Research Overview: Extended Classical Mechanics. Vol-1.

17 September 2024

The research, ‘Extended Classical Mechanics’, by Soumendra Nath Thakur offers a comprehensive exploration of the foundational principles of physics, particularly focusing on mass, gravity, and their interactions. The study delves into the Equivalence Principle, a cornerstone of classical mechanics, and extends its application to incorporate contemporary understandings of dark matter and dark energy.

Key Contributions

Redefining Gravitating Mass:

The research introduces a new perspective on gravitating mass, incorporating the concept of negative apparent mass. This challenges the traditional understanding of gravitational interactions, particularly in the context of dark energy.

Introducing Apparent Mass:

The study proposes the concept of apparent mass, a dynamic term that can influence the observed mass of an object under certain conditions. This innovation allows for a more nuanced understanding of mass and its role in gravitational dynamics.

Revisiting Newton's Law:

The research reinterprets Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation to account for the newly introduced concepts of apparent mass and effective mass. This modification provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding gravitational forces.

Integrating Dark Matter and Dark Energy:

The study seamlessly integrates contemporary theories of dark matter and dark energy into the classical mechanics framework. This integration offers a more holistic perspective on the universe's gravitational dynamics.

Methodology and Implications

The research employs a combination of theoretical reinterpretation, mathematical modelling, and numerical simulations to validate its findings. The implications of this work are far-reaching, potentially influencing our understanding of gravitational theory, dark energy, and the overall structure of the universe.

Overall Significance

"Extended Classical Mechanics" presents a significant contribution to the field of physics. By extending the classical framework to incorporate modern concepts, the research offers a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the universe's fundamental laws. It has the potential to inspire further research and advancements in our understanding of gravity and its implications for cosmology.

Additional Insights

The study's focus on the Equivalence Principle highlights its central role in understanding the relationship between mass and gravity.

The introduction of negative apparent mass provides a new perspective on the nature of mass and its interactions.

The integration of dark matter and dark energy into the classical framework demonstrates the study's relevance to contemporary cosmological theories.

The research's potential implications for gravitational theory and our understanding of the universe's structure underscore its significance

Gravity as a Force and the Misinterpretation of Time Dilation and Spacetime Curvature.

Soumendra Nath Thakur
16 September 2024

Gravity is a fundamental force that attracts objects toward each other, caused by the interaction between masses.

• Gravitational Force: The attraction between two objects.
• Mass: The larger the mass, the stronger the gravitational pull.
• Distance: Gravitational force weakens as the distance between masses increases.
• Earth's Gravity: Keeps objects on the ground and causes them to fall.
• Planets: Gravity holds planets in orbit around the sun.

There are four fundamental forces of nature:

• Gravity: Responsible for keeping planets in orbit and holding us to Earth.
• Electromagnetism: Governs forces such as those keeping a book on a table, where electrons in the table repel those in the book.
• Strong Nuclear Force: One of the fundamental forces.
• Weak Nuclear Force: Critical for nuclear fusion in the sun.

These forces are also known as fundamental interactions.

However, while Albert Einstein proposed that gravity is the curvature of spacetime (a combination of space's three dimensions—length, width, and height—and time), this notion is flawed. Einstein’s theory suggests that more massive objects warp spacetime, creating what we perceive as gravity. Unfortunately, in doing so, Einstein also claimed time is "natural" and subject to dilation (t' > t) under motion or differences in gravitational potential.

This assertion is incorrect. Einstein's work lacked solid experimental support for time dilation. The biased experiments that followed confirmed time dilation only by overlooking the real cause—time distortion due to phase shifts in relative frequencies. Over 128 years, no one has adequately falsified Einstein's theory due to these biased results.

My research scientifically disproves time dilation and provides a correct explanation for time distortion. I demonstrate that 'Relative time emerges from relative frequencies.' The phase shift in relative frequencies, due to infinitesimal energy loss and wavelength elongation caused by relativistic effects or differences in gravitational potential, leads to errors in clock readings, which have been mistakenly interpreted as time dilation.

