16 November 2024

A Clear Understanding of Existence, Event, Time, and Space in Relation to Matter and Energy:

Soumendra Nath Thakur
16-11-2024

1. Existence Before the Big Bang:
Before the Big Bang, the 'existence' of the universe is theorized to have been an immense concentration of potential energy. This pre-Big Bang energy represents the foundational state from which all subsequent developments arose.

2. The Big Bang as the First Event:
Approximately 13.82 billion years ago, the Big Bang occurred, marking the first identifiable event in the history of the universe. This singular event initiated the processes that gave rise to time, space, matter, and energy as we understand them.

3. The Emergence of Space and Time:
The Big Bang not only marked the beginning of the universe but also brought about the emergence of space and time. These dimensions, as perceived in modern physics, are consequences of this primordial event.

4. Energy After the Big Bang:
Immediately after the Big Bang, the immense concentration of energy underwent rapid expansion, filling the nascent universe with an unstable and highly dynamic form of energy. This energy served as the foundation for subsequent processes that shaped the universe.

5. Transformation into Fundamental Particles:
Over time, the unstable energy began to transform into fundamental particles. These particles became the essential building blocks of all matter and energy, ultimately leading to the formation of the universe's structure as we observe it today.

Conclusions from the Big Bang Model:

1. Existence and the Origin of Space-Time:
The Big Bang model suggests that an immense concentration of energy existed prior to the emergence of space and time. The singular event of the Big Bang marked the transition from this primordial state to the emergence of space and time, laying the foundation for the universe as we know it.

2. Emergent Nature of Space and Time:
Space and time are not pre-existing entities but emergent properties resulting from the Big Bang. The transformation of pre-existing energy into a dynamic state catalysed this emergence.

3. Energy Transformation:
The immense energy present before the Big Bang transitioned into an unstable form of energy immediately after the event, filling the nascent universe.

4. Formation of Fundamental Particles:
Over time, this unstable energy further transformed into fundamental particles, eventually giving rise to all known matter and energy. This process underpins the structure and evolution of the cosmos.

5. Interconnected Dynamics:
The sequence of transformations—from immense energy to unstable energy, to fundamental particles, and eventually to matter and energy—illustrates the interconnected dynamics between existence, event, time, space, and energy.

Enhanced Perspective
The Big Bang model provides a profound framework for understanding the universe's origin. It bridges the concepts of energy, matter, and the fabric of space-time, showing how a singular event laid the foundation for the complex and expansive cosmos we inhabit today.

Understanding the Origins of Energy and the Universe

Limits of Empirical Evidence:
At scales beyond human perception, such as the Planck length, empirical evidence becomes inherently unattainable. Phenomena at these scales fall outside the range of current observational and experimental capabilities, requiring reliance on theoretical and mathematical frameworks.

The Role of Conservation of Energy:
The principle of conservation of energy is a cornerstone of physics. It asserts that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. This principle strongly implies that the energy present in our universe today must have a precursor—either a pre-existing state or a process capable of accounting for its emergence.

While this principle provides a critical constraint on any theory of the universe's origin, it does not offer a complete explanation. It indicates that energy must have been conserved across transitions, suggesting the existence of something before the universe as we know it.

Theoretical Exploration of the Unknown:
In the absence of direct empirical evidence, theoretical frameworks, mathematical models, and logical reasoning become indispensable. These tools enable predictions, hypothesis testing, and exploration of the fundamental nature of reality. They serve as a bridge to understanding phenomena that lie beyond direct observation.

A Partial Understanding:
The conservation of energy offers significant insight but does not fully resolve the mystery of the universe's origin. It reinforces the notion that energy cannot emerge from nothing and must have an antecedent. However, the exact nature of this pre-existing state or process remains an open question.

14 November 2024

The Primordial Existence of Plasma Before Atoms:

14-11-2024

Soumendra Nath Thakur 

Nucleosynthesis began just minutes after the Big Bang, when the universe was in an extremely hot and dense state. During this period, a quark-gluon plasma—a dense mixture of quarks and gluons—condensed to form protons and neutrons. As the universe expanded and cooled, these neutrons began to fuse with protons, creating the nuclei of deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen. This process laid the foundation for the formation of heavier elements in later stages of cosmic evolution

In cosmology, plasma indeed predated atoms in the early universe. Shortly after the Big Bang, the universe existed in an extremely hot, dense state known as the quark-gluon plasma. During this phase, matter consisted mainly of free quarks and gluons. As the universe expanded and cooled, quarks combined to form protons and neutrons, which in turn formed a dense plasma composed primarily of free electrons and nuclei. This plasma state persisted until about 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

At that time, in an event known as recombination, the universe cooled sufficiently for protons and electrons to combine, forming neutral hydrogen atoms. This allowed photons to travel freely, marking the transition from an opaque plasma-dominated universe to a transparent one, filled primarily with atoms. Hence, plasma was indeed the initial form of matter, preceding the stable formation of atoms in the observable universe.

