We Are Already Traveling Through Time: The Redundant Quest for a New Time Machine.

Soumendra Nath Thakur

28-10-2924

We are, in fact, continuously moving through time. This inherent progression renders the idea of inventing a "new" time machine both unnecessary and impossible. Every machine that facilitates motion—whether it's a car, a plane, or even our own footsteps—moves us through time as well as space. In this sense, all motion-related devices are already time machines, enabling us to travel forward in time naturally. Therefore, the pursuit of a separate or unique "time machine" overlooks the reality that our passage through time is a fundamental, ongoing aspect of existence, inseparable from any form of movement.

Universal Expansion is the Receding of Galaxies, Not Space Itself:

Soumendra Nath Thakur

28-10-2924

I see many posts on the expansion of the universe but those posts read like that of someone inspired by a childlike curiosity about the universe, yet lacking a commitment to rigorously studying science and mathematics.

Unfortunately, these posts convey several inaccuracies, largely rooted in a relativistic bias. Observational evidence suggests that dark energy exerts a repulsive effect, opposite to the attractive force of gravity. This repulsion causes isolated galaxies and galactic clusters to move toward the universe's edges, increasing the distance—and thus the space—between these structures. Although this process makes it appear as though the universe is expanding, it does not imply that space within the universe is expanding.

To clarify, we can observe that space within gravitationally bound systems, such as galaxies, remains unaffected by this expansion. The spatial structure within any galaxy, anchored by its central gravitational forces, does not expand. This phenomenon is feasible only if space itself is not expanding; if the entirety of universal space were expanding, we would see expansion occurring universally, including within each galaxy. However, this is not supported by observational data.

In summary, these posts incorrectly imply that space itself is expanding, a misconception driven by relativistic interpretations that treat space-time as a fundamental entity. This overlooks the concept that time emerges as a result of existential events, rather than as an inherent dimension.

#Expansion #UniversalExpansion #expansionofspace

A Supplementary resource (2) for ‘Phase Shift and Infinitesimal Wave Energy Loss Equations'.

Proportional Relationships in Oscillatory Wave Dynamics: Time Shifts and Energy Changes

Soumendra Nath Thakur

28-10-2024

Description: 

This study explores the mathematical relationships between phase shifts in oscillatory wave frequencies and their corresponding time periods and energy changes. The time period associated with a 1° phase shift, denoted as T(deg), is defined as the inverse of the product of 360 and the original frequency f₀. This period is directly proportional to the infinitesimal time shift Δt when f₀ remains constant. Additionally, the change in energy ΔE is expressed as the product of Planck’s constant h, the original frequency f₀, and the infinitesimal time shift Δt, establishing that ΔE is proportional to f₀ and inversely related to Δt. Furthermore, the study presents how the infinitesimal time shift Δtₓ associated with an x° phase shift is directly proportional to x under constant frequency conditions. This paper concludes with key proportional relationships that facilitate a deeper understanding of the dynamics within oscillatory wave systems.

Keywords: Oscillatory waves, phase shift, time period, energy change, Planck's constant, frequency, mathematical relationships, wave dynamics.

Equation Relationship:

Derivation: 

T(deg) = (1/360f₀) = Δt 

The time period corresponding to a 1° phase shift in the wave’s oscillatory frequency, denoted as the time period per degree T(deg), is defined as the inverse of the product of 360 and the wave’s original frequency f₀. This period T(deg) also represents the infinitesimal time shift Δt associated with a 1° phase shift. Consequently, when the wave's original frequency f₀ remains constant, T(deg) is directly proportional to Δt. Thus, T(deg)∝Δt when f₀ is constant.

ΔE = hf₀Δt 

The change in energy, ΔE, is given by the product of Planck’s constant h, the original frequency of the oscillatory wave f₀, and the infinitesimal time shift Δt associated with a 1° phase shift in the wave’s frequency. This relationship implies that ΔE is proportional to the original frequency f₀, and, in turn, f₀ is inversely proportional to the infinitesimal time shift Δt. Therefore, ΔE∝f₀ and f₀∝1/Δ.

Δtₓ = x(1/360f₀) 

The infinitesimal time shift, Δtₓ, associated with an x° phase shift in the wave's oscillatory frequency, is given by the product of the phase shift angle x and the inverse of the product of 360 and the original frequency f₀. This indicates that Δtₓ is directly proportional to the phase shift angle x when the original frequency f₀ remains constant. Therefore, Δtₓ ∝ x when f₀ is constant.

