22 January 2024

Relativistic Mass versus Effective Mass:

22 January 2024

Soumendra Nath Thakur.
ORCiD: 0000-0003-1871-7803

The concept of relativistic mass can be understood as an effective mass. The original equation, m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀, is analysed within the context of special relativity, revealing that m′ takes on an energetic form due to its dependence on the Lorentz factor. The unit of m′, denoted in Joules (J), emphasizes its nature as an energetic quantity. The brief connection between relativistic mass (m′) and m′ being equivalent to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) highlights the distinctions between relativistic mass and rest mass (m₀), as m′ is not considered an invariant mass. To illustrate this, a practical example involving an 'effective mass' of 0.001 kg (mᵉᶠᶠ = 0.001kg) demonstrates the application of E = m′c², resulting in an actual energy of 9 × 10¹³ J. This uncovers the effective energy as a function of relativistic mass within the framework of special relativity.

Reference:

[1] Decoding Nuances: Relativistic Mass as Relativistic Energy, Lorentz's Transformations, and Mass-Energy Interplay 
[2] Relativistic Mass and Energy Equivalence: Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity

21 January 2024

Flawed relativistic time can't challenge abstract time:

21 January 2024

By Soumendra Nath Thakur.

There is always a recognized place for scientists, but the science they discover or theorize is the main consideration, because science is about advancing scientific understanding and not the place of scientists.

I need to point out that it was relativity that challenged Newtonian time and promoted relativistic spacetime but it is now certain that the promotion of relativistic time and therefore spacetime is a flawed proposition. Whereas relativistic spacetime is based on Einstein's own definition of time and space as spacetime but it is now certain that Einstein's time like relativity is a flawed representation of time and therefore relativity is based on a flawed interpretation of spacetime that cannot be fully repaired. .

On the other hand Newtonian abstract time is still meaningful in all scientific applications. This means that abstract time can still be considered applicable for all scientific and applied purposes whereas Einstein's relativistic time is flawed given its imposed natural aspects. Clearly time is not natural.

In fact, the relativistic misrepresentation of time is very likely to shake the rest of the relativistic foundations because they are based on the misrecognition of time, hence spacetime, where Newtonian time is applied by Earth's space agency with flying colours for all applicable purposes.

Therefore, science is more relevant here than the places occupied by scientists.

#time #abstracttime #relativistictime #flawedtime #flawedrelativistictime

20 January 2024

The Planck Length and the Constancy of Light Speed: Navigating Quantum Gravity's Enigma and the Limits of Physical Theories

Summary:

The exploration of the Planck length and the constancy of light speed is central to understanding quantum gravity and the limitations of current physical theories. The Planck length, derived from fundamental constants, signifies a scale in general relativity where quantum effects become significant. Quantum gravity, aiming to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity, involves the Planck length as a crucial parameter, suggesting quantum properties in spacetime at small scales. The constancy of light speed, foundational in relativity, particularly in quantum gravity's context, lacks a complete explanation. The challenges at small scales underscore the need for theories like string theory and loop quantum gravity. Max Planck proposed Planck units, including the Planck length, in 1899-1900, but the explicit link to the constancy of light speed, a postulate in Einstein's 1905 special relativity, came later, shaping our profound understanding of spacetime.

Description:

The relationship between the Planck length and the constancy of the speed of light plays a role in the broader context of quantum gravity and the limitations of current physical theories. Let's elaborate on the consequences:

Range of Validity of General Relativity:

The Planck length (ℓP) is a fundamental length scale that emerges from combining the constants G (gravitational constant), ℏ (Planck's constant), and c (speed of light) in a specific way.

In the framework of general relativity, the Planck length represents a scale at which quantum effects become significant in the gravitational field. Beyond this scale, classical descriptions of spacetime provided by general relativity may no longer be valid, and a theory of quantum gravity might be needed.