The phase shift in the oscillation frequency can be used to calculate the magnitude of this time distortion using the following formula:

• For a 1° phase shift: T(deg) = (1/f)/360 = Δt or,
• For an x° phase shift: Δtₓ = x(1/360f₀)

Similarly, Einstein's view of space as a physical entity is mistaken. Space is a set of dimensions (height, depth, and width) in which things exist and move—mathematical concepts rather than physical entities. Experimenters, influenced by bias, accepted gravitational lensing as evidence of spacetime curvature, when it is actually due to the curvature in gravitational fields, not spacetime. My research provides the correct explanation for gravitational lensing.

In this context, the following mathematical presentation explores the behaviour of photons in strong gravitational fields:

• Equations:
• E = hf; ρ = h/λ; ℓₚ/tₚ
• Eg = E + ΔE = E − ΔE; E = Eg
• Eg = E + Δρ = E − Δρ = E; h/Δλ = h/−Δλ
• Eg = E; Δρ =−Δρ; ℓₚ/tₚ

Where: 

• c: Speed of light for photons 

• E: Energy of a photon 
• f: Frequency of a photon 
• h: Planck's constant 
• ℓₚ: The Planck length. 1.6×10⁻³⁵ metres. 
• tₚ: The Planck time.  5.39×10⁻⁴⁴ seconds. 
• Δλ: A change in wavelength of a photon 
• Δρ: A change in momentum of a photon 
• λ: Wavelength of a photon 
• ρ: Momentum of a photon 

These equations demonstrate the consistency of photon energy in gravitational fields and reveal a symmetrical relationship between photon energy and gravitational fields, challenging general relativity’s predictions. This suggests that general relativity is either incomplete or incorrect in this context.

Therefore, Einstein’s notion that gravity is the curvature of spacetime is a flawed presentation, and the relativistic idea that gravity is not a force but a consequence of curved spacetime is incorrect.

#GravityIsForce #TimeDilation #CurvatureInSpacetime is #wrong

Equivalence of Inertial and Gravitational Mass in Classical Mechanics.

15-09-2024

The equivalence principle in classical mechanics posits that inertial mass (Mᴍ) is equal to gravitational mass (Mɢ), i.e., 

Mᴍ = Mɢ.

Given that:

Inertial mass is related to acceleration by:

Mᴍ = F/a

Gravitational mass is expressed as:

Mɢ = Fɢ·r²/G·Mᴍ

Thus, the equivalence principle (Mᴍ = Mɢ) leads to:

F/a = Fɢ·r²/G·Mᴍ

This equation shows that the force (F) causing acceleration (a) due to an object’s inertial mass is equivalent to the gravitational force (Fɢ) exerted by mass (Mᴍ) at a distance (r), scaled by the gravitational constant (G).

Interpretation:

The equivalence principle demonstrates that an object's resistance to acceleration (inertial mass) is indistinguishable from its gravitational interaction (gravitational mass), highlighting the fundamental relationship between gravity and inertia in classical mechanics.

This principle is key to understanding both classical and relativistic physics, illustrating the balance between gravitational and inertial forces through r, a, and G.

#EquivalencePrinciple #ClassicalMechanics

Clarifying the Inapplicability of Time Dilation to Light and the Role of Planck Length

15 September 2024

ResearchGate Discussion Link

Dear Robert A. Phillips,

Thank you for your thoughtful question. My paper maintains that light is not subject to time dilation, and this is a consistent stance given that time dilation applies to objects or systems experiencing either relative velocity or differences in gravitational potential, both of which apply to masses moving at speeds less than the speed of light. Time dilation, as understood in relativistic terms, does not apply to light itself.

For time dilation to occur, one needs two clocks—one stationary and one in motion. When the moving clock reaches the speed of light, it ceases to function as a clock since time, in that frame, would no longer progress in a measurable way. Hence, time dilation is not applicable to light, which always travels at a constant speed, unaffected by these considerations.

The consideration of light's redshift or blueshift due to gravitational effects is important, but it's critical to differentiate between these phenomena and time dilation. Redshift or blueshift causes a change in the frequency and wavelength of light, which results in time delay or distortion, not dilation. A standard clock would measure time distortion or delay (a deviation in the measured time due to the change in wavelength) but not the enlargement of time associated with time dilation.

Regarding your point on the Planck length, this unit is derived from fundamental constants such as c, G, ħ, and kB and thus naturally includes gravitational consequences. The Planck length, defined long before the introduction of general relativity and the concept of spacetime warpage, remains consistent within the relativistic framework, although it represents a scale at which classical interpretations of spacetime break down, and quantum gravitational effects must be considered.

Thus, while Planck length is a vital concept, it does not directly tie into the observable warpage of spacetime in the way time dilation is often described.

In Summary:

In my paper, I maintain that light is not subject to time dilation, as time dilation arises from relative motion or gravitational potential differences between two clocks, which are constrained by velocities below the speed of light. Since light always travels at the speed of light, it cannot experience time dilation like matter does. If a clock were to reach the speed of light, it would no longer function, as it would lose its capacity to measure time.

Redshift and blueshift result from changes in wavelength and frequency, which I define as time distortions, not time dilation. The equation c = f⋅λ ensures that frequency and wavelength changes are inversely related, and these variations cause time distortions Δt = 1/T, distinct from time dilation (t' > t), which involves the relative expansion of time.

Regarding Planck length, it belongs to the Planck unit system, based on constants c, G, ħ, and kB. Planck length includes gravitational effects and was formulated before the concept of spacetime warpage in general relativity. While gravitational lensing results from spacetime warping, it does not alter the Planck units themselves. Near the Planck scale, quantum gravity effects dominate, rendering classical relativity inapplicable.

Best regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur

Clarifying Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Gravitational Dynamics: A Response to Robert A. Phillips

15 September 2024

ResearchGate Discussion Link

Dear Mr. Robert A. Phillips,

Thank you for sharing your thought-provoking question. I appreciate the depth of your inquiry, but I would like to offer a few clarifications and alternative perspectives based on my research.

Firstly, I would differ slightly with the beginning of your statement, "Based on the descriptions and observations of dark matter and dark energy." The current scientific understanding does not actually provide direct descriptions or observations of dark matter and dark energy themselves. Instead, we observe their gravitational effects on the universe. The term "dark" is used to signify that these entities do not emit or reflect light, as opposed to "illuminating" baryonic matter. Dark matter, especially baryonic dark matter, is hypothesized to be made up of baryons, manifesting in forms like diffuse gas clouds, low-luminosity stars, and planets. However, this baryonic dark matter makes up only a small fraction of the overall dark matter content in the universe.

Moreover, when discussing dark matter in the context of your model, my focus lies not on dark matter as a medium but on its observable gravitational effects. My research addresses how matter mass (Mᴍ), which includes both baryonic and non-baryonic dark matter, affects classical mechanics, especially in terms of gravitational dynamics and mass measurements within an extended framework.

As for your interpretation of dark energy as "propagating gravitational waves caused by the gravitational acceleration of matter," this seems to suggest treating gravitational waves as a form of substance. However, my research frames dark energy not as a substance, but as a phenomenon emerging from cosmic motion and gravitational dynamics. Dark energy manifests through the effects of motion and the gravitational interactions of matter rather than being a material entity. Specifically, the apparent negative mass (−Mᵃᵖᵖ) and the negative effective mass of dark energy (Mᴅᴇ) are better understood as consequences of motion and gravitational dynamics rather than being tangible substances.

This view aligns with the extended classical mechanics framework, offering a coherent explanation of gravitational interactions, particularly in systems impacted by dark energy and apparent negative mass. My work emphasizes the role of cosmic motion and its relationship with gravitational forces in shaping our understanding of dark energy.

I hope this response clarifies my perspective and contributes to our shared understanding of these cosmic phenomena. I appreciate your engagement with these complex ideas.

Best regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur