Inertial mass relativistic gravity] [Extended Classical Mechanics] [About]

 

1. Classical Mechanics Framework

 

In traditional mechanics, force is defined as the product of mass and acceleration. The total energy of a system consists of potential and kinetic energy, where potential energy follows an inverse proportionality with distance in gravitational systems, while kinetic energy depends on the squared velocity of the moving object.

 

F = ma

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PE + KE = −GMm/r + 1/2mv²

 

#Mathematical denotation terms are listed alphabetically under 'Mathematical terms used,' with brief descriptions below and apply to all equations in this study.

 

2. ECM Force for Matter Mass

 

ECM modifies Newton’s second law by redefining mass as effective mass Mᵉᶠᶠ. Within the Extended Classical Mechanics framework, force is derived by incorporating both matter mass and apparent mass. The resultant force is expressed in terms of effective mass and acceleration, allowing for a broader interpretation of gravitational interactions, particularly in systems where negative effective mass induces repulsive effects.

 

Fᴇᴄᴍ = (M −Mᵃᵖᵖ)aᵉᶠᶠ

Fᴇᴄᴍ = Mᵉᶠᶠaᵉᶠᶠ, since, (M −Mᵃᵖᵖ) = Mᵉᶠᶠ, M = 0, Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0.

 

This suggests that when effective mass is negative, the force direction may lead to repulsive gravitational effects, impacting large-scale cosmic structures.

 

3. ECM Force for Massless Particles

 

For massless entities such as photons, force is governed by apparent mass contributions, as there is no direct matter mass component. In ECM, this negative effective mass leads to repulsive gravitational interactions, offering a natural explanation for certain cosmic expansion effects.

 

Since the force depends solely on the apparent mass, the equation takes an alternative form when effective mass is negative, reinforcing its connection to observed large-scale repulsive behavior in the universe.

 

Fₚₕₒₜₒₙ = −Mᵃᵖᵖaᵉᶠᶠ , since M = 0

Fₚₕₒₜₒₙ = Mᵉᶠᶠaᵉᶠᶠ ,  since (M −Mᵃᵖᵖ) = Mᵉᶠᶠ, M = 0, Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0.

 

This formulation suggests that, under negative effective mass conditions, repulsive gravitational effects emerge naturally, influencing cosmic expansion and the large-scale distribution of matter.

 

4. ECM Energy-Frequency Relationship for Massless Systems

 

The energy-frequency relation in ECM aligns with the established principles of quantum mechanics, where the effective mass of a massless particle is proportional to its frequency. This correspondence reinforces the compatibility of ECM with existing quantum formulations.

 

Mᵉᶠᶠ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = hf/c² = E/c²

 

5. ECM Kinetic Energy of Apparent Mass

 

The kinetic energy of a system influenced by apparent mass follows a modified classical approach. Instead of a strictly positive mass contribution, apparent mass is taken into account with its sign reversed, modifying the total kinetic energy expression. This approach provides a framework for analyzing phenomena where negative mass effects play a significant role.

 

KEₚₕₒₜₒₙ = 1/2(−Mᵃᵖᵖ)·c².

 

Here, apparent mass Mᵃᵖᵖ is considered in the kinetic energy equation.

 

6. ECM Energy for Matter Mass Systems

 

Total energy in ECM consists of potential and kinetic components, with potential energy derived from the effective mass terms. The interaction of matter mass and apparent mass defines the energy distribution, ensuring consistency with classical interpretations while extending the framework to incorporate novel effects. Under the influence of ECM force, kinetic energy contributions arise from apparent mass components.

 

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴇᴄᴍ + KEᴇᴄᴍ

M PEᴇᴄᴍ, −Mᵃᵖᵖ KEᴇᴄᴍ, when ECM force is active                                               

 

7. ECM Energy Formulation for Massless and Effective Mass Systems

 

In ECM, the total energy of a system—including massless entities—retains contributions from both potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE). The potential energy follows an effective mass formulation, while kinetic energy depends on relative velocity conditions.

