The Socratic method or critical thinking known as Socratic questioning. This approach involves a conversation between individuals in which a proposition or idea is examined through a series of questions and answers to deepen understanding or reveal contradictions and flaws in the argument.
In the context of peer review, this method can be applied to verify a proposition or theory. Peers or reviewers may question the reasoning, assumptions, and implications of the proposal. By trying to reveal absurdities or contradictions, reviewers aim to uncover weaknesses in an argument or theory. If the proposal withstands this rigorous test without falling prey to contradictions or logical fallacies, it is considered more credible and worthy of consideration.
This approach encourages critical thinking and thorough examination of ideas, promoting deeper understanding and refinement by rigorously scrutinizing ideas. This can be a useful way to assess the strength and validity of propositions in academic or intellectual settings.
No comments:
Post a Comment