Synchronization of atomic clocks:

As per SI unit of time, it's frequency that represents time. (The unit of time is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the cesium frequency to be 9192631770 Hz.)

Atomic clocks are automatically synchronized to a radio signal that is continuously broadcast by the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the United States.

Atomic clocks are also subject to various external influences, including gravity.

Atomic clocks are used onboard GPS satellites orbiting the Earth, but must send updates twice daily to correct the clock's natural drift.

However, although the method is a simple correction of clock frequency depending on distance from Earth and other factors, the method is still inappropriate, as it is based on time distortion when it should be wavelength distortion.

It is the phase shift in the frequency due to the infinitisimal loss of wave energy under the relativistic effect on the clock mechanism, and other distortions.

#synchronization #atomicclock #waveenergy #phaseshift #timesynchronisation

Lorentz transformation cannot establish the geometry of space and time covariant, except in the covariable contents within the invariants space and time:

Lorentz transformation cannot establish the geometry (dimensions) of space and time covariant, except in the covariable contents (existential events) within the invariant dimension of space and time, or so called, spacetime. The geometry of frame of reference and its content are not the same. 

As for example, at Planck threshold, geometry of Euclidean space vibrates, reasoning limit in our perception. 

To falsify relativistic spacetime, if any, why should one has to encounter Lorentz's abstract mathematical presentation than encountering relativistic spacetime directly? 

So irrespective of what Lorentz transformation conveys, the author of relativity did not physically established Lorentz, before he robbed of the independence of time and married off space and time after making them illegally "natural" without providing a single experiment to support this. 

His paper, specifically relevant to the time dilation and spacetime should have been rejected by the reviewer of the paper then. As the author of relativity cannot simply present an illegal mathematical presentation and get his paper published for others to prove his paper through experiments. 

The author of relativity claimed full credit for his paper in Relativity and remained protected by others as he let others to face the questions arising out of his papers, to Lorentz and the experimenters who confirmed time dilation, biased. The author of relativity should not escape in facing the questions relevant and it's consequences.  

All of the experiments with time dilation were biased and invalid as they don't follow the mathematical or scientific norms to hold that the wavelength distortions corresponding error in clock oscillation resulting erroneous time being erroneously presented as time dilation by the author concerned, 

When it's obvious that none can get whatever time is, if there is erroneous clock oscillation, or no oscillation at all.

We know, as per SI unit of time, it's frequency that represents time. So before considering Relativistic effects on frequency, or it's wavelength, we canot directly jump on to the relativistic effects on time, because a clock time is always as per the order of time,  representation of frequency, resulting oscillations, and subjects to various distortions too.

I have my paper invalidating time dilation as referred below.

Lorents transformation or relativistic spacetime cannot establish covariant spacetime, ash they are invariants indeed.

Reference Relativistic effects on phase shift on frequencies invalidate time dilation II

Black hole - hints of invariable space and time:

A black hole is not only a region of space with an intense gravitational field, where all fundamental interactions unified as "intense gravity", since events apparently stop in the black hole.

However, space and time become meaningless in non-eventual existence, so I have valid reasons to accept that distortion of spacetime cannot occur in their own absence.

Here, there can be no general gravity except "strong gravity," - general gravity; which we know from general relativity, where spacetime is covariant.

The space of the eventual universe is not the space of non-eventual black hole, irrespective of any effects of black hole is noticeable in universal space.

However, the realisation of the statement implies the invariant parameters of both space and time.

#blackhole #Intensegravity #noneventualstate #invariantspace #invarianttime

Arguments referring atomic clock supports time dilation is error, not dilated time:

It's interesting to find that Einstein published his paper on special relativity in 1905 and someone submitted that atomic clocks support time dilation, funny.

When the atomic clock was invented in 1945, how could a paper in 1905 rely on an atomic clock experiment discovered in 1945? Did the author use a time machine?

Listen, the practice is that when someone submits a scientific theory, even in applied science, the author himself has to show valid experimental results to support a claim, such as time dilation.

Obviously the author of Special Relativity never provided valid experimental results in support of time dilation. So author essentially failed to claim time dilation in his paper because he did not provide valid experimental results supporting time dilation when he submitted his paper on special relativity.

So I wonder, how did time dilation come about in the 1905 publication of spatial relativity without a supporting test for time dilation?