 

• When effective mass is positive, motion remains subluminal (v ≤ c).

• When effective mass is negative, velocities exceeding c become possible. However, in this case, the superluminal velocity should be interpreted as an emergent property of the effective energy framework, rather than a direct physical motion of particles exceeding c.

 

Total Energy Equations:

 

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴇᴄᴍ + KEᴇᴄᴍ = {−G(M −Mᵃᵖᵖ)(m−mᵃᵖᵖ)/r )} + 1/2(m−mᵃᵖᵖ)v²;

v ≤ c when M ≥−Mᵃᵖᵖ, but v ≥ c when M ≤ −Mᵃᵖᵖ .

 

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴇᴄᴍ + KEᴇᴄᴍ = (−GMᵉᶠᶠmᵉᶠᶠ/r ) + 1/2mᵉᶠᶠ

v ≤ c when Mᵉᶠᶠ > 0, but v ≥ c when Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0

 

Eₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = 1/2(−mᵃᵖᵖ)v²; v = c.

 

8. Dual Representation of Effective Mass

 

ECM introduces a dual representation of effective mass, distinguishing between larger system mass contributions and localized test particle effects. This distinction is analogous to classical gravitational potential energy equations, where mass terms represent both global and local contributions.

 

Mᵉᶠᶠ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = hf/c² = E/c²

mᵉᶠᶠ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = hf/c² = E/c²

 

The notations serve a similar dual-mass representation:

Mᵉᶠᶠ refers to the effective mass of the larger system (analogous to M in gravitational potential energy).

 

9. Kinetic Energy Representation of Apparent Mass in ECM - Massless Case):

 

In the ECM framework, the kinetic energy of an apparent mass in a massless system adheres to the energy-frequency relation. The apparent mass is expressed in terms of energy and frequency, maintaining consistency with quantum mechanics. This formulation aligns with the mass-energy equivalence principle, reinforcing the role of induced mass-like effects in ECM.

 

The equation:

 

−Mᵃᵖᵖ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = hf/c² = E/c²

 

This describes the apparent mass associated with massless entities like photons, and follows from the mass-energy equivalence principle.

 

10. Total Effective Mass with Gravitational Contributions

 

The total effective mass in ECM includes contributions from gravitational energy. This formulation incorporates frequency-dependent terms, where Δf represents a gravitationally induced frequency shift due to energy contributions from gravitational fields. The presence of this additional frequency shift component extends the effective mass concept beyond conventional mass-energy equivalence principles.

 

Mᵉᶠᶠ,ₜₒₜₐₗ = Mᵉᶠᶠ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ + Eg/c² = hf/c² + hΔf/c²

 

This equation represents the total effective mass in ECM, which includes contributions from:

 

• The mass-energy equivalence of a massless particle (e.g., a photon) with frequency f.

• An additional gravitational energy term associated with the frequency shift Δf, which arises due to gravitational interactions.

 

11. Implications of Superluminal Velocities & Hubble Radius in ECM  

 

In Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), negative effective mass can induce anti-gravitational effects at extreme cosmic distances. This contributes to accelerated cosmic expansion and influences large-scale structure dynamics. The observational limit beyond the Hubble radius arises due to recession velocities surpassing the speed of light, preventing information retrieval from beyond this boundary.

 

For v = c = 3 × 10⁸ m/s, the Hubble radius is given by:

 

d = v/H₀ = (3 × 10⁸ m s¹) / (2.268 × 10¹⁸ s¹) = 1.32 × 10²⁶ m

 

Converting to light-years:

 

d = 1.32 × 10²⁶ m × (1 light-year/9.461 × 10¹⁵ m) = 13.93 billion light-years

 

At this proper distance, known as the Hubble radius, the recession velocity reaches the speed of light. Beyond this threshold, galaxies move at superluminal speeds, making them observationally inaccessible.

