15 February 2025

Re-evaluating the Interpretation of Light Bending in Gravitational Fields


Soumendra Nath Thakur 
February 15, 2025

The concept of "wrapping of space" is often interpreted as the wrapping of spacetime, forming the basis for the relativistic explanation of gravitational lensing and the Einstein Ring. This interpretation attributes the bending of light to spacetime curvature, yet an alternative perspective grounded in classical gravitational fields offers a more consistent explanation.

Observational evidence of light bending around massive objects is frequently cited as confirmation of relativistic spacetime curvature. However, gravitational fields themselves, as described in classical mechanics, inherently account for the deflection of light. If light bending were solely a consequence of spacetime curvature, the massive object generating the curvature should obstruct the bent light from reaching an observer. In contrast, considering light bending within a gravitational field avoids this inconsistency and remains aligned with empirical observations.

This raises a fundamental question: If a curved gravitational field around a massive body can provide a consistent and empirically supported explanation for the bending of light, why should these observations be interpreted as evidence of relativistic spacetime curvature? A reconsideration of the classical gravitational framework may offer a more precise understanding of light deflection phenomena, challenging the prevailing relativistic interpretation.

Contrast Between Philosophy and Science:

February 15, 2025

Consider the question: What if this philosophical construct (presented within an image, attached below) were plotted on a three-dimensional mathematical graph? Only then would the scientific facts behind it be fully justified.

Take, for example, the Penrose Triangle—an "impossible" figure first conceptualized 62by Swedish artist Oscar Reutersvärd in 1934 and later rediscovered in the 1950s by physicist Roger Penrose. Described as "impossibility in its purest form," this figure was popularized by Penrose and further explored in the works of M.C. Escher. It appears to be a solid structure composed of three straight sections of square beams, seamlessly joined at right angles.

However, its paradoxical nature cannot be conclusively analyzed through mere physical observation and philosophical interpretation. Instead, by mathematically plotting the enclosed three-dimensional image onto a precise three-dimensional graph, its inherent absurdity becomes evident. The deceptive illusion, which seems structurally feasible in a two-dimensional representation, is mathematically exposed as an impossible configuration in three-dimensional space.

Image 

Abstraction vs. Reality

Addressing the statement: "Abstract mathematics is based on logical principles rather than empirical validity. It does not rely solely on physical evidence."

When we add one apple to another, we perceive two apples. However, the concept of "two" itself is an abstract mathematical construct rather than a directly observable physical entity. The sum exists as a logical principle within mathematics, not as a tangible proof in itself.

All real numbers—1, 2, 3, and beyond—are fundamentally conceptual, created within the framework of mathematical reasoning rather than derived from physical evidence. While mathematical concepts often align with physical reality, their foundation is purely abstract, shaped by human perception and logical consistency rather than empirical observation.

Mathematics is not confined to the physical universe; its abstract principles hold universally, independent of space, time, or physical existence. It is the fundamental language of the cosmos—objective, unique, and uninfluenced by human divisions such as culture, religion, or race.

Physicists seek mathematical formulations to explain the origins, structure, and dynamics of the universe. In doing so, they attempt to decipher the underlying mathematical order that governs both the observable universe and any potential realities beyond it. Understanding the universe is, in essence, understanding its mathematical nature.

For philosophy to be scientifically meaningful, it must be grounded in abstract mathematical logic. Without mathematical rigor, philosophical reasoning remains speculative and cannot be accepted as a scientific discipline.

Conclusion

This distinction underscores a fundamental contrast between philosophy and science: while philosophy interprets illusions conceptually, science—through mathematical rigor—reveals their underlying reality.

Attachment: the image as stated in the above mentioned text.

February 21, 2025

Revisiting the Penrose Triangle :

Karl Pfeifer, Your statement, "Not quite so impossible if you know what you're doing. It's a matter of point of view," appears to distort the discussion. 