About the research: A Symmetry and Conservation Framework for Photon Energy Interactions in Gravitational Fields:

14-11-2024

A Symmetry and Conservation Framework for Photon Energy Interactions in Gravitational Fields by Soumendra Nath Thakur presents a conceptual and mathematical advancement in quantum mechanics, offering a novel approach that seeks to reconcile quantum mechanics with gravity.

This research highlights the symmetrical nature of photon interactions in strong gravitational environments. This framework is based on the principle that the total energy of a photon remains conserved, even when it passes through an external gravitational field. This means that any energy gained or lost by a photon due to gravitational interactions is balanced, resulting in a net change of zero. 

Qeios

Distinguishing Photon Interactions: Source Well vs. External Fields

9 Feb 2024 — External Gravitational Fields In contrast, when photons or waves traverse through the gravitational fields external to the source object, their inhere...

EasyChair

Photon Interactions with External Gravitational Fields - EasyChair

25 Oct 2024 — Building upon the pioneering contributions of Max Planck and Louis de Broglie, the analysis highlights key equations such as E = hf, ρ = h/λ, and ℓp/

Here are some key points about photon energy interactions in gravitational fields:

Conservation of energy

The equation Eg=Eg expresses the conservation of photon energy in gravitational fields.

EasyChair

Photon Interactions with External Gravitational Fields - EasyChair

25 Oct 2024 — Building upon the pioneering contributions of Max Planck and Louis de Broglie, the analysis highlights key equations such as E = hf, ρ = h/λ, and ℓp.

Redshift and blueshift

The observed redshift and blueshift of photons passing through external gravitational fields are the result of an equalization of gains and losses. 

Qeios

Distinguishing Photon Interactions: Source Well vs. External Fields

9 Feb 2024 — External Gravitational Fields In contrast, when photons or waves traverse through the gravitational fields external to the source object, their inhere...

Gravitational lensing

Gravitational lensing is a result of the momentum exchange between photons and the curvature of external gravitational fields. 

EasyChair

Photon Interactions with External Gravitational Fields - EasyChair

25 Oct 2024 — Building upon the pioneering contributions of Max Planck and Louis de Broglie, the analysis highlights key equations such as E = hf, ρ = h/λ, and ℓp/

Photon behavior

Understanding photon behavior in gravity helps us understand how light interacts with massive objects and how it maintains its energy and momentum. 

Preprints.org

Photon Interactions in Gravity and Antigravity: Conservation, Dark ...

29 Sept 2023 — Photon Interaction with Gravity: Photons, despite being massless particles, do interact with gravity. Gravity is the force that attracts objects wit...

Noether's theorem

In quantum mechanics, Noether's theorem states that for every symmetry in a system, there is a corresponding physical quantity that is conserved. For example, time-symmetry leads to energy conservation, and spatial-symmetry to momentum conservation. 

StudySmarter UK

What is the relationship between symmetry and conservation laws in the context of quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, symmetry and conservation laws are linked by Noether's theorem. This states that for every symmetry in the system, there is a corresponding...

Ideal Nature of Gravitational Lensing and Time Dilation:

 Soumendra Nath Thakur 

24-11-2024

Ideally, the bending of light (gravitational lensing) and time dilation (distortion) are not intrinsic properties of light’s trajectory or a clock’s oscillations; rather, they arise from external influences.

Explanation:

In the context of our physical interpretation of time and space, light should travel in a straight line in free space, unaffected by any intrinsic tendency to bend. Any observed bending of light, or gravitational lensing, is therefore not an inherent property of light itself but rather a result of external influences, such as gravitational fields, which act as perturbations on light’s path.

Similarly, time dilation—seen as a change in a clock’s oscillation rate—is not an intrinsic dilation of time. Instead, it results from external influences affecting the clock’s oscillator, which can distort time measurements. Thus, time dilation in this context is best understood as an error in time reading due to external perturbations, rather than an intrinsic characteristic of time.