 

This ECM interpretation provides a structured perspective on observational horizons, emphasizing the role of effective mass variations in shaping cosmic expansion and defining observational limits imposed by superluminal recession.

 

12. Variation of Apparent Mass Across Local and Intergalactic Scales in ECM

 

In Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ) plays a critical role in determining the effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) and, consequently, gravitational interactions. The influence of apparent mass varies significantly across different cosmic scales:

 

Local, Planetary, and Stellar Scales: The high density of ordinary matter results in dominant gravitational effects, leading to minimal changes in apparent mass. Dark matter’s contribution to gravitational interactions is negligible at these scales.

 

Galactic Scale: Dark matter dominates mass distribution, comprising ~85% of a galaxy’s total mass. As a result, its gravitational influence exceeds that of normal matter, leading to a stronger reduction in apparent mass and an overall increase in the strength of gravitating mass (Mɢ).

 

Intergalactic Scale: The effect of dark matter on apparent mass becomes even more pronounced, with its gravitational influence intensifying over vast cosmic distances. This drives large-scale structure formation and influences the expansion dynamics of galaxy clusters.

 

These variations in apparent mass across scales highlight how gravitational interactions are governed by effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) = M − Mᵃᵖᵖ, where an increase in gravitational strength results in a corresponding increase in negative apparent mass, further lowering effective mass.

 

Reference Papers:

 

1.                  Chernin, A. D., Бисноватый-коган, Г. С., Teerikorpi, P., Valtonen, M. J., Byrd, G. G., & Merafina, M. (2013a). Dark energy and the structure of the Coma cluster of galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 553, A101. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220781

 

2.                  Thakur, S. N., Understanding Photon Interactions: Source Gravitational Wells vs. External Fields. (2024). ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14433.48487

 

3.                  Thakur, S. N., & Bhattacharjee, D. (2023b). Phase shift and infinitesimal wave energy loss equations. Journal of Physical Chemistry & Biophysics, 13(6), JPCB-23-27248 (R). https://www.longdom.org/open-access/phase-shift-and-infinitesimal-wave-energy-loss-equations-104719.html

 

4.                  Thakur, S. N. (2023). Photon paths bend due to momentum exchange, not intrinsic spacetime curvature. Definitions. https://doi.org/10.32388/81iiae

 

5.                  Thakur, S. N. (2023). The dynamics of photon momentum exchange and curvature in gravitational fields. Definitions. https://doi.org/10.32388/r625zn

 

6.                  Thakur, S. N. (2023). Redshift and its Equations in Electromagnetic Waves. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33004.54403

 

7.                  Thakur, S. N. (2023). Cosmic Speed beyond Light: Gravitational and Cosmic Redshift. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36400.94721

 

8.                  Thakur, S. N., Bhattacharjee, D., & Frederick, O. (2023). Photon Interactions in Gravity and Antigravity: Conservation, Dark Energy, and Redshift Effects. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.2086.v1

 

*-*-*-*-*

About the Formulation and Implications of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)

 

Soumendra Nath Thakur's work on Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) offers a comprehensive and nuanced exploration of how classical mechanics can be extended to encompass phenomena typically associated with quantum mechanics and cosmology. Here’s a brief comment on the key points and implications of ECM:

 

1. Classical Mechanics Framework

Thakur begins by grounding ECM in traditional mechanics, where force is defined as the product of mass and acceleration, and total energy consists of potential and kinetic components. This foundational understanding is crucial for extending classical mechanics to more complex systems.

2. ECM Force for Matter Mass

ECM modifies Newton’s second law by introducing the concept of effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ), which combines matter mass (M) and apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ). This modification allows for a broader interpretation of gravitational interactions, particularly in systems where negative effective mass induces repulsive effects. This is a significant departure from traditional mechanics and opens up new avenues for understanding gravitational dynamics.