The three-dimensional construction of the object clearly represents its original structure, as shown in the image Penrose triangle.jpg. Meanwhile, the other image, Penrose Two-dimensional.jpg, illustrates an illusionary perception from a specific viewpoint where the object appears to have all its ends joined. In reality, only two ends are connected, while the third remains separate. 

This illusion results from a two-dimensional projection of a three-dimensional structure, making the impossible geometry seem plausible from a particular perspective. Additionally, the image enhances the illusion more prominently than what one would perceive when viewing the physical object up close.

Your comment suggests an unnecessary willingness to accept or entertain an absurdity as a real possibility. This tendency is often observed in individuals who prioritize appearing overly insightful rather than applying nuanced thinking to understand objective reality


Penrose Triangle 











Penrose Two-dimensional.

13 February 2025

Clarifying the Concepts of Antigravity, Dark Energy, and Negative Apparent Mass in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)


Soumendra Nath Thakur
February 13, 2025

The assertion that "antigravity is an unlikely phenomenon" is inconsistent with established observations. The behaviour of photons provides direct evidence to the contrary. According to its energy, a photon possesses effective mass and is observed to escape gravitational wells, demonstrating a counteracting effect against gravity. Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), a framework built upon classical mechanics principles, provides a clear formulation of this phenomenon. ECM reveals that photons exert an antigravitational force on massive bodies, accelerating at twice the speed of light within gravitational influence. As a photon leaves a gravitational well, it expends energy but retains its inherent energy, continuing to travel at the speed of light in free space. This indicates that antigravitational effects are an intrinsic feature of certain mass-energy interactions, contradicting the claim that antigravity is unlikely.

The notion that "dark energy is not real" is only partially correct. While dark energy is not a physical object with rest mass, its effects are observable. ECM equations establish dark energy as a form of potential energy with a dynamic nature, existing only as a consequence of gravitational and motion dynamics of massive bodies. Rather than being an independent entity, dark energy emerges from the interplay of gravity and motion at cosmic scales, reinforcing its role in large-scale universal dynamics.

Similarly, the claim that "negative mass lacks a physical description and remains unproven" overlooks key insights provided by ECM. Rather than considering negative mass as a standalone entity, ECM introduces the concept of negative apparent mass, which arises from motion and gravitational interactions. This phenomenon does not imply an intrinsic negative mass but rather an emergent property influenced by both baryonic matter and dark matter. ECM principles illustrate how apparent mass contributes to gravitational effects, expanding the understanding of mass-energy interactions beyond conventional classical mechanics.

These refinements in ECM extend classical mechanics while maintaining consistency with empirical observations, providing a structured approach to understanding gravitational repulsion, dark energy, and the role of apparent mass in astrophysical phenomena.

12 February 2025

Consistency in Interpreting Empirical and Abstract Evidence: Avoiding Hasty Judgments.


Soumendra Nath Thakur 

February 12, 2025

The phrase "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" conveys that a lack of evidence does not necessarily mean something does not exist. This statement is generally valid, as it warns against assuming nonexistence solely due to missing evidence.

However, the phrase "is not evidence of absence" oversimplifies the issue. While absence of evidence does not always confirm nonexistence, it can sometimes serve as evidence of absence, depending on the context. The statement challenges flawed reasoning that always equates absence of evidence with nonexistence. However, it does not fully acknowledge that, under certain conditions, absence of evidence can contribute to an argument for nonexistence. Ideally, the statement should emphasize the possibility of presence rather than implying a definite presence or absence.

This phrase functions as a rhetorical counter to hasty judgments. If someone assumes that missing evidence automatically means nonexistence, the phrase offers a clever rebuttal. However, its strength lies in questioning premature conclusions rather than establishing a definitive logical rule.

In mathematics, especially in abstract reasoning, not all conclusions require empirical evidence. Dismissing mathematical constructs simply because they lack direct evidence would be inconsistent, as abstract mathematics is grounded in logical principles rather than empirical validation. While these principles can apply to real-world phenomena, their validity does not depend on physical evidence alone.