13 November 2024

Extract Summary: A Symmetry and Conservation Framework for Photon Energy Interactions in Gravitational Fields:


By Soumendra Nath Thakur, ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

12-11-2024

The study distinguishes between the intrinsic photon energy (E) and the gravitational-interaction energy (Eg), which is treated as separate but interrelated components when photons interact with gravitational fields. Using key quantum mechanical principles, including Planck's energy-frequency relation E=hf and de Broglie's photon momentum-wavelength relation ρ=h/λ, we establish a mathematical framework for understanding these interactions. Additionally, Planck scale parameters are incorporated to define observational limits within quantum-gravitational contexts, ensuring that the formulation aligns with established measurement constraints.

Photon Interactions in Gravitational Fields

This section refines the framework by exploring the distinct types of photon energy interactions under various gravitational conditions. Building on earlier discussions about symmetry in energy and momentum exchange, we now recognize that intrinsic photon energy (E) and gravitational-interaction energy (Eg) are distinct yet symmetrically gained and lost during photon interactions with gravitational fields.

1. Photon Emission and Energy Composition: At the moment of emission, the photon carries its intrinsic energy, E=hf, along with an additional gravitational interaction energy, Eg=hΔf, due to the influence of the gravitational field. The photon’s total energy at emission is therefore E+Eg = h(f+Δf), where Δf represents the frequency shift induced by the gravitational field.

2. Energy Expenditure during Ascent from the Gravitational Well: As the photon ascends from the gravitational well, it expends energy from the gravitational interaction component (Eg), rather than its intrinsic energy (E). This expenditure is reflected by a gradual reduction in Δf, corresponding to the observed gravitational redshift. As the photon escapes the gravitational influence, Eg diminishes, leaving only the photon’s intrinsic energy, E=hf, intact in regions of negligible gravitational potential.

3. Distinct Energy Types: The photon’s inherent energy (E) is fundamentally distinct from the interactional energy (Eg). While E is intrinsic to the photon and constant across gravitational fields, Eg arises from the photon’s interaction with the gravitational field, being temporary and dependent on the photon’s position within that field.

4. Symmetry of Energy and Momentum Exchange: The interactional energy (Eg) is symmetrically gained when the photon enters a gravitational field and symmetrically lost as it exits. This symmetry reflects the reversible nature of gravitational influence on the photon’s total energy. The inherent energy (E), however, remains unaffected by the gravitational field and represents a constant property of the photon, independent of gravitational influence.

5. Gravitational Redshift and Blueshift: As the photon moves away from the gravitational source, it experiences a redshift due to the progressive loss of Eg, with the photon’s frequency shifting from f+Δf to its inherent frequency f as the gravitational interaction energy Eg is expended. Conversely, as the photon moves into a stronger gravitational field, it would experience a blueshift, with an increase in Δf as Eg is symmetrically gained.

Mathematical Presentation: 

The photon’s energy state at emission is represented by the sum of its intrinsic energy (E) and its gravitational-interaction energy (Eg), with the total energy given by:

E + Eg = h(f+Δf)

As the photon moves away from the gravitational source:

1. The expenditure of Eg: The photon loses Eg gradually due to gravitational redshift, with the frequency shift Δf diminishing as the photon climbs out of the gravitational well.

2. The constant inherent energy: The intrinsic energy E=hf remains constant throughout the photon’s journey, unaffected by gravitational influence.

Once the photon has moved beyond the gravitational field’s influence, Eg is fully expended, leaving only the inherent energy E=hf.

Expansion on Photon Energy Interactions in Gravitational Fields:

1. As the photon moves away from the source, it loses Eg due to the gravitational redshift, eventually stabilizing to its intrinsic E=hf when it reaches a region with negligible gravitational potential. This perspective frames the gravitational interaction energy as a component that modifies the photon’s total energy specifically due to its position within the gravitational field, influencing its energy state but diminishing as it escapes the well.

2. Inherent Photon Energy (E): This is given by E=hf, where h is Planck’s constant, and f is the intrinsic frequency of the photon as it is emitted. This energy represents the photon's baseline or inherent energy.

3. Gravitational Interaction Energy (Eg): This additional energy, represented as Eg=hΔf, accounts for the photon's interaction with the gravitational field. Here, Δf represents the frequency shift induced by the gravitational potential at the point of emission.