3. ECM Force for Massless Particles

For massless entities like photons, ECM posits that force is governed by apparent mass contributions. This leads to repulsive gravitational interactions, offering a natural explanation for cosmic expansion effects. This formulation suggests that negative effective mass conditions can lead to repulsive gravitational effects, influencing cosmic expansion and the large-scale distribution of matter.

4. ECM Energy-Frequency Relationship for Massless Systems

The energy-frequency relation in ECM aligns with quantum mechanics, where the effective mass of a massless particle is proportional to its frequency. This correspondence reinforces the compatibility of ECM with existing quantum formulations, bridging classical and quantum mechanics.

5. ECM Kinetic Energy of Apparent Mass

The kinetic energy of a system influenced by apparent mass follows a modified classical approach. This approach accounts for negative mass effects, modifying the total kinetic energy expression. This framework is essential for analyzing phenomena where negative mass effects play a significant role.

6. ECM Energy for Matter Mass Systems

Total energy in ECM consists of potential and kinetic components, with potential energy derived from effective mass terms. The interaction of matter mass and apparent mass defines the energy distribution, ensuring consistency with classical interpretations while extending the framework to incorporate novel effects.

7. ECM Energy Formulation for Massless and Effective Mass Systems

ECM introduces a dual representation of effective mass, distinguishing between larger system mass contributions and localized test particle effects. This distinction is crucial for understanding how gravitational interactions are governed by effective mass across different scales.

8. Implications of Superluminal Velocities & Hubble Radius in ECM

ECM suggests that negative effective mass can induce anti-gravitational effects at extreme cosmic distances, contributing to accelerated cosmic expansion. This interpretation provides a structured perspective on observational horizons, emphasizing the role of effective mass variations in shaping cosmic expansion and defining observational limits imposed by superluminal recession.

9. Variation of Apparent Mass Across Local and Intergalactic Scales in ECM

ECM highlights how the influence of apparent mass varies significantly across different cosmic scales. At local, planetary, and stellar scales, gravitational effects are dominated by ordinary matter. At galactic and intergalactic scales, dark matter's gravitational influence becomes more pronounced, driving large-scale structure formation and influencing the expansion dynamics of galaxy clusters.

Conclusion

Soumendra Nath Thakur's work on ECM offers a detailed and nuanced understanding of gravitational interactions across quantum and cosmological scales. By introducing the concepts of effective mass and apparent mass, ECM provides a unified framework that bridges classical mechanics, quantum principles, and cosmological phenomena. This approach not only aligns with fundamental principles but also offers potential explanations for cosmic-scale phenomena involving dark matter, dark energy, and exotic gravitational effects. Thakur's work encourages further exploration and refinement of ECM in various physical


11 February 2025

Clarifying ECM's Stance on Negative Mass and Dark Matter Interactions:

February 11, 2025                                                 RG Discussion Link

Dear Mr. Ian Clague,

Thank you for your response and for referencing J. S. Farnes’ "A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter." However, your comment appears to operate under assumptions that do not align with the framework and specific content of ECM as presented in this discussion.

  1. Irrelevance of External Assertions
    Your comment does not directly address or engage with the ECM framework outlined in this discussion but instead refers to an external model, suggesting an alternative premise without evaluating ECM’s treatment of the subject matter. While referencing other works can be useful in comparative discussions, an assertion such as “Negative mass can explain Dark Matter” without any engagement with the ECM-specific perspective does not constitute a meaningful counterpoint.

  2. Misalignment with ECM's Dark Matter Interpretation
    Your statement that "Negative mass can explain Dark Matter as the interaction of negative mass with positive mass" does not apply to ECM, which treats dark matter as possessing positive effective mass. ECM presents dark matter as a contributing component to the total positive matter mass of a system, alongside baryonic matter. The claim that dark matter must be explained via negative mass is inconsistent with ECM’s construct, which does not require negative mass to account for dark matter effects.

