Irrational Restatement of the Cosmological Constant:

The cosmological constant, initially introduced to maintain a static universe, was abandoned by Einstein when it became clear that the universe was not static but expanding. The concept for the expanding nature of the universe was not reintroduced or re-entered into his equation; rather, it fell out of favour after the expanding universe was confirmed by observational evidence.

So, while Einstein introduced the cosmological constant before Hubble's confirmation of an expanding universe, he eventually abandoned it in favour of a model consistent with cosmic expansion.

The main purpose of the cosmological constant was to maintain a constant universe by preventing gravitational collapse, specifically not accounting for an expanding universe. Einstein's motivation was to propose a term in his equation that would prevent the collapse of space under the influence of gravity.

Therefore, since, the main purpose of the cosmological constant was to maintain a constant universe by preventing gravitational collapse, specifically without accounting for an expanding universe. Einstein's motivation was to propose a term in his equation that would prevent the collapse of space under the influence of gravity. He eventually abandoned it in favour of a model consistent with cosmic expansion. And so, re-introducing the cosmological constant into modern cosmology with an irrational bias is not logically accepted by the explanation of science.

And so, my view emphasizes the main purpose behind Einstein's introduction of the cosmological constant, which was to prevent gravitational collapse and maintain a stable universe. Einstein abandoned the cosmological constant when observations confirmed an expanding universe, consistent with observed reality.

My view strongly opposes reintroduction of the cosmological constant in modern cosmology, especially if it is done with irrational bias or without scientific consensus. Reintroducing this concept contrary to its original purpose and without scientific validation can be considered as neglect, as it goes against the principles and scientific method established by Einstein.

My approach emphasizes the importance of respecting historical context, scientific principles, and the original scientist's intent when discussing or reinterpreting scientific theories.

And I express my concern against those who attempt to re-introduce or propagate cosmic constants inconsistent with established scientific principles and historical context.

My strong disapproval and distrust of any act that would manipulate or misinterpret the work of a dead scientist especially Einstein's cosmological constant. And so I emphasize that such actions, which deviate from the original purpose of the scientist and established scientific principles, do not warrant debate or argument but deserve strict rejection and condemnation.

I have a deep concern for maintaining the integrity of scientific ideas, respecting the intentions of original scientists, and protecting against dishonest reinterpretation or manipulation of scientific theories.

Maintaining ethical standards and scientific integrity is essential, especially when dealing with significant scientific ideas and theories, and so my concern underscores the importance of respecting the legacy and intentions of scientists like Einstein.

Honesty, integrity, and fairness are crucial in all aspects of life, including scientific endeavours and discussion of scientific theories.

Natural justice encompasses the principles of fairness, reasonableness, and adherence to moral norms, is fundamental to ensuring fair treatment and fairness in a variety of contexts, including scientific discourse.

Natural justice, also known as procedural justice, is a fundamental concept of law and governance. It emphasizes the principles of impartiality, fairness and adherence to ethical standards in decision-making processes. These principles are important not only in the legal process, but also in various fields, including scientific research, policymaking, and social interaction.

In scientific discourse, the application of principles similar to natural justice ensures that discussions, debates and decisions are conducted fairly, with due regard for evidence, rationality and ethical norms. Adherence to these principles contributes to maintaining the integrity and credibility of scientific research and discussion.

#CosmologicalConstant #Einstein #AlbertEinstein #Hubble #IrrationalRestatement #IrrationalReintroduction