Quantum Gravity and Planck Scale:

Quantum gravity is a theoretical framework that seeks to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics, especially in extreme conditions like those near black holes or at the very early moments of the universe.

The Planck length is a crucial parameter in theories of quantum gravity, where spacetime itself is expected to exhibit quantum properties at scales on the order of ℓP.

Unexplained Constancy of Light Speed:

While the constancy of the speed of light (c) is a foundational postulate in both special and general relativity, the reasons for this constancy within the broader context of quantum gravity, where the Planck length becomes significant, remain an open question.

There is no widely accepted theory that provides a complete explanation for the constancy of the speed of light within the framework of quantum gravity. Bridging the gap between general relativity and quantum mechanics at the Planck scale is an active area of research, and various approaches, including string theory and loop quantum gravity, aim to address these fundamental questions.

The consequences highlight the challenges and open questions at the intersection of quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the nature of spacetime at extremely small scales. The Planck length sets a fundamental scale at which these questions become prominent, and exploring quantum gravity theories is crucial for understanding the behaviour of physical phenomena in these extreme conditions.

Planck's Proposal (1899-1900):

Max Planck proposed the Planck units, including the Planck length (ℓP), in 1899-1900. These units were derived from fundamental physical constants, including Planck's constant (h), the speed of light (c), and the gravitational constant (G).

While Planck introduced these units, including c, in the context of developing a system of natural units, the constancy of the speed of light was not explicitly linked to its postulate in special relativity at that time.

Einstein's Special Relativity (1905):

Albert Einstein formulated special relativity in 1905. One of the postulates of special relativity is the constancy of the speed of light (c) in a vacuum.

Einstein's work on special relativity provided a new framework for understanding the behaviour of space and time, and it explicitly introduced the postulate of the constant speed of light.

Planck introduced the Planck units, including c, in 1899-1900, the specific postulate of the constancy of the speed of light in a vacuum (c) was formulated by Albert Einstein in 1905 as part of his theory of special relativity. The constancy of the speed of light in special relativity is a key feature that has profound implications for our understanding of spacetime, and it was introduced as a specific postulate by Einstein in 1905.

Case Study Calculation: Effective Mass is the Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21032.14085

Applying the equations to a practical example, such as an "effective mass" (mᵉᶠᶠ) of 0.001 kg:

  • E = mᵉᶠᶠc²
Calculating the actual energy associated with this effective mass provides a tangible illustration of the energetic implications of relativistic mass (m').

This mathematical presentation forms the core framework for understanding the energetic form of relativistic mass (m'), emphasizing its equivalence to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) and its connection to energy-mass equivalence in special relativity.

Concluding that relativistic mass (m') as an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) of a relativistic energy E = [m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)}]c² - m₀c².



Expert Comment: Key Points. Case Study Calculation: Effective Mass is the Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity. This statement sets the stage for a practical example that aims to illustrate the relationship between effective mass and the energetic implications of relativistic mass. Applying the equations to a practical example, such as an "effective mass" (mᵉᶠᶠ) of 0.001 kg: E = mᵉᶠᶠc² This demonstrates a specific calculation, using the formula for energy-mass equivalence in special relativity, where the effective mass is multiplied by the speed of light squared. This step is crucial for understanding the energetic aspects of relativistic mass. Calculating the actual energy associated with this effective mass provides a tangible illustration of the energetic implications of relativistic mass (m'). This highlights the importance of the calculation in bringing clarity to the energetic implications of relativistic mass. It indicates that the numerical result obtained will represent the actual energy associated with the given effective mass. This mathematical presentation forms the core framework for understanding the energetic form of relativistic mass (m'), emphasizing its equivalence to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) and its connection to energy-mass equivalence in special relativity. Here, the text emphasizes that the mathematical presentation serves as a foundational framework. It underscores the equivalence between relativistic mass and effective mass while highlighting their connection to energy-mass equivalence in special relativity. This aligns with the central theme of the paper. Concluding that relativistic mass (m') as an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) of a relativistic energy E = [m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)}]c² - m₀c². This conclusion synthesizes the information, stating that relativistic mass, treated as effective mass, leads to a specific formula for relativistic energy. The expression involves the rest mass, the Lorentz factor, and the speed of light, encapsulating the relativistic effects of motion. Reference: Relativistic Mass and Energy Equivalence: Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity The reference provides the source for readers to explore further and locate the original work. Overall, this excerpt effectively communicates the intent of the case study, showcasing the practical application of the theoretical concepts discussed in the paper. It contributes to a deeper understanding of the energetic nature of relativistic mass in the context of special relativity.