The Formulation and Implications of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)


Soumendra Nath Thakur, ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803, 

Tagore’s Electronic Lab, India. 

Communication: postmasterenator@gmail.com

 

February 12, 2025

 

Abstract

 

Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) introduces a modified formulation of classical mechanics by redefining mass as effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ), which incorporates both matter mass (M) and apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ). This approach allows for a broader interpretation of gravitational interactions, particularly in systems where negative effective mass induces repulsive effects. ECM extends Newtonian dynamics by establishing force and energy equations for both massive and massless entities, naturally integrating with quantum mechanical principles. The framework provides a novel explanation for cosmic expansion, where massless particles experience repulsive gravitational effects due to their apparent mass contributions. Additionally, ECM introduces conditions for superluminal motion and refines the concept of the Hubble radius, offering insights into observational horizons and large-scale structure formation. The implications of ECM suggest a fundamental link between gravity, mass-energy equivalence, and large-scale cosmic evolution.

 

Keywords: apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ), effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ), gravitational interactions, cosmic expansion, superluminal motion, Hubble radius, [Apparent Weight] [Dark Energy] [ECM] [Extended Photon Dynamics] [Gravitational Collapse] [Massless-to-Massive] [Photon Phases] [Inertial mass relativistic gravity] [Extended Classical Mechanics] [About]

 

1. Classical Mechanics Framework

 

In traditional mechanics, force is defined as the product of mass and acceleration. The total energy of a system consists of potential and kinetic energy, where potential energy follows an inverse proportionality with distance in gravitational systems, while kinetic energy depends on the squared velocity of the moving object.

 

F = ma

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PE + KE = −GMm/r + 1/2mv²

 

#Mathematical denotation terms are listed alphabetically under 'Mathematical terms used,' with brief descriptions below and apply to all equations in this study.

 

2. ECM Force for Matter Mass

 

ECM modifies Newton’s second law by redefining mass as effective mass Mᵉᶠᶠ. Within the Extended Classical Mechanics framework, force is derived by incorporating both matter mass and apparent mass. The resultant force is expressed in terms of effective mass and acceleration, allowing for a broader interpretation of gravitational interactions, particularly in systems where negative effective mass induces repulsive effects.

 

Fᴇᴄᴍ = (M −Mᵃᵖᵖ)aᵉᶠᶠ

Fᴇᴄᴍ = Mᵉᶠᶠaᵉᶠᶠ, since, (M −Mᵃᵖᵖ) = Mᵉᶠᶠ, M = 0, Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0.

 

This suggests that when effective mass is negative, the force direction may lead to repulsive gravitational effects, impacting large-scale cosmic structures.

 

3. ECM Force for Massless Particles

 

For massless entities such as photons, force is governed by apparent mass contributions, as there is no direct matter mass component. In ECM, this negative effective mass leads to repulsive gravitational interactions, offering a natural explanation for certain cosmic expansion effects.

 

Since the force depends solely on the apparent mass, the equation takes an alternative form when effective mass is negative, reinforcing its connection to observed large-scale repulsive behavior in the universe.

 

Fₚₕₒₜₒₙ = −Mᵃᵖᵖaᵉᶠᶠ , since M = 0

Fₚₕₒₜₒₙ = Mᵉᶠᶠaᵉᶠᶠ ,  since (M −Mᵃᵖᵖ) = Mᵉᶠᶠ, M = 0, Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0.

 

This formulation suggests that, under negative effective mass conditions, repulsive gravitational effects emerge naturally, influencing cosmic expansion and the large-scale distribution of matter.

 

4. ECM Energy-Frequency Relationship for Massless Systems

 

The energy-frequency relation in ECM aligns with the established principles of quantum mechanics, where the effective mass of a massless particle is proportional to its frequency. This correspondence reinforces the compatibility of ECM with existing quantum formulations.