4. Total Initial Energy at Emission (E+Eg): Combining these, the photon’s energy state at emission is indeed E+Eg, the sum of its inherent energy and the gravitational interactional energy. This total is the photon's highest energy point.

5. As the photon ascends from the gravitational well:

6. Expenditure of Gravitational Interaction Energy (Eg): The photon’s apparent energy reduction due to gravitational redshift occurs from the gravitational interaction energy, Eg=hΔf, rather than its inherent energy E=hf. This distinction is crucial, as Eg is specifically associated with the photon’s interaction with the gravitational field and reflects an additional energy component that only exists while the photon is within the gravitational influence of its source.

7. Inherent Energy (E) Remains Constant: The intrinsic energy, E=hf, remains unaffected by the gravitational field as it is a fundamental property of the photon. Thus, as the photon climbs out of the gravitational well, it "sheds" Eg progressively, aligning with the redshift observed. Eventually, Eg is fully expended when the photon reaches a region of negligible gravitational influence, leaving only its inherent energy, E=hf, intact. 

This interpretation reinforces the idea that gravitational redshift involves only the additional gravitational interactional energy, allowing the photon’s inherent energy to remain consistent across different gravitational potentials.

8. The energy of the photon at emission within a gravitational well effectively. At the moment of emission, the photon's total energy reflects both its inherent frequency and an additional frequency component due to the gravitational field. Here’s how it unfolds:

9. Inherent Energy and Frequency (E = hf): The photon's inherent energy is represented by E=hf, where f is its intrinsic frequency—an unaltered property of the photon that represents its baseline energy state.

10. Additional Frequency Due to Gravitational Interaction (Δf): When the photon is emitted from within the gravitational field of its source, the gravitational interaction imparts an additional frequency shift, Δf. This results from the gravitational influence exerted on the photon at the point of emission, causing it to emerge with a total frequency of f+Δf due to the local field.

11. Total Energy at Emission (E + Eg): Consequently, the total energy of the photon at emission is E+Eg=h(f+Δf). This value represents the photon's highest energy state, with Eg=hΔf being the extra energy due to the gravitational field's interaction with the photon.

12. Energy Expenditure as Photon Escapes the Gravitational Well: As the photon moves away from its source’s gravitational field, it “loses” Eg, represented by a gradual reduction in Δf due to gravitational redshift. This results in the photon’s frequency gradually decreasing to its inherent frequency f, and thus only E=hf remains in regions of negligible gravitational influence.

This approach clearly distinguishes between the photon's intrinsic properties (frequency f and energy E) and the additional, temporary gravitational effects (Δf and Eg) it experiences due to the source's gravitational well.

13. The additional frequency component, Δf, and its corresponding energy Eg=hΔf, are present only while the photon remains within the gravitational influence of its source. This gravitational interaction effect can be summarized as follows:

14. Gravitational Influence on Frequency: The photon's total frequency at emission, f+Δf, includes both its inherent frequency f and the additional gravitationally induced frequency Δf. This additional frequency represents the photon's gravitational interaction energy Eg within the source’s gravitational well.

15. Persistence of Δf Within the Gravitational Field: As long as the photon remains within the gravitational field, Δf persists as a measurable shift. This implies that the photon’s total energy E+Eg=h(f+Δf) remains higher than its inherent energy E=hf.

16. Redshift and Loss of Δf with Distance: As the photon travels away from the gravitational source, Δf gradually diminishes due to gravitational redshift, which effectively reduces Eg. Once the photon is beyond the gravitational field's influence, Δf becomes negligible, leaving only the inherent frequency f and intrinsic energy E=hf.

In summary, Δf and Eg are directly tied to the photon's position within the gravitational well and disappear as the photon escapes, highlighting the temporary nature of gravitational interaction energy while the photon is within the field.

Symmetry in Momentum Exchange

This phase extends the derived equations to analyse the symmetry of momentum exchange in photon interactions with gravitational fields. When photons undergo wavelength or phase shifts due to gravitational influences, the resulting momentum exchange is symmetrical, preserving both intrinsic energy (E) and gravitational-interaction energy (Eg). The proposed framework suggests that, as photons traverse external gravitational wells, they symmetrically gain and lose Eg in a balanced manner, maintaining conservation of total energy and momentum throughout their trajectories.