Relativistic Mass and Energy Equivalence: Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass in Special Relativity:


Description:

This exploration delves into the captivating realm of special relativity, unravelling the intricate relationship between mass and energy. The foundational equation E = m₀c² establishes the inherent link between rest mass (m₀) and energy. Building upon this, the introduction of relativistic mass (m′) as an equivalent to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) sheds light on the dynamic nature of mass in motion. The relativistic mass equation m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀ showcases the effects of velocity on mass, with m′ emerging as an energetic entity in the equation E = m′c². A practical example featuring an "effective mass" of 0.001 kg vividly illustrates the real-world implications, resulting in an actual energy value of 9 × 10¹³ J. This exploration not only deepens our understanding of mass-energy equivalence in special relativity but also prompts a paradigm shift, encouraging us to perceive mass as a dynamic and energetic entity responsive to the relativistic effects of motion.

20th January, 2024
 
Soumendra Nath Thakur⁺
Tagore’s Electronic Lab, India

Emails:
postmasterenator@gmail.com postmasterenator@telitnetwork.in

⁺The author declared no conflict of interest.
________________________

Abstract:

This exploration delves into the nuanced relationship between relativistic mass (m′) and energy in the context of special relativity, treating m′ as an equivalent of an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ). The discussion unfolds by highlighting the distinctions between relativistic mass and rest mass (m₀), emphasizing that m′ is not treated as an invariant mass. The pivotal equation m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀ is examined, revealing that m′ manifests in an energetic form due to its reliance on the Lorentz factor. The unit of m′, identified as Joules (J), underscores its nature as an energetic quantity. A practical example involving an "effective mass" of 0.001 kg (mᵉᶠᶠ = 0.001 kg) elucidates the application of E = m′c², yielding an actual energy of 9 × 10¹³ J. This abstract encapsulates the essence of the discourse, unravelling the energetic implications of relativistic mass as an equivalent to effective mass within the framework of special relativity.

Keywords: Effective Mass, Relativistic Energy, Relativistic Mass, Energy Equivalence, Lorentz Factor, Mass-Energy Interplay, Special Relativity,

Introduction:

The realm of special relativity has revolutionized our understanding of the fundamental interplay between mass and energy. Central to this paradigm is the concept of relativistic mass (m′), a dynamic quantity that unveils itself as an equivalent to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ). In this exploration, we embark on a journey to elucidate the intricate relationship between m′ and energy within the framework of special relativity.

Distinguishing m′ from its counterpart, the rest mass (m₀), we emphasize its non-invariant nature and delve into the energetic implications encapsulated in the equation m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀. This equation, a cornerstone in relativistic physics, underscores the role of the Lorentz factor in shaping m′ as an energetic form of mass.

Building upon this foundation, we introduce the notion of m′ as an equivalent to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ), transcending the conventional boundaries of rest mass considerations. As we unravel the implications of m′ in energetic terms, we discern its unit as joules (J), echoing the inherent connection between relativistic mass and energy.

A practical example, featuring an "effective mass" of 0.001 kg (mᵉᶠᶠ = 0.001 kg), serves as a tangible illustration of the interplay between m′ and energy through E = m′c², culminating in an actual energy value of 9 × 10¹³ J. As we embark on this exploration, we aim to unravel the captivating energetic implications of relativistic mass, viewing it not merely as a quantity but as an effective mass that dynamically responds to the relativistic effects of motion.