Also, the mathematical representation of time dilation that the author gave is bad, for physical gravitational effects or even speed dilating time (which is a mathematical parameter). Physical influences cannot modify conceptual time. Men do not marry a ghost wife!

However, the most interesting fact about the atomic clock mentioned is that it defines the frequency of specific atom representing unit of time in the SI system, and is therefore frequency, not speed or gravitational potential difference, corresponding time.

This means that Relativistic speed  or gravitational potential differences cannot represent time and so nor its dilation, unless they are considered as external influences that can cause distortions of time. Also other effects such as temperature variations or mechanical misalignment of clocks etc.

Neither of these effects causes time dilation but causes errors in the clock oscillation, resulting in timing errors.

This is exactly what my paper showed how time dilation is illegal.

Therefore, the atomic clock is the correct example to represent what is time and what is dominant error, but not time dilation. Time is not something to stretch.

Reference Relativistic effects on phase shift on frequencies invalidate time dilation Ii

Difference between conjectural relativistic time dilation and general wave distortion in clock oscillation:

Whether time dilation is wrong or right, but for the sake of argument here, I will consider the proposition of time dilation in terms of relativistic effects, i.e. speed or gravitational potential differences.

The orbital speed of a GPS satellite is not the relative speed with respect to the Earth. It is the angular velocity of a GPS satellite relative to the center of the Earth and is measured in degrees or radians. Angular velocity is the time rate at which an object rotates about an axis, or the angular displacement between two bodies changes.

The orbital speed of a satellite is not a consideration in relativistic time dilation involving relative motion, and angular velocity does not apply to time dilation because it considers either relative motion or gravitational potential difference. In relativistic time dilation, a moving object with respect to an observer on Earth requires a relative motion.

The time dilation equation 𝑡՚ = 𝑡/√(1− 𝑣²/𝑐²) applies to the relative motion of an object moving relative to an observer on Earth.

GPS satellites orbit about 20,000 km from Earth and are affected by relativistic effects due to the gravitational potential difference between the Earth observer and the satellite. Therefore, there is a relative gravitational potential difference between the GPS satellite and the observer on Earth.

The gravitational potential difference is greater with a GPS satellite in space than with an observer on Earth, so that the gravitational force is greater with an observer on Earth than with a GPS satellite in space. Due to the weakening of gravity, satellite clocks run about 45 microseconds a day faster than Earth clocks. Therefore, on balance, the clocks of GPS satellites in space run about 38 microseconds a day faster than the clocks of GPS receivers on Earth. This is called gravitational time dilation. Whereas, the angular speed of GPS satellites, in degrees, is not calculated in gravitational time dilation.

The gravitational time dilation equation is different from the time dilation equation due to motion. The gravitational time dilation of a GPS satellite or any other gravitational time dilation equation includes the gravitational constant (G) and the distance between the centers of objects (r), where G = 6.67×10¯¹¹ Nm²/kg², the gravitational time dilation equation is, T' = T/√1−2GM/rc², where (T') is the time interval affected by (Earth) gravity; (t) is the time interval (GPS satellite) unaffected by gravity; (M) is the mass of the Earth, (G) is the gravitational constant, (r) is the distance between the centers of objects and (c) is the speed of light (299792458m/s).

However, according to my scientific findings and experiments, my paper concern deals with relativistic covariant spacetime invalidating covariant time dilation and space. Since, time and space have no physical properties but they are only mathematical parameters, time cannot be expanded, and my experiments confirm that the loss of energy due to relativistic effects enlarges the wavelength of the clock's oscillation, which corresponds to incorrect time but relativity appears incorrectly. This error as time expands. Time dilation is actually an error in timing due to wavelength distortion.

The time interval T(deg) is inversely proportional to the frequency, for a 1° phase, we get a wave associated with time change. 1° phase shift = 𝑇/360 = (1/𝑓)/360. Time delay for 1° phase shift with frequency of 5 MHz and wavelength of 59.95 m,

𝛥𝑡 = 555 𝑝𝑠.

The GPS satellite's cesium-133 atomic clock orbits at an altitude of 20,000 km with a time delay of 38 microseconds per day.

Time delay for a 1455.5° phase shift or 4.04 Hz. With a frequency of 9192631770 Hz,

𝛥𝑡 = 0.00000010878 m𝑠. So 38 microseconds per day.

Reference: Relativistic effects on phase shift in relative frequencies invalidate time dilation.