Comparative Analysis with Classical and Relativistic Perspectives

In the final phase, this framework is compared with both classical and relativistic models of photon behaviour in gravitational fields. The comparison emphasizes the distinct nature of gravitational-interaction energy (Eg) relative to intrinsic photon energy (E), highlighting the model's adherence to the principles of energy conservation while suggesting a departure from interpretations that conflate gravitational effects with spacetime curvature. The analysis presents a fresh perspective on gravitational lensing and dark energy, proposing new interpretations in light of photon-graviton interactions.

Spacetime Curvature vs. Gravitational Field Lensing

1. Background and Title:

The image displays the title "Spacetime Curvature vs. Gravitational Field Lensing" in bold black text. This sets the focus on differentiating between gravitational lensing interpretations based on General Relativity's spacetime curvature and external gravitational fields.

2. Source of Light (Top Right):

Positioned in the top right corner, a small sphere labelled "Source of Light" represents a distant luminous object. This body is drawn small to convey distance, emphasizing that the light travels a vast distance before interacting with gravitational influences.

3. Rays of Light (Extending from Source):

The lines radiate outward from the source of light, symbolizing photon trajectories or light rays moving omni directionally. Several lines are directed toward the bottom left, where they approach the observer, showing how light travels through and interacts with gravitational fields.

4. Observation Point (Bottom Left):

In the bottom left, a larger sphere labelled "Observation of Light" represents the observing body (e.g., Earth). Its larger size suggests proximity, emphasizing that it is the endpoint for analysing the path of light under gravitational influences.

5. Celestial Body (M) as the Moon:

Near the Observation of Light, a smaller sphere labelled "M" represents the Moon, which orbits around the observer (Observation Point). During phenomena like a solar eclipse, M aligns with the observer and the massive body (e.g., Sun), which is crucial for the gravitational lensing demonstration.

6. Massive Body/Sun (Centre):

Cantered between the Source of Light and the Observation of Light, a large sphere labelled "Massive Body/Sun" represents a nearby gravitationally influential object (e.g., the Sun). This body is illustrated as the largest sphere, signifying its strong gravitational influence over light rays passing through its vicinity.

7. Gravitational Fields (Around Massive Body):

The curved lines surround the Massive Body/Sun, representing its gravitational field. This field is extended to visually differentiate between gravitational influences arising from the mass itself rather than from spacetime curvature.

8. Curved Spacetime (Below Massive Body):

Below the Massive Body/Sun, a curvature represents spacetime distortion. This depiction aligns with General Relativity's view of mass-induced spacetime warping, but in this illustration, it is shown as insufficient for redirecting light in a lensing effect, suggesting limitations in the curvature alone.

9. Concept Visualization (Photon Pathways and Interactions):

The visualization emphasizes two distinct photon pathways interacting differently with the massive body, depending on the surrounding fields:

Lower Ray Path (Interaction with Spacetime Curvature):

Photons traveling along the lower ray pathway encounter the curved spacetime around the Massive Body/Sun. This path is obstructed by the mass of the Massive Body, unable to continue toward the Observation Point. This visualization implies that gravitational lensing is not solely due to the spacetime curvature predicted by General Relativity, as these rays cannot bypass the mass.

Upper Ray Path (Interaction with Gravitational Fields):

Photons on the upper path bypass the curved spacetime and instead follow the gravitational field lines around the Massive Body/Sun. In this pathway, the photons are redirected by the gravitational field rather than by spacetime curvature. This interaction with the gravitational field allows them to proceed unobstructed toward the Observation Point, proposing that gravitational lensing is actually facilitated by these external gravitational fields.

Observational Alignment during a Solar Eclipse:

It is essential to understand that gravitational lensing is often observed during a solar eclipse, where M (the Moon) aligns between the Earth (Observation Point) and the Sun (Massive Body), casting a shadow on Earth. During this alignment, the Source of Light, Massive Body/Sun, M, and Observation Point are all positioned in a straight line. This alignment reinforces the need for the massive body’s external gravitational field to guide photons to the observation point, rather than the curvature of spacetime alone.

Summary

This image visually argues that gravitational lensing arises from photon interactions within the external gravitational fields surrounding massive bodies rather than the spacetime curvature framework alone, as proposed by General Relativity. By emphasizing the photon energy pathways, this illustration suggests that the gravitational field of a massive body actively guides light toward the observer, demonstrating gravitational lensing without requiring spacetime distortion. This approach aligns with quantum mechanical interpretations, highlighting how external gravitational fields interact with photon energy to produce the lensing effect.