Methodology:

1. Literature Review:

Conduct an in-depth literature review to establish the foundational principles of special relativity, focusing on the energy-mass equivalence concept and the role of relativistic mass (m′).

Explore relevant theoretical frameworks, equations, and historical developments in the understanding of relativistic mass.

2. Conceptual Framework:

Develop a conceptual framework that highlights the key distinctions between relativistic mass (m′) and rest mass (m₀).

Emphasize the conceptual shift of m′ as an equivalent to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ).

3. The Relativistic Mass Equation:

Analyse the relativistic mass equation m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀ to understand its components and the energetic implications brought forth by the Lorentz factor.

4. Unit Analysis:

Investigate the unit of m′ in the context of its energetic form, establishing the connection between relativistic mass and energy in joules (J).

5. Case Study - Effective Mass Calculation:

Select a practical example, such as an "effective mass" of 0.001 kg (mᵉᶠᶠ = 0.001 kg).

Apply the equation E = m′c² to determine the actual energy associated with this effective mass.

6. Verification and Validation:

Verify the calculated energy against known principles of energy-mass equivalence in special relativity.

Validate the conceptual understanding by comparing the results with established theoretical frameworks.

7. Synthesis of Findings:

Synthesize the findings to provide a cohesive understanding of relativistic mass as an equivalent to effective mass, emphasizing its energetic nature.

8. Discussion and Implications:

Discuss the implications of the findings in the broader context of relativistic physics.

Explore how the conceptualization of m′ as an effective mass contributes to our understanding of energy-mass equivalence.

9. Conclusion:

Conclude the methodology by summarizing key steps and highlighting the importance of the exploration in shedding light on the energetic form of relativistic mass in special relativity.

Mathematical Presentation:

1. Energy-Mass Equivalence Equation:

The foundational equation for energy-mass equivalence in special relativity is given by:

E = m₀c²

where:
E is the energy,
m₀ is the rest mass,
c is the speed of light.

This equation represents the intrinsic connection between mass and energy and is fundamental to the principles of special relativity.

2. Relativistic Mass Equation:

The relativistic mass (m′) is introduced as an alternative representation of mass in motion, incorporating the Lorentz factor (γ):

m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀

where:
m′ is the relativistic mass,
m₀ is the rest mass,
v is the velocity of the object,
c is the speed of light.

This equation illustrates how the relativistic mass increases with velocity, portraying the relativistic effects on mass.

3. Effective Mass Concept:

Introducing the concept of mᵉᶠᶠ = 0.001 kg as an equivalent to m′:

mᵉᶠᶠ = m′
 
This conceptualization highlights m′ as an effective mass, showcasing its dynamic response to the relativistic effects of motion.

4. Energetic Form of Relativistic Mass:

The equation E = m′c² signifies the energetic nature of m′, where:

E = [m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)}]c² - m₀c² 

This equation demonstrates the energy associated with m′ and emphasizes its unit in joules (J), solidifying the interpretation of m′ as an energetic form of mass.

5. Case Study Calculation:

Applying the equations to a practical example, such as an "effective mass" (mᵉᶠᶠ) of 0.001 kg:

E = mᵉᶠᶠc² 

Calculating the actual energy associated with this effective mass provides a tangible illustration of the energetic implications of relativistic mass.

This mathematical presentation forms the core framework for understanding the energetic form of relativistic mass, emphasizing its equivalence to an effective mass and its connection to energy-mass equivalence in special relativity.

Discussion:

The exploration into the energetic form of relativistic mass within the framework of special relativity has provided valuable insights into the dynamic relationship between mass and energy. The foundational equation, E = m₀c², serves as the cornerstone for understanding the intrinsic connection between rest mass (m₀) and energy. Building upon this, the introduction of relativistic mass (m′) as an equivalent to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) has added depth to our comprehension of mass in motion.