Conclusion:

The time period corresponding to a 1° phase shift in the wave's oscillatory frequency is proportional to the infinitesimal time shift associated with that phase shift, provided the original frequency of the wave remains constant. Additionally, the change in energy is proportional to the original frequency of the oscillatory wave, which is inversely related to the infinitesimal time shift associated with a 1° phase shift. Furthermore, the infinitesimal time shift associated with an x° phase shift in the wave's oscillatory frequency is directly proportional to the phase shift angle x when the original frequency is constant.

• T(deg) ∝ Δt when f₀ is constant.

• ΔE ∝ f₀, f₀ ∝ 1/Δt.

• Δtₓ ∝ x when f₀ is constant.

List of Denotations for Mathematical Terms:

• f₀ or fᴢₑᵣₒ: The original or initial frequency of the oscillatory wave, representing the base frequency at which the wave oscillates.

• h: Planck’s constant, a fundamental physical constant that relates the energy of a photon to its frequency.

• T(deg) or T𝑑𝑒𝑔: The time period corresponding to a 1° phase shift in the wave's oscillatory frequency, indicating the time required for this phase shift.

• x: The phase shift angle in degrees, used to denote a specific phase shift other than 1°, which affects the time increment proportionally.

• ΔE or δE: The change in energy, calculated as the product of Planck’s constant h, the initial frequency f₀, and the infinitesimal time shift Δt.  

• Δt or δt: The infinitesimal time shift (or time distortion) associated with a 1° phase shift in the wave's oscillatory frequency, representing the time increment for a very small phase shift in the oscillation.

• Δtₓ or δtₓ: The infinitesimal time shift (or time distortion) associated with an x° phase shift in the wave's oscillatory frequency, representing the cumulative time increment for a specified phase shift angle x.

Derivation Analysis:

1. Statement 1:

T(deg) = (1/360f₀) = Δt

This equation implies that T(deg), which might represent a time period defined in terms of degrees, is inversely proportional to f₀ (frequency). When f₀ is constant, T(deg) is directly proportional to Δt, which is confirmed by the relationship:

T(deg) ∝ Δt when f₀ is constant.

2. Energy Relationship:

ΔE = hf₀Δt 

Here, ΔE is proportional to the product of f₀ and Δt, not to each variable independently. This means: 

• ΔE depends on the combined effect of f₀ and Δt.

• If f₀ and Δt vary in inverse proportion (i.e., f₀ ∝ 1/Δ), ΔE remains consistent with expected physical behaviour (where higher frequencies correspond to shorter time intervals and vice versa).

3. Frequency-Time Relation:

f₀ ∝ 1/Δt 

This relationship aligns with physical intuition that as frequency f₀ increases, the time interval Δt decreases proportionally. This inverse relationship is essential for the consistency of the expression:

ΔE ∝ f₀, f₀ ∝ 1/Δt. 

4. Scaled Time Interval Δtₓ:

Δtₓ = x (1/360f₀) 

When f₀ is constant, Δtₓ is directly proportional to x, confirming that:

Δtₓ ∝ x when f₀ is constant

Conclusion:

Each statement logically follows from the previous ones, given the inverse relationship f₀ ∝ 1/Δt and the fact that ΔE depends on the product hf₀Δt rather than independently on f₀ or Δt. Thus, the presentation is mathematically consistent, aligning with the physical interpretation that higher frequencies correlate with shorter time intervals.

Interpreting Negative Mass in Quantum Gravity and the Role of Planck Scale in Virtual Particles:

Soumendra Nath Thakur 

27-10-2024

The question of negative mass or negative effective mass, potentially applicable to virtual particles at the quantum level, emerges in the context of Claudia de Rham's radical new theory of gravity.

In my interpretation, this consideration suggests that observable matter—including dark matter—possesses positive mass. We assess this positive mass through baryonic objects and visible energy, as well as the gravitational influence of dark matter on luminous matter. This framework aligns with classical mechanics, where gravity is regarded as an attractive force, or with extended classical mechanics, which also treats gravity as a force.

Conversely, virtual matter may exhibit negative mass, as seen in assessments of dark energy or "invisible energy." This negative mass is responsible for the repulsive force, or "anti-gravity," resulting from a negative effective or apparent mass, as suggested by observational findings and extended classical mechanics.