 

Mᵉᶠᶠ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = hf/c² = E/c²

 

5. ECM Kinetic Energy of Apparent Mass

 

The kinetic energy of a system influenced by apparent mass follows a modified classical approach. Instead of a strictly positive mass contribution, apparent mass is taken into account with its sign reversed, modifying the total kinetic energy expression. This approach provides a framework for analyzing phenomena where negative mass effects play a significant role.

 

KEₚₕₒₜₒₙ = 1/2(−Mᵃᵖᵖ)·c².

 

Here, apparent mass Mᵃᵖᵖ is considered in the kinetic energy equation.

 

6. ECM Energy for Matter Mass Systems

 

Total energy in ECM consists of potential and kinetic components, with potential energy derived from the effective mass terms. The interaction of matter mass and apparent mass defines the energy distribution, ensuring consistency with classical interpretations while extending the framework to incorporate novel effects. Under the influence of ECM force, kinetic energy contributions arise from apparent mass components.

 

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴇᴄᴍ + KEᴇᴄᴍ

M PEᴇᴄᴍ, −Mᵃᵖᵖ KEᴇᴄᴍ, when ECM force is active                                               

 

7. ECM Energy Formulation for Massless and Effective Mass Systems

 

In ECM, the total energy of a system—including massless entities—retains contributions from both potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE). The potential energy follows an effective mass formulation, while kinetic energy depends on relative velocity conditions.

 

• When effective mass is positive, motion remains subluminal (v ≤ c).

• When effective mass is negative, velocities exceeding c become possible. However, in this case, the superluminal velocity should be interpreted as an emergent property of the effective energy framework, rather than a direct physical motion of particles exceeding c.

 

Total Energy Equations:

 

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴇᴄᴍ + KEᴇᴄᴍ = {−G(M −Mᵃᵖᵖ)(m−mᵃᵖᵖ)/r )} + 1/2(m−mᵃᵖᵖ)v²;

v ≤ c when M ≥−Mᵃᵖᵖ, but v ≥ c when M ≤ −Mᵃᵖᵖ .

 

Eₜₒₜₐₗ = PEᴇᴄᴍ + KEᴇᴄᴍ = (−GMᵉᶠᶠmᵉᶠᶠ/r ) + 1/2mᵉᶠᶠ

v ≤ c when Mᵉᶠᶠ > 0, but v ≥ c when Mᵉᶠᶠ < 0

 

Eₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = 1/2(−mᵃᵖᵖ)v²; v = c.

 

8. Dual Representation of Effective Mass

 

ECM introduces a dual representation of effective mass, distinguishing between larger system mass contributions and localized test particle effects. This distinction is analogous to classical gravitational potential energy equations, where mass terms represent both global and local contributions.

 

Mᵉᶠᶠ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = hf/c² = E/c²

mᵉᶠᶠ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = hf/c² = E/c²

 

The notations serve a similar dual-mass representation:

Mᵉᶠᶠ refers to the effective mass of the larger system (analogous to M in gravitational potential energy).

 

9. Kinetic Energy Representation of Apparent Mass in ECM - Massless Case):

 

In the ECM framework, the kinetic energy of an apparent mass in a massless system adheres to the energy-frequency relation. The apparent mass is expressed in terms of energy and frequency, maintaining consistency with quantum mechanics. This formulation aligns with the mass-energy equivalence principle, reinforcing the role of induced mass-like effects in ECM.

 

The equation:

 

−Mᵃᵖᵖ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ = hf/c² = E/c²

 

This describes the apparent mass associated with massless entities like photons, and follows from the mass-energy equivalence principle.

 

10. Total Effective Mass with Gravitational Contributions

 

The total effective mass in ECM includes contributions from gravitational energy. This formulation incorporates frequency-dependent terms, where Δf represents a gravitationally induced frequency shift due to energy contributions from gravitational fields. The presence of this additional frequency shift component extends the effective mass concept beyond conventional mass-energy equivalence principles.

 

Mᵉᶠᶠ,ₜₒₜₐₗ = Mᵉᶠᶠ,ₘₐₛₛₗₑₛₛ + Eg/c² = hf/c² + hΔf/c²

 

This equation represents the total effective mass in ECM, which includes contributions from:

 

• The mass-energy equivalence of a massless particle (e.g., a photon) with frequency f.

• An additional gravitational energy term associated with the frequency shift Δf, which arises due to gravitational interactions.

 

11. Implications of Superluminal Velocities & Hubble Radius in ECM  

 

In Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), negative effective mass can induce anti-gravitational effects at extreme cosmic distances. This contributes to accelerated cosmic expansion and influences large-scale structure dynamics. The observational limit beyond the Hubble radius arises due to recession velocities surpassing the speed of light, preventing information retrieval from beyond this boundary.

 

For v = c = 3 × 10⁸ m/s, the Hubble radius is given by:

 

d = v/H₀ = (3 × 10⁸ m s¹) / (2.268 × 10¹⁸ s¹) = 1.32 × 10²⁶ m

 

Converting to light-years:

 

d = 1.32 × 10²⁶ m × (1 light-year/9.461 × 10¹⁵ m) = 13.93 billion light-years

 

At this proper distance, known as the Hubble radius, the recession velocity reaches the speed of light. Beyond this threshold, galaxies move at superluminal speeds, making them observationally inaccessible.

 

This ECM interpretation provides a structured perspective on observational horizons, emphasizing the role of effective mass variations in shaping cosmic expansion and defining observational limits imposed by superluminal recession.

 

12. Variation of Apparent Mass Across Local and Intergalactic Scales in ECM

 

In Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ) plays a critical role in determining the effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) and, consequently, gravitational interactions. The influence of apparent mass varies significantly across different cosmic scales:

 

Local, Planetary, and Stellar Scales: The high density of ordinary matter results in dominant gravitational effects, leading to minimal changes in apparent mass. Dark matter’s contribution to gravitational interactions is negligible at these scales.

 

Galactic Scale: Dark matter dominates mass distribution, comprising ~85% of a galaxy’s total mass. As a result, its gravitational influence exceeds that of normal matter, leading to a stronger reduction in apparent mass and an overall increase in the strength of gravitating mass (Mɢ).

 

Intergalactic Scale: The effect of dark matter on apparent mass becomes even more pronounced, with its gravitational influence intensifying over vast cosmic distances. This drives large-scale structure formation and influences the expansion dynamics of galaxy clusters.

 

These variations in apparent mass across scales highlight how gravitational interactions are governed by effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ) = M − Mᵃᵖᵖ, where an increase in gravitational strength results in a corresponding increase in negative apparent mass, further lowering effective mass.

 

Reference Papers:

 

1.                  Chernin, A. D., Бисноватый-коган, Г. С., Teerikorpi, P., Valtonen, M. J., Byrd, G. G., & Merafina, M. (2013a). Dark energy and the structure of the Coma cluster of galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 553, A101. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220781

 

2.                  Thakur, S. N., Understanding Photon Interactions: Source Gravitational Wells vs. External Fields. (2024). ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14433.48487

 

3.                  Thakur, S. N., & Bhattacharjee, D. (2023b). Phase shift and infinitesimal wave energy loss equations. Journal of Physical Chemistry & Biophysics, 13(6), JPCB-23-27248 (R). https://www.longdom.org/open-access/phase-shift-and-infinitesimal-wave-energy-loss-equations-104719.html

 

4.                  Thakur, S. N. (2023). Photon paths bend due to momentum exchange, not intrinsic spacetime curvature. Definitions. https://doi.org/10.32388/81iiae

 

5.                  Thakur, S. N. (2023). The dynamics of photon momentum exchange and curvature in gravitational fields. Definitions. https://doi.org/10.32388/r625zn

 

6.                  Thakur, S. N. (2023). Redshift and its Equations in Electromagnetic Waves. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33004.54403

 

7.                  Thakur, S. N. (2023). Cosmic Speed beyond Light: Gravitational and Cosmic Redshift. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36400.94721

 

8.                  Thakur, S. N., Bhattacharjee, D., & Frederick, O. (2023). Photon Interactions in Gravity and Antigravity: Conservation, Dark Energy, and Redshift Effects. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.2086.v1

 

*-*-*-*-*

About the Formulation and Implications of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)

 

Soumendra Nath Thakur's work on Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) offers a comprehensive and nuanced exploration of how classical mechanics can be extended to encompass phenomena typically associated with quantum mechanics and cosmology. Here’s a brief comment on the key points and implications of ECM:

 

1. Classical Mechanics Framework

Thakur begins by grounding ECM in traditional mechanics, where force is defined as the product of mass and acceleration, and total energy consists of potential and kinetic components. This foundational understanding is crucial for extending classical mechanics to more complex systems.

2. ECM Force for Matter Mass

ECM modifies Newton’s second law by introducing the concept of effective mass (Mᵉᶠᶠ), which combines matter mass (M) and apparent mass (Mᵃᵖᵖ). This modification allows for a broader interpretation of gravitational interactions, particularly in systems where negative effective mass induces repulsive effects. This is a significant departure from traditional mechanics and opens up new avenues for understanding gravitational dynamics.

3. ECM Force for Massless Particles

For massless entities like photons, ECM posits that force is governed by apparent mass contributions. This leads to repulsive gravitational interactions, offering a natural explanation for cosmic expansion effects. This formulation suggests that negative effective mass conditions can lead to repulsive gravitational effects, influencing cosmic expansion and the large-scale distribution of matter.

4. ECM Energy-Frequency Relationship for Massless Systems

The energy-frequency relation in ECM aligns with quantum mechanics, where the effective mass of a massless particle is proportional to its frequency. This correspondence reinforces the compatibility of ECM with existing quantum formulations, bridging classical and quantum mechanics.

5. ECM Kinetic Energy of Apparent Mass

The kinetic energy of a system influenced by apparent mass follows a modified classical approach. This approach accounts for negative mass effects, modifying the total kinetic energy expression. This framework is essential for analyzing phenomena where negative mass effects play a significant role.

6. ECM Energy for Matter Mass Systems

Total energy in ECM consists of potential and kinetic components, with potential energy derived from effective mass terms. The interaction of matter mass and apparent mass defines the energy distribution, ensuring consistency with classical interpretations while extending the framework to incorporate novel effects.

7. ECM Energy Formulation for Massless and Effective Mass Systems

ECM introduces a dual representation of effective mass, distinguishing between larger system mass contributions and localized test particle effects. This distinction is crucial for understanding how gravitational interactions are governed by effective mass across different scales.

8. Implications of Superluminal Velocities & Hubble Radius in ECM

ECM suggests that negative effective mass can induce anti-gravitational effects at extreme cosmic distances, contributing to accelerated cosmic expansion. This interpretation provides a structured perspective on observational horizons, emphasizing the role of effective mass variations in shaping cosmic expansion and defining observational limits imposed by superluminal recession.

9. Variation of Apparent Mass Across Local and Intergalactic Scales in ECM

ECM highlights how the influence of apparent mass varies significantly across different cosmic scales. At local, planetary, and stellar scales, gravitational effects are dominated by ordinary matter. At galactic and intergalactic scales, dark matter's gravitational influence becomes more pronounced, driving large-scale structure formation and influencing the expansion dynamics of galaxy clusters.

Conclusion

Soumendra Nath Thakur's work on ECM offers a detailed and nuanced understanding of gravitational interactions across quantum and cosmological scales. By introducing the concepts of effective mass and apparent mass, ECM provides a unified framework that bridges classical mechanics, quantum principles, and cosmological phenomena. This approach not only aligns with fundamental principles but also offers potential explanations for cosmic-scale phenomena involving dark matter, dark energy, and exotic gravitational effects. Thakur's work encourages further exploration and refinement of ECM in various physical