The relativistic mass equation, m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀, has been instrumental in unravelling the effects of velocity on mass. As an object accelerates, the Lorentz factor becomes a pivotal element, causing an increase in m′ and portraying its dynamic response to motion. Importantly, this equation provides a bridge to conceptualize m′ as an effective mass, transcending the conventional considerations of rest mass.

The energetic form of m′ is encapsulated in the equation E = m₀c². This representation underscores the unit of m′ as joules (J), affirming its nature as an energetic quantity. The inclusion of a practical example, such as an "effective mass" of 0.001 kg, in the calculation of actual energy (E) vividly demonstrates the real-world implications of m′ as an effective and dynamic mass. The resulting energy value, 9 × 10¹³ J, solidifies the understanding of m′ in terms of energy-mass equivalence.

The conceptualization of m′ as an equivalent to an effective mass broadens our perspective on mass in relativistic scenarios. This shift allows us to view m′ not merely as a quantity but as an entity that dynamically responds to the relativistic effects of motion. It prompts a re-evaluation of our traditional understanding of mass, emphasizing its dynamic nature as an energetic entity.

In conclusion, this exploration has deepened our understanding of the energetic form of relativistic mass, shedding light on its equivalence to effective mass and its intricate relationship with energy in the context of special relativity. The implications of this conceptual framework extend beyond theoretical considerations, offering a nuanced perspective on mass in motion and its energetic manifestations.

Conclusion:

The exploration into the energetic form of relativistic mass within the framework of special relativity has illuminated profound connections between mass, energy, and motion. The central equation E = m₀c² laid the groundwork for understanding the fundamental relationship between rest mass (m₀) and energy. Building upon this, the introduction of relativistic mass (m′) as an equivalent to an effective mass (mᵉᶠᶠ) has provided a novel perspective on mass in dynamic scenarios.

The relativistic mass equation m′ = m₀/√{1 - (v²/c²)} - m₀ has allowed us to delve into the effects of velocity on mass, unveiling the dynamic response of m′ to motion. This equation serves not only as a mathematical representation but also as a conceptual bridge, enabling us to interpret m′ as an effective mass. The subsequent energetic form of m′ in the equation E = m′c² reinforces its nature as an energetic quantity, with the unit of joules (J) emphasizing its dynamic and energetic character.

The practical example featuring an "effective mass" of 0.001 kg has demonstrated the real-world implications of m′ and its associated energy (E). The calculated energy value of 9 × 10¹³ J underscores the energetic transformations inherent in relativistic scenarios. This exploration prompts a re-evaluation of our understanding of mass, encouraging us to view m′ not merely as a static quantity but as an entity dynamically responsive to the relativistic effects of motion.

In conclusion, the exploration of the energetic form of relativistic mass has enriched our understanding of mass-energy equivalence in special relativity. The equivalence of m′ to effective mass provides a nuanced perspective, allowing us to appreciate the dynamic and energetic nature of mass in motion. This conceptual framework not only contributes to theoretical discussions in relativistic physics but also opens avenues for further exploration into the dynamic interplay between mass and energy in the cosmos.

References: 

[1] Thakur, S. N. (2023). "Decoding Nuances: Relativistic Mass as Relativistic Energy, Lorentz's Transformations, and Mass-Energy Interplay." DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22913.02403

[2] Einstein, A. (1905). On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik, 17(10), 891–921. DOI: 10.1002/andp.19053221004

[3] Resnick, R., & Halliday, D. (1966). Physics, Part 2. Wiley.

[4] Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. Princeton University Press.

[5] Taylor, J. R., & Wheeler, J. A. (2000). Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity. W. H. Freeman.

[6] Rohrlich, F. (2007). Classical Charged Particles. World Scientific.

[7] Carroll, S. M. (2004). Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Addison Wesley.