  3. ECM’s Treatment of Negative Mass vs. Your Assertion
    In ECM, negative apparent mass (−Mᵃᵖᵖ) arises as a motion-dependent or gravitationally induced property, rather than as an intrinsic mass entity. The framework does not support the notion of self-existing, freely interacting negative mass, as assumed in your reference. This distinction is critical because ECM does not describe dark matter in terms of negative mass, contrary to your assertion that "Negative mass can explain Dark Matter."

  4. ECM’s Explanation of Dark Energy vs. Your Interpretation
    Your assertion that "Dark Energy [is] the interaction of negative mass and negative mass" contradicts ECM’s position. ECM interprets dark energy as possessing negative effective mass that interacts with the total positive effective mass of ordinary and dark matter. In ECM, dark energy does not arise from negative mass interacting with itself but rather from its interaction with an overall positive matter mass distribution.

Conclusion

Your statements regarding negative mass as the explanation for dark matter and dark energy do not align with ECM’s theoretical structure. The presentation of ECM explicitly defines dark matter as a positive-mass entity and describes dark energy as having a negative effective mass interacting with positive effective mass—not through the interaction of two negative masses, as you claim.

While alternative models, such as Farnes’ theory, exist, an assertion that they necessarily override ECM’s conclusions would require a rigorous comparative analysis rather than an unqualified statement. As such, your assertions are not consistent with ECM’s framework, nor do they provide a valid refutation of its premises.

Best regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur

My Answers on the Questions about ECM: Dark Energy and Gravitational Potential Energy in ECM.

 RG Discussion Link Here:

February 11, 2025

Dear Mohammad Shafiq Khan,

Thank you for your engagement in the discussion on Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM). I appreciate your thought-provoking questions, and I fully agree that questioning everything is the essence of scientific progress. However, as I am actively engaged in multiple aspects of my research, some responses may take time, as I prefer to provide well-founded answers rather than instant ones.

1. Gravitational Potential Energy in ECM

Within ECM, the gravitational potential energy for a test matter mass mₘ is expressed as:

Uᴇᴄᴍ = − GMᵉᶠᶠmₘ/r 

where: 

• Uᴇᴄᴍ: is the gravitational potential energy of the test mass mₘ
• G: is the gravitational constant
• Mᵉᶠᶠ: is the effective mass of the source
• mₘ: is a test matter mass of the source
• r: is the radial distance

The effective mass Mᵉᶠᶠ accounts for both baryonic matter and the apparent mass contribution, which extends the classical framework to accommodate additional effects such as dark matter and dark energy.

2. Dark Energy in ECM

Dark energy is treated in ECM through the concept of apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ), leading to an effective mass representation:

Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ) = Mɢ

where:

• Mɢ: Gravitating Mass
• Mᴍ: Matter Mass
• −Mᵃᵖᵖ: represents the influence of dark energy (with a negative contribution).

This formulation aligns with the work of A.D. Chernin et al., where the dark energy effective mass (Mᴅᴇ) is included as a component influencing the dynamics of large-scale structures. When the apparent mass dominates, the effective mass can become negative, corresponding to the repulsive effect of dark energy.

3. The Nature of Dark Energy Before the Big Bang

Before the Big Bang, the concept of gravitational potential and dark energy as we understand them today may not have existed in the same manner. In ECM, potential energy requires the presence of mass-energy interactions, space, and time—all of which were non-existent before the Big Bang event. Thus, dark energy, in its present form, would not have existed as an independent entity.

For further insights into the conceptual foundations of existence, space, time, and energy, I recommend reviewing the following resources:

A Clear Understanding of Existence, Event, Time, and Space in Relation to Matter and Energy https://www.researchgate.net/post/A_Clear_Understanding_of_Existence_Event_Time_and_Space_in_Relation_to_Matter_and_Energy
The Nexus of Existence and Events https://www.researchgate.net/post/The_Nexus_of_Existence_and_Events
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (Wikipedia) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis

I appreciate your thought-provoking contributions and look forward to further discussions that challenge and refine our understanding of fundamental physics.

Best regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur