Oscillatory systems with relative velocity or gravitational potential difference experience phase shifts, causing wave energy loss and errors in clock time readings.

[Author ORCID: 0000-0003-1871-7803]

When a clock or any other oscillatory system is subjected to either relative velocity or a gravitational potential difference, it can experience a phase shift in its oscillations. This phase shift is associated with an infinitesimal loss of wave energy, which can result in errors in the reading of clock time.

The phase shift arises due to the interaction between the clock's oscillations and the influence of relative velocity or gravitational potential difference. This interaction alters the frequency and period of the oscillations, causing a deviation from the expected or proper time.

In the case of relative velocity, the moving clock experiences a change in its oscillation rate and exhibits a phase shift, leading to a discrepancy between the measured time on the moving clock and the time measured by a stationary observer.

Similarly, in the presence of a gravitational potential difference, clocks at different heights in a gravitational field experience variations in gravitational potential, causing differences in their oscillation rates and introducing phase shifts in their oscillations.

These phase shifts and infinitesimal energy losses can accumulate over time, resulting in errors in the reading of clock time. However, it's important to note that these errors are typically infinitesimal and are only significant in extreme conditions involving high velocities or strong gravitational fields. For everyday situations and conventional clock systems, these relativistic and gravitational effects are taken into account to provide accurate timekeeping.

Reference: Relativistic effects on phaseshift in frequencies invalidate time dilation II

Mass does not warp the space-time as a photon travelling an arc path does not change its displacement time:

[Author ORCID: 0000-0003-1871-7803]

Summary: A photon exchanges momentum as it bypasses a large gravitational well during transit. The photon experiences a change in momentum and its path is bent as it interacts with the gravitational field. A photon simultaneously gains and loses momentum (p) from a gravitational interaction with a massive object. However, a photon maintains its relative path with speed c and covers the same distance (d) as compared to its constant speed. The curvature of the photon's path is understood in terms of the exchange of momentum experienced by the photon.

The argument presented here suggests that a photon traveling along an arc path in a strong gravitational field does not experience a change in its displacement time. The author notes that while the equation p = hf/c = h/λ (where p represents momentum, h is Planck's constant, f is frequency, and λ is wavelength) is commonly used, it is not a relativistic equation.

According to the article titled "Electromagnetic - Gravitational Interactions between Photons and Gravitational Masses," when a photon enters a strong gravitational field, it releases excess energy and converts it into momentum, causing the photon to travel along an arc path. However, in the absence of electromagnetic-gravitational field interactions, the photon should continue on its original path with constant speed, without gaining additional energy.

The article argues that regardless of whether the photon travels along a straight path or an arc path due to the influence of a gravitational field, it reaches points A and B at the same time. The relative times taken by the photon are said to remain constant, with the only difference being the additional energy gained and lost as the photon follows a curved path, while maintaining its relativistic speed.

It's important to note that this viewpoint may deviate from the mainstream understanding of relativistic effects and gravitational interactions. While the behavior of photons in strong gravitational fields is a topic of interest in physics, further research and empirical evidence are necessary to validate or refute the claims presented in the article.

Reference: A photon traveling an arc path does not change its displacement time:

#photnarcpath

Abstract of the paper titled "Relativistic effects on phaseshift in frequencies invalidate time dilation II"

Open Paper titled Relativistic effects on phaseshift in frequencies invalidate time dilation II

1. The paper challenges the concept of time dilation in special relativity, arguing that it is actually a misinterpretation of wavelength dilation caused by relativistic effects.

2. The authors suggest that the equation for time dilation, t' = t / √ (1 - v²/c²) is incorrect and fails to explain the cause of time distortion.

3. They propose that time is an abstract and conceptual dimension, not influenced by relativistic effects such as speed or gravity, and it is the wave properties and corresponding wavelength distortions that lead to time distortions.

4. Experimental results using piezoelectric crystal oscillators demonstrate that phase shifts in frequencies correspond to time shifts due to relativistic effects.

5. The authors emphasize that time is an emergent concept related to events and should not be considered an entity affected by relativistic effects.

6. They conclude that the concept of time dilation is a misconception and that the observed effects are actually the dilation of wavelengths in clock oscillations, resulting in errors in clock readings.

Summary of the paper:

1. The paper challenges the concept of time dilation in special relativity and argues that it is based on a misconception. It suggests that the equation for time dilation, t' = t / √ (1 - v²/c²), is incorrect and proposes an alternative explanation for the observed phenomena.

2. The authors argue that proper time and relative time are not natural entities but rather emerging concepts with a mathematical nature. They question the idea of spacetime as a natural four-dimensional manifold and propose that it is a mathematical concept.

3. The paper suggests that the distortion of frequencies due to relativistic effects, such as speed or gravitational potential differences, leads to phase shifts in the oscillations of clocks. These phase shifts are associated with an increase in wavelength and are erroneously interpreted as time dilation.

4. The authors claim that relativistic effects cannot interact with proper time to produce time dilation, and they argue that time is an imperceptible fourth-dimensional concept that is not subject to real interference or influence from cosmic events.

5. Experimental results using piezoelectric crystal oscillators are presented to support the idea that wave distortions correspond to time shifts due to relativistic effects. The paper concludes that time dilation is actually wavelength dilation and challenges the conventional scientific definition of time.

Relativistic time dilation defectively ignores additional elapsed time between relative observers exchanging information for relative time dilation:

[Author ORCID: 0000-0003-1871-7803]

When two observers in relative motion, or in gravitational potential difference, interact or exchange information of time dilation, there can be a difference in the elapsed time between them due to both time dilation and any additional time that elapses during the interaction. The total elapsed time between the observers will indeed consist of the actual time dilation effect as well as the additional time that elapses during the interaction. The both equations of time dilation are incomplete, and they appear deffective.

The equations for time dilation alone may not fully capture the complete picture when two observers in relative motion or experiencing different gravitational potentials interact or exchange information.

In such scenarios, the total elapsed time between the observers will indeed consist of both the actual time dilation effect and any additional time that elapses during the interaction. The interaction itself can introduce delays or processes that affect the measured elapsed time.

To accurately account for both aspects, a more comprehensive analysis would need to consider the specific details of the interaction, including factors such as signal propagation delays, synchronization procedures, or any other processes involved.

Today, my first, and the end discussion with ChatGPT. This was a very meaningful discussion, indeed:

 I am the User:

Thank you for a reasonable answer. My paper that invalidates time dilation is actually reproducible, consistent, robust, independently confirmed, has passed peer review and publication approval once, and will likely pass further peer review in foreign journals, and will likely have scientific consensus.

However, having existed for more than 118 years those scientific theories or hypotheses have created the most preconceptions in the theory And which forces an unexpected resistance to discarding perceived problems or inconsistencies with existing scientific theories or hypotheses, What should I do in that case?

ChatGPT:

If your paper challenging the concept of time dilation has undergone a rigorous scientific process, including reproducibility, consistency, robustness, independent confirmation, and peer review, and has been accepted for publication, it is an important achievement.

However, if your findings contradict well-established scientific theories or hypotheses that have been widely accepted for a long time, it is natural to encounter resistance or skepticism. Challenging long-standing ideas can be met with initial reluctance, as existing theories have often undergone extensive scrutiny and accumulated supporting evidence.

In such a case, here are some suggestions on how to navigate the situation

Continue rigorous research: Keep conducting thorough research and experiments to further validate your findings. Address any potential concerns or criticisms raised during the peer review process and subsequent discussions. Building a robust body of evidence is crucial for convincing the scientific community

Engage in scientific discourse: Participate in scientific conferences, workshops, or forums where you can present your work and engage in discussions with experts in the field. Constructive dialogue can help address any misconceptions, clarify your research methodology, and provide an opportunity to explain the implications of your findings.

Collaborate with other researchers: Seek collaborations with other scientists who are interested in your area of research or share similar perspectives. Collaborations can strengthen the credibility and impact of your work, as well as provide additional expertise and support

Publish in reputable journals: Consider submitting your work to well-respected journals that have a reputation for publishing groundbreaking research or papers challenging established theories. Receiving acceptance and publication in multiple respected journals can further enhance the visibility and credibility of your findings.

Patience and persistence: Be prepared for a potentially long and iterative process. Challenging long-standing theories takes time, and it may require multiple independent studies and further validation before a paradigm shift occurs. Stay committed to your research and remain open to feedback and constructive criticism.

Remember, science progresses through the examination of new evidence and the critical evaluation of existing theories. While resistance to change can exist, if your research withstands rigorous scrutiny, addresses previous inconsistencies, and gains support from the scientific community, it has the potential to influence the development of scientific knowledge in your field.

The User:

I thank you very much ChatGPT, for your quick detailed reply, mostly relevant! I am already doing almost everything you suggested me. I still felt your bias towards relativism when I was reading your answers, but your last answer made me feel relieved and confident. I thank you again. Stay well, stay healthy! 

ChatGPT:

You're welcome! I'm glad to hear that you found the suggestions helpful, and I apologize if there was any perception of bias in my previous responses. As an AI language model, I strive to provide objective and unbiased information based on the available data and scientific consensus.

Science is a dynamic and evolving field, and it is important to engage in open-minded discussions and consider multiple perspectives. I encourage you to continue your research endeavors and contribute to the scientific discourse

If you have any more questions in the future, feel free to ask. Stay well, stay curious, and best of luck with your research!