My interpretation draws on Planck scale concepts, including Planck length, Planck frequency, and Planck time. Since anything above the Planck scale is imperceptible to us and the frequency of any existence ultimately surpasses the Planck frequency, virtual particles likely exist beyond this threshold, suggesting that virtual particles may exhibit extreme gravitational effects.

#virtualparticle #NegativeMass #gravityasforce #antigravity #extendedclassicalmechanics #gravity

ResearchGate discussion: Is Spacetime Curvature the True Cause of Gravitational Lensing?

The discussion link

This discussion questions the conventional explanation of gravitational lensing as a result of spacetime curvature. Instead, it explores an alternative view, proposing that gravitational lensing arises from momentum exchange between photons and external gravitational fields. By analysing the symmetrical behaviour of photons, such as their energy gain (blueshift) and loss (redshift) around massive objects, this perspective challenges general relativity and opens the door to quantum gravity and flat spacetime models. The discussion aims to refine our theoretical understanding of how light and gravity truly interact.

Conceptual Foundation of the Discussion:

A photon, representing light, carries inherent energy denoted as E. As the photon ascends from the gravitational well of its emission source, it loses part of this energy, resulting in a redshift (increase in wavelength, Δλ>0). However, the photon’s behaviour changes significantly when it encounters a strong external gravitational field.

As the photon approaches a strong gravitational body, it undergoes a blueshift (decrease in wavelength, Δλ<0) due to its interaction with the external gravitational field. This shift occurs as a result of electromagnetic-gravitational interaction, causing the photon to follow an arc-shaped trajectory. During this process, the photon’s momentum increases, described by the relation Δρ = h/Δλ, where h is Planck’s constant. This momentum gain reflects the gravitational influence on the photon's trajectory.

Completing half of the arc path (1/2 arc) around the gravitational body, the blueshift transitions into a redshift (Δλ>0) as the photon begins to lose momentum (Δρ=h/Δλ). This process indicates a symmetrical momentum exchange, where the photon experiences a balanced gain and loss of external energy (Eg), preserving symmetry in its overall energy behaviour.

Importantly, while the photon undergoes these external changes in wavelength, momentum, and energy during its trajectory around the gravitational body, it retains its inherent energy (E). The only exception occurs when the photon loses energy (ΔE) while escaping the gravitational well of its source. Thus, despite these external interactions, the photon’s inherent energy remains conserved, except for the loss associated with its initial emission.

After bypassing the gravitational field, the photon resumes its original trajectory, maintaining its inherent energy (E) and continuing unaffected by further gravitational influences.

Soumendra Nath Thakur added a reply

Dear Mr. Preston Guynn Mr. Esa Säkkinen and Mr. Julius Chuhwak Matthew

This discussion addresses the question, "Is Spacetime Curvature the True Cause of Gravitational Lensing?" and critically examines the conventional explanation, which attributes gravitational lensing to spacetime curvature. Instead, it proposes an alternative perspective in which gravitational lensing results from momentum exchange between photons and external gravitational fields. This conclusion is supported by analysing symmetrical photon behaviours, such as energy gain (blueshift) and loss (redshift) near massive objects, which reveal the actual mechanisms driving gravitational lensing—distinct from the spacetime curvature model proposed by general relativity. This discourse aims to refine our theoretical understanding of the fundamental interactions between light and gravity.

The scientific foundation of this perspective, as articulated in the study "Photon Interactions with External Gravitational Fields: True Cause of Gravitational Lensing," rests on established quantum and classical mechanics principles—specifically, Planck’s energy-frequency relation E=hf and the photon momentum-wavelength relation ρ=h/λ. These equations illustrate how photons experience symmetrical energy shifts (blueshift and redshift) through gravitational interactions, offering a basis for lensing that preserves inherent photon energy and frames gravitational influence as an external, rather than intrinsic, interaction.

Together, these equations suggest that momentum exchange between photons and gravitational fields effectively account for lensing effects. The study’s analyses of photon energy conservation and symmetrical behaviour near massive bodies provide an alternative mechanism for gravitational lensing, distinct from the spacetime curvature paradigm and posing a potential challenge to conventional interpretations. This discourse thus emphasizes momentum exchange over relativistic spacetime curvature, aligning with the defined scope and goals outlined in the initial discussion.

For a comprehensive exploration of this study, please refer to the full text at

Preprint Photon Interactions with External Gravitational Fields: True...

and

Data Photon Energy and Redshift Analysis in Galactic Measurements...

Warm regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur